A knowledge-Induced Operator Model

Learning systems are in the forefront of analytical investigation in the sciences. In the social sciences they occupy the study of complexity and strongly interactive world-systems. Sometimes they are diversely referred to as symbiotics and semiotics when studied in conjunction with logical expressions. In the mathematical sciences the methodology underlying learning systems with complex behavior is based on formal logic or systems analysis. In this paper relationally learning systems are shown to transcend the space-time domain of scientific investigation into the knowledge dimension. Such a knowledge domain is explained by pervasive interaction leading to integration and followed by continuous evolution as complementary processes existing between entities and systemic domains in world-systems, thus the abbreviation IIE -processes. This paper establishes a mathematical characterization of the properties of knowledge-induced process-based world-systems in the light of the epistemology of unity of knowledge signified in this paper by extensive complementarities caused by the epistemic and ontological foundation of the text of unity of knowledge, the prime example of which is the realm of the divine laws. The result is formalism in mathematical generalization of the learning phenomenon by means of an operator. This operator summarizes the properties of interaction, integration and evolution ( IIE) in the continuum domain of knowledge formation signified by universal complementarities across entities, systems and sub-systems in unifying world-systems. The opposite case of ‘de-knowledge’ and its operator is also briefly formalized.

[1]  K. Boulding.  Economics as a Moral Science , 1969 .

[2]  A. P. Robertson,et al.  Topological Vector Spaces , 1980 .

[3]  Ilya Prigogine,et al.  From Being To Becoming , 1980 .

[4]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[5]  N. Georgescu-Roegen.  The Entropy Law and the Economic Process , 1973 .

[6]  R. Lewontin.  ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[7]  J. M. Buchanan.  The bases for collective action , 1971 .

[8]  M. Heidegger.  The Basic Problems of Phenomenology , 1982 .

[9]  J. M. Henderson,et al.  Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. , 1959 .

[10]  Amos H. Hawley,et al.  Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay , 1986 .

[11]  L. A. Li︠u︡sternik,et al.  Elements of Functional Analysis , 1962 .

[12]  I. Stewart.  Does God Play Dice? The New Mathematics of Chaos , 1989 .

[13]  H. H. Schaefer,et al.  Topological Vector Spaces , 1967 .

[14]  John D. Barrow,et al.  Theories of Everything , 1991 .

[15]  Leopold A. Ziegler,et al.  Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making Under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems , 1989 .

[16]  Jon-Arild Johannessen,et al.  Organisations as social systems: the search for a systemic theory of organisational innovation processes , 1998 .

[17]  I. J. Maddox,et al.  Elements of functional analysis , 1971 .

[18]  Henry E. Kyburg,et al.  Science as Process. , 1993 .

[19]  R. Litzenberger,et al.  The Analytical Theory of Finance. , 1971 .

[20]  Wu Xue-mou,et al.  PANSYSTEMS CYBERNETICS: FRAMEWORK, METHODOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .