A Framework for Using Data as an Engineering Tool for Sustainable Cyber-Physical Systems

Smart infrastructure has the potential to revolutionise how infrastructure is delivered, managed and automatically controlled. Data and digital twins offer an opportunity to enable this revolution and secure sustainable future smart infrastructure. In this article, we discuss data as an engineering tool and propose to use data throughout the asset’s whole life cycle from identifying the need, planning and designing to construction, operation, integration and maintenance. This requires systems thinking where focus is not limited to the problems but rather constructs a systemic perspective to understand the interrelationships between components and systems. Future infrastructure is connected, intelligent and data-driven. To enable more sustainable decision-making, we should not only consider how to integrate different infrastructure elements but also use data to monitor, learn from and inform decisions. To this end, we present a case study where several assets, such as bridges, railways and transport systems are integrated, and data are curated for the purpose of aiding climate-conscious, sustainable decision-making. An example systems architecture for integration of different digital twins is explained and benefits of this data-driven, systemic perspective are discussed.

[1]  Klaas van Breugel.  Societal Burden and Engineering Challenges of Ageing Infrastructure , 2017 .

[2]  Fei Tao,et al.  Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison , 2018, IEEE Access.

[3]  Bengt Ahlgren,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities: Interoperability and Open Data , 2016, IEEE Internet Computing.

[4]  M. Leach,et al.  Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Sustainability Science.

[5]  Carmen Gervet,et al.  Data Lake Governance: Towards a Systemic and Natural Ecosystem Analogy , 2020, Future Internet.

[6]  Fei Tao,et al.  Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[7]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[8]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Multi-stakeholder involvement and urban green space performance , 2011 .

[9]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[10]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  An Information Framework for Creating a Smart City Through Internet of Things , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[11]  Jad El-khoury,et al.  Making interoperability visible: Data visualization of cyber-physical systems development tool chains , 2016, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[12]  Un Desa.  Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[13]  Robert Ries,et al.  Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation , 2009 .

[14]  Liyin Shen,et al.  Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects , 2011 .

[15]  Aneta Vulgarakis Feljan,et al.  Knowledge Representation of Cyber-physical Systems for Monitoring Purpose , 2018 .

[16]  Patrick Hettiaratchi,et al.  Integrated infrastructure systems—A review , 2018 .

[17]  Kevin I-Kai Wang,et al.  Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues , 2020, Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[18]  Edward A. Lee.  Cyber-physical Systems -are Computing Foundations Adequate? Position Paper for Nsf Workshop on Cyber-physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap , 1998 .

[19]  Didem Gürdür.  Making Interoperability Visible : A Novel Approach to Understand Interoperability in Cyber-Physical Systems Toolchains , 2016 .

[20]  P. Minang,et al.  Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives , 2017, Environmental Management.

[21]  L. Leifer,et al.  Looking Further: Design Thinking Beyond Solution-Fixation , 2018, Understanding Innovation.

[22]  Danh Le Phuoc,et al.  Enabling IoT Ecosystems through Platform Interoperability , 2017, IEEE Software.

[23]  Roby Lynn,et al.  Part data integration in the Shop Floor Digital Twin: Mobile and cloud technologies to enable a manufacturing execution system , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[24]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Visual Computing as a Key Enabling Technology for Industrie 4.0 and Industrial Internet , 2015, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  Wilfried Sihn,et al.  Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification , 2018 .

[26]  Fabrizio Ceschin,et al.  Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions , 2016 .

[27]  André Boder,et al.  Collective intelligence: a keystone in knowledge management , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Digital twin-driven manufacturing cyber-physical system for parallel controlling of smart workshop , 2018, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[29]  Rebecca Hawkins,et al.  Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework , 2013 .

[30]  Jishnu Narayan,et al.  Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges , 2017 .

[31]  John A. Stankovic,et al.  A 21st Century Cyber-Physical Systems Education , 2017, Computer.

[32]  Reiner Anderl,et al.  Digital twin – Proof of concept , 2018 .

[33]  Song Guo,et al.  Information and Communications Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the-Art, Needs and Perspectives , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[34]  Herman van der Auweraer,et al.  Digital Twins , 2020, SEMA SIMAI Springer Series.

[35]  Meng Zhang,et al.  Digital Twin Shop-Floor: A New Shop-Floor Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing , 2017, IEEE Access.

[36]  Jad El-khoury,et al.  A Model-Driven Engineering Approach to Software Tool Interoperability based on Linked Data , 2016 .

[37]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Unified Approach , 2014 .

[38]  Ivan Stoianov,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: creating 'smart infrastructure' , 2009 .

[39]  Didem Gürdür Broo,et al.  Flourishing systems: re-envisioning infrastructure as a platform for human flourishing , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction.

[40]  Alexander Pflaum,et al.  The Evolution of Cyber-Physical Systems as a Driving Force Behind Digital Transformation , 2017, 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).

[41]  J. Hall,et al.  Infrastructure for sustainable development , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[42]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Modeling Multi-Stakeholder Multi-Objective Decisions during Public Participation in Major Infrastructure and Construction Projects: A Decision Rule Approach , 2016 .

[43]  David Grau,et al.  Circular Economy in the Built Environment: Designing, Deconstructing, and Leasing Reusable Products , 2019 .

[44]  Abdulmotaleb El Saddik,et al.  C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems , 2017, IEEE Access.

[45]  Jad El-khoury,et al.  Methodology for linked enterprise data quality assessment through information visualizations , 2019, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[46]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Enabling IoT interoperability through opportunistic smartphone-based mobile gateways , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[47]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence , 2009 .