A Taxonomy of Vulnerable Road Users for HCI Based On A Systematic Literature Review

Recent automotive research often focuses on automated driving, including the interaction between automated vehicles (AVs) and so-called “vulnerable road users” (VRUs). While road safety statistics and traffic psychology at least define VRUs as pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists, many publications on human-vehicle interaction use the term without even defining it. The actual target group remains unclear. Since each group already poses a broad spectrum of research challenges, a one-fits-all solution seems unrealistic and inappropriate, and a much clearer differentiation is required. To foster clarity and comprehensibility, we propose a literature-based taxonomy providing a structured separation of (vulnerable) road users, designed to particularly (but not exclusively) support research on the communication between VRUs and AVs. It consists of two conceptual hierarchies and will help practitioners and researchers by providing a uniform and comparable set of terms needed for the design, implementation, and description of HCI applications.

[1]  Harry Lahrmann,et al.  Comparison of five bicycle facility designs in signalized intersections using traffic conflict studies , 2017 .

[2]  Berry Eggen,et al.  Feeling-of-Safety Slider: Measuring Pedestrian Willingness to Cross Roads in Field Interactions with Vehicles , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  José J. Cañas,et al.  Behavioral and eye-movement measures to track improvements in driving skills of vulnerable road users: First-time motorcycle riders , 2011 .

[4]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Road user interactions in a shared space setting: Priority and communication in a UK car park , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[5]  Kai Hollaender,et al.  Applying the User-Centered Design Process to External Car Displays , 2018, MuC.

[6]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  The effects of traffic wardens on the red-light infringement behavior of vulnerable road users , 2016 .

[7]  Wuhong Wang,et al.  Intercultural Analyses of Time-to-Collision in Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflict on an Urban Midblock Crosswalk , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Should we pass on minimum passing distance laws for cyclists? Comparing a tactical enforcement option and minimum passing distance laws using signal detection theory , 2020 .

[9]  E. Rukzio,et al.  A Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, AutomotiveUI.

[10]  Gustav Bösehans,et al.  Commuter cyclists’ risk perceptions and behaviour in the city of São Paulo , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[11]  Charitha Dias,et al.  Modeling pedestrians’ subjective danger perception toward personal mobility vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[12]  Lenja Sorokin,et al.  A Change of Perspective: Designing the Automated Vehicle as a New Social Actor in a Public Space , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  Azra Habibovic,et al.  SAV2P: Exploring the Impact of an Interface for Shared Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians' Experience , 2017, AutomotiveUI.

[14]  Håkan Alm,et al.  External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Sandra Céspedes,et al.  Group Cycling Meets Technology: A Cooperative Cycling Cyber-Physical System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Patrick Jachyra,et al.  Urban cyclists' perspectives on post-collision behaviour change: a qualitative study , 2015 .

[17]  Klaus David,et al.  On the Required Movement Recognition Accuracy in Cooperative VRU Collision Avoidance Systems , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Distance-Dependent eHMIs for the Interaction Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2020, AutomotiveUI.

[19]  Dariu Gavrila,et al.  Active Pedestrian Safety by Automatic Braking and Evasive Steering , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Fawzi Nashashibi,et al.  A Cooperative Car-Following/Emergency Braking System With Prediction-Based Pedestrian Avoidance Capabilities , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Esko Lehtonen,et al.  Evaluating Bicyclists’ Risk Perception Using Video Clips: Comparison of Frequent and Infrequent City Cyclists , 2016 .

[22]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  Analysis of heart rate variability amongst cyclists under perceived variations of risk exposure , 2015 .

[23]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Will There Be New Communication Needs When Introducing Automated Vehicles to the Urban Context , 2017 .

[24]  Andrii Matviienko,et al.  Augmenting bicycles and helmets with multimodal warnings for children , 2018, MobileHCI.

[25]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Deceleration parameters and their applicability as informal communication signal between pedestrians and automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[26]  Chao Liu,et al.  Vehicle–Bicyclist Dynamic Position Extracted From Naturalistic Driving Videos , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise , 2020, CHI.

[28]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Pedestrians’ road crossing decisions and body parts’ movements , 2017 .

[29]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  Designing for Projection-based Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[30]  Sahin Albayrak,et al.  Vehicles of the Future: A Survey of Research on Safety Issues , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[31]  A. K. Huemer,et al.  Influences on anger in German urban cyclists , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[32]  Mieke Haesen,et al.  Back on bike: the BoB mobile cycling app for secondary prevention in cardiac patients , 2016, MobileHCI.

[33]  Ralf Risser,et al.  Motorcycle riders’ perceptions, attitudes and strategies: Findings from a focus group study , 2014 .

[34]  Sarah Schmidt,et al.  Pedestrians at the kerb – Recognising the action intentions of humans , 2009 .

[35]  J. Charlton,et al.  Parental role in children's road safety experiences , 2017 .

[36]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Views from the Wheelchair: Understanding Interaction between Autonomous Vehicle and Pedestrians with Reduced Mobility , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[38]  Stefania Bandini,et al.  Observation results on pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized intersections towards simulation , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[39]  Willem Vlakveld,et al.  to yield for automated , 2020 .

[40]  Martin Glavin,et al.  Overcoming Occlusion in the Automotive Environment—A Review , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[41]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  The Impact of Commercial Parking Utilization on Cyclist Behavior in Urban Environments , 2020 .

[42]  Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings , 2019 .

[43]  Marjan Hagenzieker,et al.  Auditory localisation of conventional and electric cars: Laboratory results and implications for cycling safety , 2016 .

[44]  Michael Weber,et al.  Click or Hold: Usability Evaluation of Maneuver Approval Techniques in Highly Automated Driving , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[45]  Özlem Şimşekoğlu,et al.  The role of cultural factors and attitudes for pedestrian behaviour in an urban Turkish sample , 2013 .

[46]  Tarak Gandhi,et al.  Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[47]  M. C. Thierry,et al.  An evaluation of speed management measures in Bangladesh based upon alternative accident recording, speed measurements, and DOCTOR traffic conflict observations , 2017 .

[48]  Kip Smith,et al.  Modeling ratings of in-vehicle alerts to pedestrian by leveraging field operational tests data in a controlled laboratory study , 2017 .

[49]  Julian Arellana,et al.  Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: a latent variable approach , 2015 .

[50]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Modelling overtaking strategy and lateral distance in car-to-cyclist overtaking on rural roads: A driving simulator experiment , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[51]  Matthias Beggiato,et al.  An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[52]  Zhixiang Fang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk , 2016 .

[53]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[54]  J. Parkin,et al.  Understanding attitudes to priorities at side road junctions , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[55]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Understanding Bicycle Dynamics and Cyclist Behavior From Naturalistic Field Data (November 2012) , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[56]  Kai Holländer A pedestrian perspective on autonomous vehicles , 2019, IUI Companion.

[57]  Magnus Hj,et al.  Speed regulation by in-car active accelerator pedal Effects on driver behaviour , 2004 .

[58]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Effect of complex traffic situations on route choice behaviour and driver stress in residential areas , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[59]  John Cerella,et al.  Cognitive skill learning: age-related differences in strategy shifts and speed of component operations. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[60]  H. Markogiannakis,et al.  Motor vehicle trauma: analysis of injury profiles by road-user category , 2005, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[61]  Victoria Gitelman,et al.  Thinking about the history of road safety research: Past achievements and future challenges , 2014 .

[62]  C. G. Keller,et al.  Will the Pedestrian Cross? A Study on Pedestrian Path Prediction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[63]  Florian Alt,et al.  Investigating the Influence of External Car Displays on Pedestrians' Crossing Behavior in Virtual Reality , 2019, MobileHCI.

[64]  Anja Katharina Huemer,et al.  Cyclists’ anger experiences in traffic: The Cycling Anger Scale , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[65]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience , 2014, AutomotiveUI.

[66]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Modeling pedestrian-cyclist interactions in shared space using inverse reinforcement learning , 2020 .

[67]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  A clustering regression approach: A comprehensive injury severity analysis of pedestrian-vehicle cr , 2013 .

[68]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Virtually the same? Analysing pedestrian behaviour by means of virtual reality , 2020 .

[69]  John A. Albertini,et al.  Deafness and Hearing Loss , 2010 .

[70]  Kai Holländer,et al.  InCarAR: A Design Space Towards 3D Augmented Reality Applications in Vehicles , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[71]  Bastian Pfleging,et al.  Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2020, CHI.

[72]  Changxu Wu,et al.  The safety margin and perceived safety of pedestrians at unmarked roadway , 2012 .

[73]  Fawzi Nashashibi,et al.  Fusion of Perception and V2P Communication Systems for the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[74]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  The social car: new interactive vehicular applications derived from social media and urban informatics , 2012, AutomotiveUI.

[75]  Melissa Cefkin,et al.  Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle External Communication System Concept: A Survey Study , 2017 .

[76]  J. Wood,et al.  Increasing conspicuity on night-time roads: Perspectives from cyclists and runners , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[77]  David T. Hakes,et al.  The development of metalinguistic abilities in children , 1980 .

[78]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[79]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.

[80]  Michael P. Clamann,et al.  Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[81]  Cole D Fitzpatrick,et al.  Flashing yellow arrows for right turn applications: A driving simulator study and static evaluation analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[82]  Bing Han,et al.  Small-Scale Pedestrian Detection Based on Deep Neural Network , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[83]  David R. Large,et al.  Investigating the effect of urgency and modality of pedestrian alert warnings on driver acceptance and performance , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[84]  Amy Hurst,et al.  "just let the cane hit it": how the blind and sighted see navigation differently , 2014, ASSETS.

[85]  A. Simone,et al.  The safety and conspicuity of pedestrian crossing at roundabouts: The effect of median refuge island and zebra markings , 2020 .

[86]  Robert Harrison,et al.  A Novel Approach for the Test of Active Pedestrian Safety Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[87]  Víctor Marín Puchades,et al.  Evaluation of User Behavior and Acceptance of an On-Bike System , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[88]  I. Walker,et al.  Drivers' gaze fixations during judgements about a bicyclist's intentions , 2007 .

[89]  Peter Gregor,et al.  “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm , 2000, CUU '00.

[90]  Lei Chen,et al.  Cooperative Intersection Management: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[91]  Fred Wegman,et al.  Advancing sustainable safety: National road safety outlook for The Netherlands for 2005–2020 , 2008 .

[92]  Susanne Boll,et al.  VRoad: gesture-based interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles in virtual reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[93]  T. Rundmo,et al.  Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway , 2020 .

[94]  Jonas Schmidtler,et al.  Passing through the Bottleneck - The Potential of External Human-Machine Interfaces , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[95]  Kari Tammi,et al.  Novel Convolutional Neural Network-Based Roadside Unit for Accurate Pedestrian Localisation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[96]  Kai Holländer,et al.  Wizards of WoZ: using controlled and field studies to evaluate AV-pedestrian interactions , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[97]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Overtrust in External Cues of Automated Vehicles: An Experimental Investigation , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[98]  Joceline Roge,et al.  Useful visual field training: a way to improve elderly car drivers’ ability to detect vulnerable road users , 2014 .

[99]  Uta Meesmann,et al.  How do vulnerable road users look at road safety? International comparison based on ESRA data from 25 countries , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[100]  M. Hagenzieker,et al.  Do road user roles serve as social identities? Differences between self-described cyclists and car drivers , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[101]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Towards understanding child-pedestrians' hazard perception abilities in a mixed reality dynamic environment , 2013 .

[102]  Daniel Ndiaye,et al.  Driver's emotional state and detection of vulnerable road users: towards a better understanding of how emotions affect drivers' perception using cardiac and ocular metrics , 2018 .

[103]  Brian Smith,et al.  How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[104]  Thierry Chateau,et al.  Pedestrian Detection and Tracking in an Urban Environment Using a Multilayer Laser Scanner , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[105]  Martin Baumann,et al.  Cooperative Overtaking: Overcoming Automated Vehicles' Obstructed Sensor Range via Driver Help , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[106]  Debargha Dey,et al.  Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behaviour , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[107]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Pedestrian distraction from Smartphones: an end-user perspective on current and future countermeasures , 2020 .

[108]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving , 2020, Inf..

[109]  David Cebon,et al.  Measuring the Motion of Vulnerable Road Users Relative to Moving HGVs , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[110]  K. Bengler,et al.  Interaction Principles for Cooperative Human-Machine Systems , 2012, it Inf. Technol..

[111]  Ignacio Parra,et al.  An Experimental Study on Pitch Compensation in Pedestrian-Protection Systems for Collision Avoidance and Mitigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[112]  Hui Xiong,et al.  A Unified Framework for Concurrent Pedestrian and Cyclist Detection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[113]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications , 2018 .

[114]  Ashley Tews,et al.  Integrating Off-Board Cameras and Vehicle On-Board Localization for Pedestrian Safety , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[115]  Kira Hyldekær Janstrup,et al.  Investigating the reasons behind the intention to report cycling crashes to the police and hospitals in Denmark , 2017 .

[116]  Alexandra Gheorghiu,et al.  Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors , 2016 .

[117]  Helen Keyes,et al.  Short-term cognitive conspicuity training does not improve driver detection of motorcycles at road junctions: A reply to Crundall, Howard, and Young (2017) , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[118]  Sami Mynttinen,et al.  Finnish novice drivers’ competences – Successful driving test candidates 2000–2009 evaluated by driving examiners , 2011 .

[119]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Traffic hazard perception among children , 2014 .

[120]  D Chisholm,et al.  Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[121]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Three Strategies for Autonomous Car-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Survival Guide , 2017, HRI.

[122]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[123]  Ho Gi Jung,et al.  Precrash Dipping Nose (PCDN) Needs Pedestrian Recognition , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[124]  Nguyen-Thong Dang,et al.  A street-crossing simulator for studying and training pedestrians , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[125]  Girish Chowdhary,et al.  Intent Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians , 2017, ArXiv.

[126]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  LookUp: Enabling Pedestrian Safety Services via Shoe Sensing , 2015, MobiSys.

[127]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  Footbridge usage in high-traffic flow highways: The intersection of safety and security in pedestrian decision-making​ , 2017 .

[128]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  An intercept study of footbridge users and non-users in Malaysia , 2020 .

[129]  Jaime Sanmartín,et al.  Healthy but risky: A descriptive study on cyclists’ encouraging and discouraging factors for using bicycles, habits and safety outcomes , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[130]  Chao Wang,et al.  Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[131]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[132]  Liping Fu,et al.  Analyzing injury severity factors at highway railway grade crossing accidents involving vulnerable road users: A comparative study , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[133]  Raphael Zimmermann,et al.  First Step into Visceral Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles , 2017, AutomotiveUI.

[134]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Cyclists’ self-reported experiences of, and attributions about, perceived aggressive behaviour while sharing roads and paths in New South Wales, Australia , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[135]  Shinya Kitayama,et al.  Display System for Vehicle to Pedestrian Communication , 2017 .

[136]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Yielding behavior and traffic conflicts at cyclist crossing facilities on channelized right-turn lanes , 2018 .

[137]  Elsevier Sdol Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , 2009 .

[138]  B. Thorslund,et al.  Cyclist strategies and behaviour at intersections. Conscious and un-conscious strategies regarding positioning , 2020 .

[139]  Yuying Jiang,et al.  Manifold Siamese Network: A Novel Visual Tracking ConvNet for Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[140]  Christopher Smith,et al.  Exploring Interactions between Rogue Autonomous Vehicles and People , 2020, HRI.

[141]  G. Cardon,et al.  The implications of low quality bicycle paths on the gaze behaviour of young learner cyclists , 2017 .

[142]  Guojie Ma,et al.  Drivers’ recognition of pedestrian road-crossing intentions: Performance and process , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[143]  David Crundall,et al.  Perceptual training to increase drivers' ability to spot motorcycles at T-junctions , 2017 .

[144]  Riender Happee,et al.  External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[145]  Muztaba Fuad,et al.  Comparison of Child and Adult Pedestrian Perspectives of External Features on Autonomous Vehicles Using Virtual Reality Experiment , 2019, AHFE.

[146]  Maria Alice Prudêncio Jacques,et al.  On-the-spot study of pedestrian crashes on Brazilian Federal District rural highways crossing urban areas , 2012 .

[147]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving , 2016, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[148]  Aurélie Dommes,et al.  Can simulator-based training improve street-crossing safety for elderly pedestrians? , 2012 .

[149]  Ho Gi Jung,et al.  A New Approach to Urban Pedestrian Detection for Automatic Braking , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[150]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users , 2017 .

[151]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples , 2011, TACC.

[152]  Michael Weber,et al.  CooperationCaptcha: On-The-Fly Object Labeling for Highly Automated Vehicles , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[153]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[154]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Psychological determinants of motorcycle helmet use among young adults in Cambodia , 2014 .

[155]  Julien Cestac,et al.  European road users' risk perception and mobility : the SARTRE 4 survey , 2012 .

[156]  Philipp Wintersberger,et al.  A Novel Approach for Researching Crossing Behavior and Risk Acceptance: The Pedestrian Simulator , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[157]  Y. Ge,et al.  Comparison of pedestrian behaviors between drivers and non-drivers in Chinese sample , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[158]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  Influence of bicyclist presence on driver performance during automated vehicle take-over requests , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[159]  J. Caird,et al.  The effects of speed and orientation on recognition judgments of retro-reflectively clothed pedestrians at night , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[160]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  A within-subject design of comparison of waiting time of pedestrians before crossing three successive road crossings , 2012 .

[161]  Cristina Olaverri-Monreal,et al.  P2V and V2P communication for Pedestrian warning on the basis of Autonomous Vehicles , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[162]  Antonio M. López,et al.  Intention Recognition of Pedestrians and Cyclists by 2D Pose Estimation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[163]  Fang Chen,et al.  Same, Same but Different: How Design Requirements for an Auditory Advisory Traffic Information System Differ Between Sweden and China , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[164]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  External HMIs and Their Effect on the Interaction Between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles , 2018, IHSI.

[165]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  Traffic conflicts and their contextual factors when riding conventional vs. electric bicycles , 2017 .

[166]  Yahui Wang,et al.  To Cross or Not to Cross: Urgency-Based External Warning Displays on Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Pedestrian Crossing Safety , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[167]  Philipp Wintersberger,et al.  Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[168]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Contextual Recurrent Predictive Model for Long-Term Intent Prediction of Vulnerable Road Users , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[169]  Mark Colley,et al.  Evaluating Highly Automated Trucks as Signaling Lights , 2020, AutomotiveUI.

[170]  J. Olivier,et al.  Bicycle helmets and risky behaviour: A systematic review , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[171]  P. Salmon,et al.  Road-related anger in motorcyclists versus car drivers , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[172]  A. Houtenville,et al.  2017 Disability Statistics Annual Report. A Publication of the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics. , 2016 .

[173]  Changxi Ma,et al.  Spatial-temporal analysis of pedestrian injury severity with geographically and temporally weighted regression model in Hong Kong , 2020 .

[174]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  The influence of attention allocation and age on intersection accidents , 2016 .

[175]  Mark Colley,et al.  Towards a Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[176]  Mehdi Ghatee,et al.  Three-Phases Smartphone-Based Warning System to Protect Vulnerable Road Users Under Fuzzy Conditions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[177]  Andreas Riener,et al.  How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians?: A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[178]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  AV-Pedestrian Interaction Design Using a Pedestrian Mixed Traffic Simulator , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[179]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Intentions of Vulnerable Road Users—Detection and Forecasting by Means of Machine Learning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[180]  Mohamed Seedat,et al.  The phenomenology of being a female pedestrian in an African and an Asian city: A qualitative investigation☆ , 2006 .

[181]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Save the Smombies: App-Assisted Street Crossing , 2020, MobileHCI.

[182]  Mark Colley,et al.  Towards Inclusive External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments , 2020, CHI.

[183]  Marcelo H. Ang,et al.  Pedestrian Notification Methods in Autonomous Vehicles for Multi-Class Mobility-on-Demand Service , 2016, HAI.

[184]  A. Constant,et al.  Protecting Vulnerable Road Users from Injury , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[185]  Stuart Vaughan Newstead,et al.  Contributing factors to motorcycle injury crashes in Victoria, Australia , 2017 .

[186]  F. Biassoni,et al.  Visual exploration of pedestrian crossings by adults and children: Comparison of strategies , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[187]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Looking at Humans in the Age of Self-Driving and Highly Automated Vehicles , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[188]  Ioannis Kaparias,et al.  Analysing the perceptions of pedestrians and drivers to shared space , 2012 .

[189]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Gap Acceptance and Time-To-Arrival Estimates as Basis for Informal Communication between Pedestrians and Vehicles , 2017, AutomotiveUI.

[190]  M. K. Hyde,et al.  Does it matter whether friends, parents, or peers drink walk? Identifying which normative influences predict young pedestrian's decisions to walk while intoxicated , 2014 .

[191]  Charles Goldenbeld,et al.  Short and long term effects of moped rider training: a field experiment , 2004 .

[192]  M. Hagenzieker,et al.  A study in real traffic examining glance behaviour of teenage cyclists when listening to music: Results and ethical considerations , 2018 .

[193]  Zhang Xi,et al.  Pedestrian Path Prediction for Autonomous Driving at Un-Signalized Crosswalk Using W/CDM and MSFM , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[194]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior , 2016 .

[195]  Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al.  The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles , 2020, CHI.

[196]  Carmen Hagemeister,et al.  Comparing perception of signals in different modalities during the cycling task: A field study , 2020 .

[197]  I. M. Bernhoft,et al.  Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender , 2008 .

[198]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Eyes on a Car: an Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian , 2017, AutomotiveUI.

[199]  S. Koppel,et al.  What makes cyclists angry? The relationships between trait anger, interest in cycling and self-reported comfort levels , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[200]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[201]  Marco De Angelis,et al.  Negative attitudes towards cyclists influence the acceptance of an in-vehicle cyclist detection system☆ , 2017 .

[202]  Haneen Farah,et al.  Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[203]  K. M. Lum,et al.  Effect of driving experience and driving inactivity on young driver’s hazard mitigation skills , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[204]  Frederick Lippman,et al.  Blindness and vision impairment , 2008 .

[205]  Magnus Carlsson,et al.  The Effect of Schooling on Cognitive Skills , 2012, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[206]  A. Anund,et al.  Contributory factors to sleepiness amongst London bus drivers , 2020 .

[207]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[208]  Vicki L. Hanson,et al.  Writing about accessibility , 2015, Interactions.

[209]  Mark Colley,et al.  Unveiling the Lack of Scalability in Research on External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[210]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Inferring Pedestrian Motions at Urban Crosswalks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[211]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  Motorcyclists’ intention to exceed the speed limit on a 90 km/h road: Effect of the type of motorcycles , 2017 .

[212]  Juan Liu,et al.  An Efficient Computational Architecture for a Collision Early-Warning System for Vehicles, Pedestrians, and Bicyclists , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[213]  Jacques M. B. Terken,et al.  Rules of conduct for autonomous vehicles , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[214]  Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia,et al.  Pedestrians’ road crossing behaviour in front of automated vehicles: Results from a pedestrian simulation experiment using agent-based modelling , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[215]  N. V. Nes,et al.  Look where you have to go! A field study comparing looking behaviour at urban intersections using a navigation system or a printed route instruction , 2015 .

[216]  Eduard Zaloshnja,et al.  Incidence and Total Lifetime Costs of Motor Vehicle–Related Fatal and Nonfatal Injury by Road User Type, United States, 2005 , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[217]  V. Sisiopiku,et al.  PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIORS AT AND PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS VARIOUS PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: AN EXAMINATION BASED ON OBSERVATION AND SURVEY DATA , 2003 .

[218]  Mounir Belloumi,et al.  Spatio-temporal pattern of vulnerable road user’s collisions hot spots and related risk factors for injury severity in Tunisia , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[219]  Mark J. King,et al.  Visibility-related characteristics of crashes involving bicyclists and motor vehicles – Responses from an online questionnaire study , 2013 .

[220]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Modelling pedestrian crossing choice on Cape Town’s freeways: Caught between a rock and a hard place? , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[221]  Anja Katharina Huemer,et al.  Motivating and deterring factors for two common traffic-rule violations of cyclists in Germany , 2018 .

[222]  Noel G. Thornburg Perceptual and Motor Development in Infants and Children , 1972 .

[223]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Estimating the safety benefit of separated cycling infrastructure adjusted for behavioral adaptation among drivers; an application of agent-based modelling , 2017 .

[224]  Sergio A. Velastin,et al.  Detection of Motorcycles in Urban Traffic Using Video Analysis: A Review , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[225]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[226]  Daniel W. Carruth,et al.  Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[227]  Bilal Farooq,et al.  Impact of Smartphone Distraction on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour: An Application of Head-Mounted Immersive Virtual Reality , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[228]  Yili Liu,et al.  Investigation of Driver Performance With Night Vision and Pedestrian Detection Systems—Part I: Empirical Study on Visual Clutter and Glance Behavior , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.