A Review of Conceptual Models for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice

Conceptual models provide a theoretical basis for advancing scientific knowledge and improving professional practice. Although numerous assistive technology–related models have appeared in the literature, there has been no systematic effort to assess them. Six conceptual models are reviewed here: Cook and Hussey's Human-Activity–Assistive Technology model; the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; Scherer's Matching Person and Technology model; Gitlin's model of an AT user's “career”; social cognition decision-making theories; and Rogers' Perceived Attributes Theory. The models are reviewed in terms of six domains: background and goals; descriptive characteristics; indication of outcome measures; predictive characteristics; validation in the literature; and utility to assistive technology practitioners, developers, and consumers. The salient strengths and limitations are highlighted for each. Application of the models to advance theory, research, and practice is discussed.

[1]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Wheelchair Seating Aids: How Satisfied Are Consumers? , 1999 .

[2]  N. Edwards,et al.  Exploring seniors' views on the use of assistive devices in fall prevention. , 1998, Public health nursing.

[3]  R O Smith,et al.  Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[4]  L. Verbrugge,et al.  The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[5]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Factors Predicting Assistive Device Use in the Home by Older People Following Rehabilitation , 1996, Journal of aging and health.

[6]  Hugh Stewart,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  Christine Marie Geiger,et al.  The Utilization of Assistive Devices by Patients Discharged from an Acute Rehabilitation Setting , 1990 .

[8]  J. Jutai,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of Electronic Aids to Daily Living , 2000, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[9]  M Dijkers,et al.  Measuring quality of life: methodological issues. , 1999, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Rehabilitation ideology and respiratory support technology. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[12]  L. Haines,et al.  Assessment Models and Software Support for Assistive Technology Teams , 2000 .

[13]  Dave L. Edyburn Part III: A map of the technology integration process , 1998 .

[14]  J. Rogers,et al.  The Use and Effectiveness of Assistive Devices Possessed by Patients Seen in Home Care , 1987 .

[15]  R. Carter,et al.  Evaluation of health services , 2020, Economics and Australian Health Policy.

[16]  Janice Light,et al.  Do Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions Really Make a Difference?: The Challenges of Efficacy Research , 1999 .

[17]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[18]  L H Kraskowsky,et al.  Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[19]  Doris Aaronson,et al.  Computer use by the visually impaired , 1987 .

[20]  K. Preston White,et al.  Systems engineering models of human-machine interaction , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  M J Scherer,et al.  A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  Y. Robitaille,et al.  Factors Predicting the Implementation of Home Modifications Among Elderly People with Loss of Independence , 1994 .

[23]  Elaine Trefler,et al.  No Aid, an Etran, a Minspeak: a comparison of efficiency and effectiveness during structured use , 1985 .

[24]  E Moodie,et al.  AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[25]  W. Dunn,et al.  The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[26]  M. Scherer,et al.  Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process , 2002 .

[27]  M. Holm Our Mandate for the New Millennium: Evidence-Based Practice , 2000 .

[28]  R. Martin,et al.  Usage and effectiveness of rails, bathing and toileting AIDS. , 1996, Occupational therapy in health care.

[29]  E. Agree,et al.  The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[30]  I. Ajzen Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[31]  C. Wolfson,et al.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[32]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Managing Dementia at Home: The Role of Home Environmental Modifications , 1996 .

[33]  C. Ryff Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life , 1995 .

[34]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[35]  J Ramsdell,et al.  Compliance with social and safety recommendations in an outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment program. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[36]  Margaret N. Deavours Lifespace Access Profile-Assistive Technology Assessment and Planning for Individuals with Severe or Multiple Disabilities. , 1994 .

[37]  M. Conner,et al.  Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review , 2000 .

[38]  Susan L Garber,et al.  Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[39]  R A Keith,et al.  Functional status and health status. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  R. Levine,et al.  How older adults perceive assistive devices in rehabilitation and home , 1993 .

[41]  M J Fuhrer,et al.  Assistive Technology Outcomes Research: Challenges Met and Yet Unmet , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[42]  R. Keith Conceptual basis of outcome measures. , 1995 .

[43]  S. Garber,et al.  Upper extremity assistive devices: assessment of use by spinal cord-injured patients with quadriplegia. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[44]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: an exploratory study. , 1995, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[45]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  AAC outcomes for children and youths with severe disabilities: when seeing is believing , 1999 .

[46]  F. Heider,et al.  Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .

[47]  Albert M. Cook,et al.  Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice , 1995 .

[48]  Rhoda Weiss-Lambrou Satisfaction and comfort. , 2002 .

[49]  Richard C. Simpson,et al.  COMPASS: SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER SKILLS ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[50]  Gaylen Kapperman,et al.  Survey of the use of Assistive Technology by Illinois Students who are Visually Impaired , 2002 .

[51]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Expanding caregiver ability to use environmental solutions for problems of bathing and incontinence in the elderly with dementia , 1993 .

[52]  J Angelo,et al.  Consumer participation in identifying research and development priorities for power wheelchair input devices and controllers. , 1995, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[53]  R. McAndrew,et al.  Measurement of patient-derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi-attribute scale. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[54]  W. Gordon,et al.  Electronic assistive devices: their impact on the quality of life of high level quadriplegic persons. , 1981, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[55]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[56]  Jenny Strong,et al.  Compliance with Prescribed Adaptive Equipment: A Literature Review , 2000 .

[57]  Stephen Kokoska,et al.  Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children , 1995 .

[58]  W W Hauck,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. , 2001, The Gerontologist.

[59]  R. Keith Treatment strength in rehabilitation. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[60]  Kamesh Ramakrishna Review of "Systems Engineering Models of Human-Machine Interaction by William B. Rouse", North Holland. , 1981, SGAR.

[61]  Dave L. Edyburn,et al.  Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Contributions to Understanding Special Education Technology , 2001 .

[62]  M E Young,et al.  Assistive technology and the newly disabled adult: adaptation to wheelchair use. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[63]  Marti L. Riemer-Reiss,et al.  Factors Associated with Assistive Technology Discontinuance among Individuals with Disabilities , 2000 .

[64]  R. Cumming,et al.  Adherence to occupational therapist recommendations for home modifications for falls prevention. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[65]  Perception of the impact of assistive devices on daily life of three individuals with quadriplegia. , 1995, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[66]  M. Fuhrer Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[67]  Ann Buysse,et al.  A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. , 2002, The Gerontologist.

[68]  Joy Zabala The SETT Framework: Critical Areas To Consider When Making Informed Assistive Technology Decisions. , 1995 .

[69]  Jennifer Windsor,et al.  A proposed augmentative and alternative communication model , 1990 .

[70]  M. Rodda,et al.  Factors Contributing to Parents' Selection of a Communication Mode to Use With Their Deaf Children , 2000, American annals of the deaf.

[71]  J. Jutai,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) , 2002 .

[72]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[73]  Scherer Mj,et al.  A functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation , 1997 .

[74]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  A. C. Chambers,et al.  Has Technology Been Considered? A Guide for IEP Teams. CASE/TAM Assistive Technology Policy and Practice Series. , 1997 .

[76]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[77]  J. Steyaert Increasing the IMPACT of assistive technology , 1999 .

[78]  David Wile Why Doers Do. , 1996 .

[79]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[80]  Denise L. Brown-Triolo Understanding the person behind the technology. , 2002 .

[81]  R A Keith,et al.  Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[82]  T M Gill,et al.  A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. , 1994, JAMA.

[83]  Penny Reed,et al.  Education TECH Points for Assistive Technology Planning , 1995 .

[84]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Measures of social outcomes in disability research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[85]  Serafino Buono,et al.  ICF- INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH , 2003 .

[86]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems , 1997 .

[87]  S Naumann,et al.  Outcomes measurement of assistive technologies: an institutional case study. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[88]  M. Scherer,et al.  Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[89]  G. Hendershot,et al.  The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.