A Review of Conceptual Models for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jean Dansereau,et al. Wheelchair Seating Aids: How Satisfied Are Consumers? , 1999 .
[2] N. Edwards,et al. Exploring seniors' views on the use of assistive devices in fall prevention. , 1998, Public health nursing.
[3] R O Smith,et al. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[4] L. Verbrugge,et al. The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. , 1997, American journal of public health.
[5] L. Gitlin,et al. Factors Predicting Assistive Device Use in the Home by Older People Following Rehabilitation , 1996, Journal of aging and health.
[6] Hugh Stewart,et al. Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.
[7] Christine Marie Geiger,et al. The Utilization of Assistive Devices by Patients Discharged from an Acute Rehabilitation Setting , 1990 .
[8] J. Jutai,et al. Psychosocial Impact of Electronic Aids to Daily Living , 2000, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[9] M Dijkers,et al. Measuring quality of life: methodological issues. , 1999, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[10] P. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[11] Rehabilitation ideology and respiratory support technology. , 1990, Social science & medicine.
[12] L. Haines,et al. Assessment Models and Software Support for Assistive Technology Teams , 2000 .
[13] Dave L. Edyburn. Part III: A map of the technology integration process , 1998 .
[14] J. Rogers,et al. The Use and Effectiveness of Assistive Devices Possessed by Patients Seen in Home Care , 1987 .
[15] R. Carter,et al. Evaluation of health services , 2020, Economics and Australian Health Policy.
[16] Janice Light,et al. Do Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions Really Make a Difference?: The Challenges of Efficacy Research , 1999 .
[17] L. Gitlin,et al. Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. , 1998, The Gerontologist.
[18] L H Kraskowsky,et al. Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[19] Doris Aaronson,et al. Computer use by the visually impaired , 1987 .
[20] K. Preston White,et al. Systems engineering models of human-machine interaction , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[21] M J Scherer,et al. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.
[22] Y. Robitaille,et al. Factors Predicting the Implementation of Home Modifications Among Elderly People with Loss of Independence , 1994 .
[23] Elaine Trefler,et al. No Aid, an Etran, a Minspeak: a comparison of efficiency and effectiveness during structured use , 1985 .
[24] E Moodie,et al. AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.
[25] W. Dunn,et al. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[26] M. Scherer,et al. Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process , 2002 .
[27] M. Holm. Our Mandate for the New Millennium: Evidence-Based Practice , 2000 .
[28] R. Martin,et al. Usage and effectiveness of rails, bathing and toileting AIDS. , 1996, Occupational therapy in health care.
[29] E. Agree,et al. The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. , 1999, Social science & medicine.
[30] I. Ajzen. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .
[31] C. Wolfson,et al. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.
[32] L. Gitlin,et al. Managing Dementia at Home: The Role of Home Environmental Modifications , 1996 .
[33] C. Ryff. Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life , 1995 .
[34] E. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .
[35] J Ramsdell,et al. Compliance with social and safety recommendations in an outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment program. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.
[36] Margaret N. Deavours. Lifespace Access Profile-Assistive Technology Assessment and Planning for Individuals with Severe or Multiple Disabilities. , 1994 .
[37] M. Conner,et al. Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review , 2000 .
[38] Susan L Garber,et al. Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[39] R A Keith,et al. Functional status and health status. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[40] R. Levine,et al. How older adults perceive assistive devices in rehabilitation and home , 1993 .
[41] M J Fuhrer,et al. Assistive Technology Outcomes Research: Challenges Met and Yet Unmet , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[42] R. Keith. Conceptual basis of outcome measures. , 1995 .
[43] S. Garber,et al. Upper extremity assistive devices: assessment of use by spinal cord-injured patients with quadriplegia. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[44] L. Gitlin,et al. Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: an exploratory study. , 1995, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[45] Stephen N. Calculator,et al. AAC outcomes for children and youths with severe disabilities: when seeing is believing , 1999 .
[46] F. Heider,et al. Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .
[47] Albert M. Cook,et al. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice , 1995 .
[48] Rhoda Weiss-Lambrou. Satisfaction and comfort. , 2002 .
[49] Richard C. Simpson,et al. COMPASS: SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER SKILLS ASSESSMENT , 2003 .
[50] Gaylen Kapperman,et al. Survey of the use of Assistive Technology by Illinois Students who are Visually Impaired , 2002 .
[51] L. Gitlin,et al. Expanding caregiver ability to use environmental solutions for problems of bathing and incontinence in the elderly with dementia , 1993 .
[52] J Angelo,et al. Consumer participation in identifying research and development priorities for power wheelchair input devices and controllers. , 1995, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[53] R. McAndrew,et al. Measurement of patient-derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi-attribute scale. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[54] W. Gordon,et al. Electronic assistive devices: their impact on the quality of life of high level quadriplegic persons. , 1981, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[55] M. Rodgers,et al. Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[56] Jenny Strong,et al. Compliance with Prescribed Adaptive Equipment: A Literature Review , 2000 .
[57] Stephen Kokoska,et al. Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children , 1995 .
[58] W W Hauck,et al. A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. , 2001, The Gerontologist.
[59] R. Keith. Treatment strength in rehabilitation. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[60] Kamesh Ramakrishna. Review of "Systems Engineering Models of Human-Machine Interaction by William B. Rouse", North Holland. , 1981, SGAR.
[61] Dave L. Edyburn,et al. Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Contributions to Understanding Special Education Technology , 2001 .
[62] M E Young,et al. Assistive technology and the newly disabled adult: adaptation to wheelchair use. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[63] Marti L. Riemer-Reiss,et al. Factors Associated with Assistive Technology Discontinuance among Individuals with Disabilities , 2000 .
[64] R. Cumming,et al. Adherence to occupational therapist recommendations for home modifications for falls prevention. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.
[65] Perception of the impact of assistive devices on daily life of three individuals with quadriplegia. , 1995, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[66] M. Fuhrer. Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.
[67] Ann Buysse,et al. A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. , 2002, The Gerontologist.
[68] Joy Zabala. The SETT Framework: Critical Areas To Consider When Making Informed Assistive Technology Decisions. , 1995 .
[69] Jennifer Windsor,et al. A proposed augmentative and alternative communication model , 1990 .
[70] M. Rodda,et al. Factors Contributing to Parents' Selection of a Communication Mode to Use With Their Deaf Children , 2000, American annals of the deaf.
[71] J. Jutai,et al. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) , 2002 .
[72] B Phillips,et al. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[73] Scherer Mj,et al. A functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation , 1997 .
[74] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[75] A. C. Chambers,et al. Has Technology Been Considered? A Guide for IEP Teams. CASE/TAM Assistive Technology Policy and Practice Series. , 1997 .
[76] R. L. Kirby,et al. The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[77] J. Steyaert. Increasing the IMPACT of assistive technology , 1999 .
[78] David Wile. Why Doers Do. , 1996 .
[79] Fred D. Davis,et al. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .
[80] Denise L. Brown-Triolo. Understanding the person behind the technology. , 2002 .
[81] R A Keith,et al. Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[82] T M Gill,et al. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. , 1994, JAMA.
[83] Penny Reed,et al. Education TECH Points for Assistive Technology Planning , 1995 .
[84] M. Dijkers,et al. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[85] Serafino Buono,et al. ICF- INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH , 2003 .
[86] Frank DeRuyter,et al. The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems , 1997 .
[87] S Naumann,et al. Outcomes measurement of assistive technologies: an institutional case study. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[88] M. Scherer,et al. Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[89] G. Hendershot,et al. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.