The gender gap: differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation.

Survey data over recent decades show men to differ from women on a number of political attitudes and on political party identification. We provide evidence that many such differences can be attributed to individual differences in Social Dominance Orientation (SDO)--preference for inequality among social groups--that are sex linked. Results from a US college student sample (N = 463) and a US 1992 voter sample (N = 478) replicate previous findings of more male support of conservative ideology, military programmes, and punitive policies and more female support of social programmes and equal rights. Consistent with our hypotheses, men were more social dominance oriented than women, and SDO accounted for much of the sex-linked variability in political attitudes, SDO was also a significant predictor of candidate choice in the US 1992 presidential election through its influence on policy attitudes and political ideology. Implications of these results for theories of gender and politics are discussed.

[1]  Justice, Gender, and the Family , 1991 .

[2]  K. Andersen,et al.  Candidate Evaluations by Men and Women , 1979 .

[3]  I. Walker.  Effects of sex, nationality, and political beliefs on allocation preferences , 1989 .

[4]  B. Ekehammar,et al.  Sex‐related differences in socio‐political ideology , 1980 .

[5]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Sex Differences in Empathy and Related Capacities , 1983 .

[6]  D. Granberg,et al.  Subjective agreement with the presidential candidates of 1976 and 1980. , 1982 .

[7]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  B. Ekehammar.  Sex Differences in Socio-Political Attitudes Revisited. , 1985 .

[9]  Lawrence C. Mayer,et al.  Feminism and religiosity: Female electoral behaviour in Western Europe , 1985 .

[10]  F. Pratto,et al.  Group Dominance and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 1995 .

[11]  Jim Sidanius,et al.  The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. , 1993 .

[12]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. , 1993 .

[13]  R. Y. Shapiro,et al.  Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s , 1986 .

[14]  F. Pratto,et al.  Social Dominance Orientation and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Case of Invariance? , 1994 .

[15]  H. Eysenck.  Social Attitudes and Social Class , 1971 .

[16]  P. Norris.  THE GENDER GAP IN BRITAIN AND AMERICA , 1985 .

[17]  V. Sapiro.  The Political Integration of Women: Roles, Socialization, and Politics , 1983 .

[18]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  F. Pratto,et al.  A Comparison of Symbolic Racism Theory and Social Dominance Theory as Explanations for Racial Policy Attitudes , 1992 .

[20]  N. Feshbach,et al.  12 – Sex Differences in Empathy and Social Behavior in Children1 , 1982 .

[21]  S. Silverstein.  Woman, Culture and Society , 1975, African Studies Review.

[22]  Patricia A. Kyle,et al.  Women at the Polls , 1978 .

[23]  G. Wilson,et al.  A new measure of conservatism. , 1968, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[24]  F. Pratto,et al.  Consensual racism and career track: Some implications of social dominance theory. , 1991 .

[25]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Myth and Reality: The ERA and the Gender Gap in the 1980 Election , 1985 .

[26]  Glenn D. Wilson,et al.  The Psychology of conservatism , 1973 .

[27]  B. Ekehammar,et al.  Sex, Political Party Preference, And Higher-Order Dimensions of Sociopolitical Ideology , 1983 .

[28]  T. M. Harrison,et al.  Images Versus Issues in the 1984 Presidential Election Differences Between Men and Women , 1991 .

[29]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .