Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results

Six land surface models and five global hydrological models participate in a model intercomparison project [Water Model Intercomparison Project (WaterMIP)], which for the first time compares simulation results of these different classes of models in a consistent way. In this paper, the simulation setup is described and aspects of the multimodel global terrestrial water balance are presented. All models were run at 0.58 spatial resolution for the global land areas for a 15-yr period (1985–99) using a newly developed global meteorological dataset. Simulated global terrestrial evapotranspiration, excluding Greenland and Antarctica, ranges from 415 to 586 mm yr 21 (from 60 000 to 85 000 km 3 yr 21 ), and simulated runoff ranges from 290 to 457 mm yr 21 (from 42 000 to 66 000 km 3 yr 21 ). Both the mean and median runoff fractions for the land surface models are lower than those of the global hydrological models, although the range is wider. Significant simulation differences between land surface and global hydrological models are found to be caused by the snow scheme employed. The physically based energy balance approach used by land surface models generally results in lower snow water equivalent values than the conceptual degreeday approach used by global hydrological models. Some differences in simulated runoff and evapotranspiration are explained by model parameterizations, although the processes included and parameterizations used are not distinct to either land surface models or global hydrological models. The results show that differences between models are a major source of uncertainty. Climate change impact studies thus need to use not only multiple climate models but also some other measure of uncertainty (e.g., multiple impact

[1]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century , 2011 .

[2]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  Impact of a Statistical Bias Correction on the Projected Hydrological Changes Obtained from Three GCMs and Two Hydrology Models , 2011 .

[3]  Nigel W. Arnell,et al.  Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis , 2011 .

[4]  J. Rockström,et al.  Greening the global water system , 2010 .

[5]  C. Taylor.  Feedbacks on convection from an African wetland , 2010 .

[6]  Sujan Koirala.  Explicit representation of groundwater process in a global-scale land surface model to improve hydrological predictions , 2010 .

[7]  N. Arnell,et al.  Uncertainty in the estimation of potential evapotranspiration under climate change , 2009 .

[8]  G. Meehl,et al.  Decadal prediction: Can it be skillful? , 2009 .

[9]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  Effects of Precipitation Uncertainty on Discharge Calculations for Main River Basins , 2009 .

[10]  B. Hurk,et al.  A Revised Hydrology for the ECMWF Model: Verification from Field Site to Terrestrial Water Storage and Impact in the Integrated Forecast System , 2009 .

[11]  W. Lucht,et al.  Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system , 2008 .

[12]  S. Kanae,et al.  An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – Part 1: Model description and input meteorological forcing , 2008 .

[13]  S. Kanae,et al.  An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – Part 2: Applications and assessments , 2008 .

[14]  Lucas Menzel,et al.  A global comparison of four potential evapotranspiration equations and their relevance to stream flow modelling in semi-arid environments , 2008 .

[15]  FIRST RESULTS FROM INTERCOMPARISON OF SURFACE WATER AVAILABILITY MODULES , 2008 .

[16]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[17]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  GSWP-2 Multimodel Analysis and Implications for Our Perception of the Land Surface , 2006 .

[18]  A. Sterl,et al.  The ERA‐40 re‐analysis , 2005 .

[19]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high‐resolution grids , 2005 .

[20]  N. Arnell.  Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios , 2004 .

[21]  Stefan Hagemann,et al.  Improving a subgrid runoff parameterization scheme for climate models by the use of high resolution data derived from satellite observations , 2003 .

[22]  D. Mocko,et al.  Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS phase 2(e) - 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons , 2003 .

[23]  Kumiko Takata,et al.  Development of the minimal advanced treatments of surface interaction and runoff , 2003 .

[24]  K. Taylor,et al.  An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project , 2003 .

[25]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability , 2003 .

[26]  Richard Essery,et al.  Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme , 2003 .

[27]  Jennifer C. Adam,et al.  Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias , 2003 .

[28]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations , 2002 .

[29]  Petra Döll,et al.  Global modeling of irrigation water requirements , 2002 .

[30]  Petra Döll,et al.  Validation of a new global 30-min drainage direction map , 2002 .

[31]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Climate Variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate , 2000 .

[32]  A. J. Dolman,et al.  The Pilot Phase of the Global Soil Wetness Project , 1999 .

[33]  Nigel W. Arnell,et al.  A simple water balance model for the simulation of streamflow over a large geographic domain , 1999 .

[34]  K. J. Sene,et al.  A Grid-Based Approach to Water Scarcity Estimates for Eastern and Southern Africa , 1999 .

[35]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[36]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[37]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Recent progress and results from the project for the intercomparison of landsurface parameterization schemes , 1998 .

[38]  Jan Polcher,et al.  Modelling root water uptake in a complex land surface scheme coupled to a GCM , 1998 .

[39]  Stefan Hagemann,et al.  A parametrization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale , 1997 .

[40]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[41]  Jan Polcher,et al.  COMPARING THREE LAND SURFACE SCHEMES USED IN GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS , 1996 .

[42]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[43]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .