A Taxonomy of Vulnerable Road Users for HCI Based On A Systematic Literature Review
暂无分享,去创建一个
Andreas Butz | Kai Holländer | Mark Colley | Enrico Rukzio | E. Rukzio | A. Butz | Mark Colley | K. Holländer
[1] Harry Lahrmann,et al. Comparison of five bicycle facility designs in signalized intersections using traffic conflict studies , 2017 .
[2] Berry Eggen,et al. Feeling-of-Safety Slider: Measuring Pedestrian Willingness to Cross Roads in Field Interactions with Vehicles , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[3] José J. Cañas,et al. Behavioral and eye-movement measures to track improvements in driving skills of vulnerable road users: First-time motorcycle riders , 2011 .
[4] Natasha Merat,et al. Road user interactions in a shared space setting: Priority and communication in a UK car park , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[5] Kai Hollaender,et al. Applying the User-Centered Design Process to External Car Displays , 2018, MuC.
[6] Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al. The effects of traffic wardens on the red-light infringement behavior of vulnerable road users , 2016 .
[7] Wuhong Wang,et al. Intercultural Analyses of Time-to-Collision in Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflict on an Urban Midblock Crosswalk , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[8] Guy H. Walker,et al. Should we pass on minimum passing distance laws for cyclists? Comparing a tactical enforcement option and minimum passing distance laws using signal detection theory , 2020 .
[9] E. Rukzio,et al. A Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, AutomotiveUI.
[10] Gustav Bösehans,et al. Commuter cyclists’ risk perceptions and behaviour in the city of São Paulo , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[11] Charitha Dias,et al. Modeling pedestrians’ subjective danger perception toward personal mobility vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[12] Lenja Sorokin,et al. A Change of Perspective: Designing the Automated Vehicle as a New Social Actor in a Public Space , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[13] Azra Habibovic,et al. SAV2P: Exploring the Impact of an Interface for Shared Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians' Experience , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[14] Håkan Alm,et al. External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work , 2019, Front. Psychol..
[15] Sandra Céspedes,et al. Group Cycling Meets Technology: A Cooperative Cycling Cyber-Physical System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[16] Patrick Jachyra,et al. Urban cyclists' perspectives on post-collision behaviour change: a qualitative study , 2015 .
[17] Klaus David,et al. On the Required Movement Recognition Accuracy in Cooperative VRU Collision Avoidance Systems , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[18] Distance-Dependent eHMIs for the Interaction Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2020, AutomotiveUI.
[19] Dariu Gavrila,et al. Active Pedestrian Safety by Automatic Braking and Evasive Steering , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[20] Fawzi Nashashibi,et al. A Cooperative Car-Following/Emergency Braking System With Prediction-Based Pedestrian Avoidance Capabilities , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[21] Esko Lehtonen,et al. Evaluating Bicyclists’ Risk Perception Using Video Clips: Comparison of Frequent and Infrequent City Cyclists , 2016 .
[22] Vikram Pakrashi,et al. Analysis of heart rate variability amongst cyclists under perceived variations of risk exposure , 2015 .
[23] Rikard Fredriksson,et al. Will There Be New Communication Needs When Introducing Automated Vehicles to the Urban Context , 2017 .
[24] Andrii Matviienko,et al. Augmenting bicycles and helmets with multimodal warnings for children , 2018, MobileHCI.
[25] Josef F. Krems,et al. Deceleration parameters and their applicability as informal communication signal between pedestrians and automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[26] Chao Liu,et al. Vehicle–Bicyclist Dynamic Position Extracted From Naturalistic Driving Videos , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[27] Sowmya Somanath,et al. Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise , 2020, CHI.
[28] Tal Oron-Gilad,et al. Pedestrians’ road crossing decisions and body parts’ movements , 2017 .
[29] Martin Tomitsch,et al. Designing for Projection-based Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[30] Sahin Albayrak,et al. Vehicles of the Future: A Survey of Research on Safety Issues , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[31] A. K. Huemer,et al. Influences on anger in German urban cyclists , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[32] Mieke Haesen,et al. Back on bike: the BoB mobile cycling app for secondary prevention in cardiac patients , 2016, MobileHCI.
[33] Ralf Risser,et al. Motorcycle riders’ perceptions, attitudes and strategies: Findings from a focus group study , 2014 .
[34] Sarah Schmidt,et al. Pedestrians at the kerb – Recognising the action intentions of humans , 2009 .
