Using GQM and TAM to evaluate StArt - a tool that supports Systematic Review

Background: Although Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a reliable way of conducting literature review, its process is laborious and composed of repetitive activities. Hence, aiming to facilitate and support the conduction of such a process, the StArt tool was developed. Objective: As any new technology should be evaluated before its use, the objective of this paper is to present an overview of this tool and describe an evaluation that was carried out aiming at characterizing its usefulness and its ease of use. Method: The evaluation, applied twice, was designed through GQM paradigm and TAM model. The participants were graduate students who had a previous knowledge on SLR and have already applied the SLR process manually. Results: In both the evaluations the results were concentrated on the answers “extremely agree” or “quite agree” both for the usefulness and for the ease of use. Conclusion: Based on the results the further actions are: improvements related to the “quite agree” answers and the conduction of an experiment for evaluating the StArt in a deeper way. Despite these needed improvements, the results provide insights that StArt indeed helps the conduction of SLR and facilitates the application of its process.

[1]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[2]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Evidence-based software engineering , 2004, Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[3]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Teaching evidence-based software engineering to university students , 2005, 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05).

[4]  Forrest Shull,et al.  Packaging Researcher Experience to Assist Replication of Experiments , 1996 .

[5]  Francisco P. Romero,et al.  SLR-Tool: A Tool for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews , 2010, JISBD.

[6]  Oliver Laitenberger,et al.  Evaluating the usefulness and the ease of use of a Web-based inspection data collection tool , 1998, Proceedings Fifth International Software Metrics Symposium. Metrics (Cat. No.98TB100262).

[7]  David C. Howell,et al.  Unidimensional Scaling , 2004 .

[8]  Kai Petersen,et al.  Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering , 2008, EASE.

[9]  Paula Gomes Mian,et al.  Systematic Review in Software Engineering , 2005 .

[10]  Egon Berghout,et al.  The Goal/Question/Metric method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development , 1999 .

[11]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[12]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Evidence-Based Software Engineering for Practitioners , 2005, IEEE Softw..

[13]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..