[35] J. Charlton,et al. Parental role in children's road safety experiences , 2017 .
[36] Sowmya Somanath,et al. Views from the Wheelchair: Understanding Interaction between Autonomous Vehicle and Pedestrians with Reduced Mobility , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[37] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[38] Stefania Bandini,et al. Observation results on pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized intersections towards simulation , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[39] Willem Vlakveld,et al. to yield for automated , 2020 .
[40] Martin Glavin,et al. Overcoming Occlusion in the Automotive Environment—A Review , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[41] David S. Hurwitz,et al. The Impact of Commercial Parking Utilization on Cyclist Behavior in Urban Environments , 2020 .
[43] Marjan Hagenzieker,et al. Auditory localisation of conventional and electric cars: Laboratory results and implications for cycling safety , 2016 .
[44] Michael Weber,et al. Click or Hold: Usability Evaluation of Maneuver Approval Techniques in Highly Automated Driving , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[45] Özlem Şimşekoğlu,et al. The role of cultural factors and attitudes for pedestrian behaviour in an urban Turkish sample , 2013 .
[46] Tarak Gandhi,et al. Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[47] M. C. Thierry,et al. An evaluation of speed management measures in Bangladesh based upon alternative accident recording, speed measurements, and DOCTOR traffic conflict observations , 2017 .
[48] Kip Smith,et al. Modeling ratings of in-vehicle alerts to pedestrian by leveraging field operational tests data in a controlled laboratory study , 2017 .
[49] Julian Arellana,et al. Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: a latent variable approach , 2015 .
[50] Makoto Itoh,et al. Modelling overtaking strategy and lateral distance in car-to-cyclist overtaking on rural roads: A driving simulator experiment , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[51] Matthias Beggiato,et al. An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? , 2019, Applied ergonomics.
[52] Zhixiang Fang,et al. Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk , 2016 .
[53] Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al. Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[54] J. Parkin,et al. Understanding attitudes to priorities at side road junctions , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[55] Marco Dozza,et al. Understanding Bicycle Dynamics and Cyclist Behavior From Naturalistic Field Data (November 2012) , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[56] Kai Holländer. A pedestrian perspective on autonomous vehicles , 2019, IUI Companion.
[57] Magnus Hj,et al. Speed regulation by in-car active accelerator pedal Effects on driver behaviour , 2004 .
[58] Mark Vollrath,et al. Effect of complex traffic situations on route choice behaviour and driver stress in residential areas , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[59] John Cerella,et al. Cognitive skill learning: age-related differences in strategy shifts and speed of component operations. , 2004, Psychology and aging.
[60] H. Markogiannakis,et al. Motor vehicle trauma: analysis of injury profiles by road-user category , 2005, Emergency Medicine Journal.
[61] Victoria Gitelman,et al. Thinking about the history of road safety research: Past achievements and future challenges , 2014 .
[62] C. G. Keller,et al. Will the Pedestrian Cross? A Study on Pedestrian Path Prediction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[63] Florian Alt,et al. Investigating the Influence of External Car Displays on Pedestrians' Crossing Behavior in Virtual Reality , 2019, MobileHCI.
[64] Anja Katharina Huemer,et al. Cyclists’ anger experiences in traffic: The Cycling Anger Scale , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[65] Manfred Tscheligi,et al. Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience , 2014, AutomotiveUI.
[66] Tarek Sayed,et al. Modeling pedestrian-cyclist interactions in shared space using inverse reinforcement learning , 2020 .
[67] Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al. A clustering regression approach: A comprehensive injury severity analysis of pedestrian-vehicle cr , 2013 .
[68] Klaus Bengler,et al. Virtually the same? Analysing pedestrian behaviour by means of virtual reality , 2020 .
[69] John A. Albertini,et al. Deafness and Hearing Loss , 2010 .
[70] Kai Holländer,et al. InCarAR: A Design Space Towards 3D Augmented Reality Applications in Vehicles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[71] Bastian Pfleging,et al. Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2020, CHI.
[72] Changxu Wu,et al. The safety margin and perceived safety of pedestrians at unmarked roadway , 2012 .
[73] Fawzi Nashashibi,et al. Fusion of Perception and V2P Communication Systems for the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[74] Ronald Schroeter,et al. The social car: new interactive vehicular applications derived from social media and urban informatics , 2012, AutomotiveUI.
[75] Melissa Cefkin,et al. Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle External Communication System Concept: A Survey Study , 2017 .
[76] J. Wood,et al. Increasing conspicuity on night-time roads: Perspectives from cyclists and runners , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[77] David T. Hakes,et al. The development of metalinguistic abilities in children , 1980 .
[78] Daniel J. Fagnant,et al. Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .
[79] Sowmya Somanath,et al. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.
[80] Michael P. Clamann,et al. Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .
[81] Cole D Fitzpatrick,et al. Flashing yellow arrows for right turn applications: A driving simulator study and static evaluation analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[82] Bing Han,et al. Small-Scale Pedestrian Detection Based on Deep Neural Network , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[83] David R. Large,et al. Investigating the effect of urgency and modality of pedestrian alert warnings on driver acceptance and performance , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[84] Amy Hurst,et al. "just let the cane hit it": how the blind and sighted see navigation differently , 2014, ASSETS.
[85] A. Simone,et al. The safety and conspicuity of pedestrian crossing at roundabouts: The effect of median refuge island and zebra markings , 2020 .
[86] Robert Harrison,et al. A Novel Approach for the Test of Active Pedestrian Safety Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[87] Víctor Marín Puchades,et al. Evaluation of User Behavior and Acceptance of an On-Bike System , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[88] I. Walker,et al. Drivers' gaze fixations during judgements about a bicyclist's intentions , 2007 .
[89] Peter Gregor,et al. “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm , 2000, CUU '00.
[90] Lei Chen,et al. Cooperative Intersection Management: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[91] Fred Wegman,et al. Advancing sustainable safety: National road safety outlook for The Netherlands for 2005–2020 , 2008 .
[92] Susanne Boll,et al. VRoad: gesture-based interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles in virtual reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[93] T. Rundmo,et al. Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway , 2020 .
[94] Jonas Schmidtler,et al. Passing through the Bottleneck - The Potential of External Human-Machine Interfaces , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).
[95] Kari Tammi,et al. Novel Convolutional Neural Network-Based Roadside Unit for Accurate Pedestrian Localisation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[96] Kai Holländer,et al. Wizards of WoZ: using controlled and field studies to evaluate AV-pedestrian interactions , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[97] Andreas Butz,et al. Overtrust in External Cues of Automated Vehicles: An Experimental Investigation , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[98] Joceline Roge,et al. Useful visual field training: a way to improve elderly car drivers’ ability to detect vulnerable road users , 2014 .
[99] Uta Meesmann,et al. How do vulnerable road users look at road safety? International comparison based on ESRA data from 25 countries , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[100] M. Hagenzieker,et al. Do road user roles serve as social identities? Differences between self-described cyclists and car drivers , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[101] Tal Oron-Gilad,et al. Towards understanding child-pedestrians' hazard perception abilities in a mixed reality dynamic environment , 2013 .
[102] Daniel Ndiaye,et al. Driver's emotional state and detection of vulnerable road users: towards a better understanding of how emotions affect drivers' perception using cardiac and ocular metrics , 2018 .
[103] Brian Smith,et al. How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[104] Thierry Chateau,et al. Pedestrian Detection and Tracking in an Urban Environment Using a Multilayer Laser Scanner , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[105] Martin Baumann,et al. Cooperative Overtaking: Overcoming Automated Vehicles' Obstructed Sensor Range via Driver Help , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[106] Debargha Dey,et al. Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behaviour , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[107] Tim Horberry,et al. Pedestrian distraction from Smartphones: an end-user perspective on current and future countermeasures , 2020 .
[108] Klaus Bengler,et al. From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving , 2020, Inf..
[109] David Cebon,et al. Measuring the Motion of Vulnerable Road Users Relative to Moving HGVs , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[110] K. Bengler,et al. Interaction Principles for Cooperative Human-Machine Systems , 2012, it Inf. Technol..
[111] Ignacio Parra,et al. An Experimental Study on Pitch Compensation in Pedestrian-Protection Systems for Collision Avoidance and Mitigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[112] Hui Xiong,et al. A Unified Framework for Concurrent Pedestrian and Cyclist Detection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[113] Takeo Igarashi,et al. Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications , 2018 .
[114] Ashley Tews,et al. Integrating Off-Board Cameras and Vehicle On-Board Localization for Pedestrian Safety , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[115] Kira Hyldekær Janstrup,et al. Investigating the reasons behind the intention to report cycling crashes to the police and hospitals in Denmark , 2017 .
[116] Alexandra Gheorghiu,et al. Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors , 2016 .
[117] Helen Keyes,et al. Short-term cognitive conspicuity training does not improve driver detection of motorcycles at road junctions: A reply to Crundall, Howard, and Young (2017) , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[118] Sami Mynttinen,et al. Finnish novice drivers’ competences – Successful driving test candidates 2000–2009 evaluated by driving examiners , 2011 .
[119] Fridulv Sagberg,et al. Traffic hazard perception among children , 2014 .
[120] D Chisholm,et al. Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison , 2009, Injury Prevention.
[121] Manfred Tscheligi,et al. Three Strategies for Autonomous Car-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Survival Guide , 2017, HRI.
[122] John K. Tsotsos,et al. Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[123] Ho Gi Jung,et al. Precrash Dipping Nose (PCDN) Needs Pedestrian Recognition , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[124] Nguyen-Thong Dang,et al. A street-crossing simulator for studying and training pedestrians , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[125] Girish Chowdhary,et al. Intent Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2017, ArXiv.
[126] Marco Gruteser,et al. LookUp: Enabling Pedestrian Safety Services via Shoe Sensing , 2015, MobiSys.
[127] Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al. Footbridge usage in high-traffic flow highways: The intersection of safety and security in pedestrian decision-making , 2017 .
[128] Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al. An intercept study of footbridge users and non-users in Malaysia , 2020 .
[129] Jaime Sanmartín,et al. Healthy but risky: A descriptive study on cyclists’ encouraging and discouraging factors for using bicycles, habits and safety outcomes , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[130] Chao Wang,et al. Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users , 2018, AutomotiveUI.
[131] Natasha Merat,et al. Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[132] Liping Fu,et al. Analyzing injury severity factors at highway railway grade crossing accidents involving vulnerable road users: A comparative study , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.
[133] Raphael Zimmermann,et al. First Step into Visceral Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[134] A. McIntosh,et al. Cyclists’ self-reported experiences of, and attributions about, perceived aggressive behaviour while sharing roads and paths in New South Wales, Australia , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[135] Shinya Kitayama,et al. Display System for Vehicle to Pedestrian Communication , 2017 .
[136] Tom Brijs,et al. Yielding behavior and traffic conflicts at cyclist crossing facilities on channelized right-turn lanes , 2018 .
[137] Elsevier Sdol. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , 2009 .
[138] B. Thorslund,et al. Cyclist strategies and behaviour at intersections. Conscious and un-conscious strategies regarding positioning , 2020 .
[139] Yuying Jiang,et al. Manifold Siamese Network: A Novel Visual Tracking ConvNet for Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[140] Christopher Smith,et al. Exploring Interactions between Rogue Autonomous Vehicles and People , 2020, HRI.
[141] G. Cardon,et al. The implications of low quality bicycle paths on the gaze behaviour of young learner cyclists , 2017 .
[142] Guojie Ma,et al. Drivers’ recognition of pedestrian road-crossing intentions: Performance and process , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[143] David Crundall,et al. Perceptual training to increase drivers' ability to spot motorcycles at T-junctions , 2017 .
[144] Riender Happee,et al. External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions , 2019, Hum. Factors.
[145] Muztaba Fuad,et al. Comparison of Child and Adult Pedestrian Perspectives of External Features on Autonomous Vehicles Using Virtual Reality Experiment , 2019, AHFE.
[146] Maria Alice Prudêncio Jacques,et al. On-the-spot study of pedestrian crashes on Brazilian Federal District rural highways crossing urban areas , 2012 .
[147] Albrecht Schmidt,et al. Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving , 2016, IEEE Pervasive Computing.
[148] Aurélie Dommes,et al. Can simulator-based training improve street-crossing safety for elderly pedestrians? , 2012 .
[149] Ho Gi Jung,et al. A New Approach to Urban Pedestrian Detection for Automatic Braking , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[150] Klaus Bengler,et al. Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users , 2017 .
[151] Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples , 2011, TACC.
[152] Michael Weber,et al. CooperationCaptcha: On-The-Fly Object Labeling for Highly Automated Vehicles , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[153] C. Dolea,et al. World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.
[154] Tom Brijs,et al. Psychological determinants of motorcycle helmet use among young adults in Cambodia , 2014 .
[155] Julien Cestac,et al. European road users' risk perception and mobility : the SARTRE 4 survey , 2012 .
[156] Philipp Wintersberger,et al. A Novel Approach for Researching Crossing Behavior and Risk Acceptance: The Pedestrian Simulator , 2016, AutomotiveUI.
[157] Y. Ge,et al. Comparison of pedestrian behaviors between drivers and non-drivers in Chinese sample , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[158] David S. Hurwitz,et al. Influence of bicyclist presence on driver performance during automated vehicle take-over requests , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[159] J. Caird,et al. The effects of speed and orientation on recognition judgments of retro-reflectively clothed pedestrians at night , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[160] Tova Rosenbloom,et al. A within-subject design of comparison of waiting time of pedestrians before crossing three successive road crossings , 2012 .
[161] Cristina Olaverri-Monreal,et al. P2V and V2P communication for Pedestrian warning on the basis of Autonomous Vehicles , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).
[162] Antonio M. López,et al. Intention Recognition of Pedestrians and Cyclists by 2D Pose Estimation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[163] Fang Chen,et al. Same, Same but Different: How Design Requirements for an Auditory Advisory Traffic Information System Differ Between Sweden and China , 2016, AutomotiveUI.
[164] Klaus Bengler,et al. External HMIs and Their Effect on the Interaction Between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles , 2018, IHSI.
[165] Tibor Petzoldt,et al. Traffic conflicts and their contextual factors when riding conventional vs. electric bicycles , 2017 .
[166] Yahui Wang,et al. To Cross or Not to Cross: Urgency-Based External Warning Displays on Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Pedestrian Crossing Safety , 2018, AutomotiveUI.
[167] Philipp Wintersberger,et al. Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[168] Saeid Nahavandi,et al. Contextual Recurrent Predictive Model for Long-Term Intent Prediction of Vulnerable Road Users , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[169] Mark Colley,et al. Evaluating Highly Automated Trucks as Signaling Lights , 2020, AutomotiveUI.
[170] J. Olivier,et al. Bicycle helmets and risky behaviour: A systematic review , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[171] P. Salmon,et al. Road-related anger in motorcyclists versus car drivers , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[172] A. Houtenville,et al. 2017 Disability Statistics Annual Report. A Publication of the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics. , 2016 .
[173] Changxi Ma,et al. Spatial-temporal analysis of pedestrian injury severity with geographically and temporally weighted regression model in Hong Kong , 2020 .
[174] Mark Vollrath,et al. The influence of attention allocation and age on intersection accidents , 2016 .
[175] Mark Colley,et al. Towards a Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[176] Mehdi Ghatee,et al. Three-Phases Smartphone-Based Warning System to Protect Vulnerable Road Users Under Fuzzy Conditions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[177] Andreas Riener,et al. How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians?: A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.
[178] Sowmya Somanath,et al. AV-Pedestrian Interaction Design Using a Pedestrian Mixed Traffic Simulator , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.
[179] Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al. Intentions of Vulnerable Road Users—Detection and Forecasting by Means of Machine Learning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[180] Mohamed Seedat,et al. The phenomenology of being a female pedestrian in an African and an Asian city: A qualitative investigation☆ , 2006 .
[181] Andreas Butz,et al. Save the Smombies: App-Assisted Street Crossing , 2020, MobileHCI.
[182] Mark Colley,et al. Towards Inclusive External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments , 2020, CHI.
[183] Marcelo H. Ang,et al. Pedestrian Notification Methods in Autonomous Vehicles for Multi-Class Mobility-on-Demand Service , 2016, HAI.
[184] A. Constant,et al. Protecting Vulnerable Road Users from Injury , 2010, PLoS medicine.
[185] Stuart Vaughan Newstead,et al. Contributing factors to motorcycle injury crashes in Victoria, Australia , 2017 .
[186] F. Biassoni,et al. Visual exploration of pedestrian crossings by adults and children: Comparison of strategies , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[187] Mohan M. Trivedi,et al. Looking at Humans in the Age of Self-Driving and Highly Automated Vehicles , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.
[188] Ioannis Kaparias,et al. Analysing the perceptions of pedestrians and drivers to shared space , 2012 .
[189] Josef F. Krems,et al. Gap Acceptance and Time-To-Arrival Estimates as Basis for Informal Communication between Pedestrians and Vehicles , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[190] M. K. Hyde,et al. Does it matter whether friends, parents, or peers drink walk? Identifying which normative influences predict young pedestrian's decisions to walk while intoxicated , 2014 .
[191] Charles Goldenbeld,et al. Short and long term effects of moped rider training: a field experiment , 2004 .
[192] M. Hagenzieker,et al. A study in real traffic examining glance behaviour of teenage cyclists when listening to music: Results and ethical considerations , 2018 .
[193] Zhang Xi,et al. Pedestrian Path Prediction for Autonomous Driving at Un-Signalized Crosswalk Using W/CDM and MSFM , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[194] Marco Dozza,et al. Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior , 2016 .
[195] Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al. The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles , 2020, CHI.
[196] Carmen Hagemeister,et al. Comparing perception of signals in different modalities during the cycling task: A field study , 2020 .
[197] I. M. Bernhoft,et al. Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender , 2008 .
[198] Takeo Igarashi,et al. Eyes on a Car: an Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian , 2017, AutomotiveUI.
[199] S. Koppel,et al. What makes cyclists angry? The relationships between trait anger, interest in cycling and self-reported comfort levels , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[200] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[201] Marco De Angelis,et al. Negative attitudes towards cyclists influence the acceptance of an in-vehicle cyclist detection system☆ , 2017 .
[202] Haneen Farah,et al. Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[203] K. M. Lum,et al. Effect of driving experience and driving inactivity on young driver’s hazard mitigation skills , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[204] Frederick Lippman,et al. Blindness and vision impairment , 2008 .
[205] Magnus Carlsson,et al. The Effect of Schooling on Cognitive Skills , 2012, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[206] A. Anund,et al. Contributory factors to sleepiness amongst London bus drivers , 2020 .
[207] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.
[208] Vicki L. Hanson,et al. Writing about accessibility , 2015, Interactions.
[209] Mark Colley,et al. Unveiling the Lack of Scalability in Research on External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[210] Roland Siegwart,et al. Inferring Pedestrian Motions at Urban Crosswalks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[211] Nicolas Guéguen,et al. Motorcyclists’ intention to exceed the speed limit on a 90 km/h road: Effect of the type of motorcycles , 2017 .
[212] Juan Liu,et al. An Efficient Computational Architecture for a Collision Early-Warning System for Vehicles, Pedestrians, and Bicyclists , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[213] Jacques M. B. Terken,et al. Rules of conduct for autonomous vehicles , 2015, AutomotiveUI.
[214] Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia,et al. Pedestrians’ road crossing behaviour in front of automated vehicles: Results from a pedestrian simulation experiment using agent-based modelling , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[215] N. V. Nes,et al. Look where you have to go! A field study comparing looking behaviour at urban intersections using a navigation system or a printed route instruction , 2015 .
[216] Eduard Zaloshnja,et al. Incidence and Total Lifetime Costs of Motor Vehicle–Related Fatal and Nonfatal Injury by Road User Type, United States, 2005 , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.
[217] V. Sisiopiku,et al. PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIORS AT AND PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS VARIOUS PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: AN EXAMINATION BASED ON OBSERVATION AND SURVEY DATA , 2003 .
[218] Mounir Belloumi,et al. Spatio-temporal pattern of vulnerable road user’s collisions hot spots and related risk factors for injury severity in Tunisia , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[219] Mark J. King,et al. Visibility-related characteristics of crashes involving bicyclists and motor vehicles – Responses from an online questionnaire study , 2013 .
[220] Stephane Hess,et al. Modelling pedestrian crossing choice on Cape Town’s freeways: Caught between a rock and a hard place? , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[221] Anja Katharina Huemer,et al. Motivating and deterring factors for two common traffic-rule violations of cyclists in Germany , 2018 .
[222] Noel G. Thornburg. Perceptual and Motor Development in Infants and Children , 1972 .
[223] Mark Stevenson,et al. Estimating the safety benefit of separated cycling infrastructure adjusted for behavioral adaptation among drivers; an application of agent-based modelling , 2017 .
[224] Sergio A. Velastin,et al. Detection of Motorcycles in Urban Traffic Using Video Analysis: A Review , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[225] T. B. Üstün,et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.
[226] Daniel W. Carruth,et al. Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[227] Bilal Farooq,et al. Impact of Smartphone Distraction on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour: An Application of Head-Mounted Immersive Virtual Reality , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[228] Yili Liu,et al. Investigation of Driver Performance With Night Vision and Pedestrian Detection Systems—Part I: Empirical Study on Visual Clutter and Glance Behavior , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.