Use of a Proximal Humeral Locking Plate for Complex Ankle and Hindfoot Fusion.

Arthrodesis of the ankle and hindfoot in the setting of major deformity is challenging and associated with substantial risks. Patients often have significant comorbidities that lead to unforgiving soft tissues, poor vascularity, and poor bone quality. This creates the high-risk scenario of poor wound healing and poor implant fixation. Complications can be devastating, leading to loss of the limb and sepsis. The use of locking plate technology might provide biomechanical and operative technique advantages in such patients. We retrospectively assessed the results of the modified use of the PHILOS(™) (Synthes(®), Zuchwil, Switzerland) proximal humeral locking plate in 21 patients (11 males, 10 females; mean age 56.1 years, range 25 to 74 years) who had undergone complex fusions, including tibiotalar (n = 4), tibiocalcaneal (n = 7), or tibiotalocalcaneal (n =10) fusions. The average follow-up period was 14.6 (median 10, range 6 to 49) months. Of the 21 fusions, 18 achieved union (85.7%) at an average period of 4.8 (median 4.3, range 3 to 12) months. The overall deep infection rate was 14.3%. Overall, 17 of the 21 patients (81%) were satisfied with the result (good to excellent), 1 reported the result was fair (4.8%), and 3 patients developed nonunion and were dissatisfied with the procedure (14.3%). The present study is the largest series to date of patients undergoing complex ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis with the use of a proximal humeral locking plate and confirms previous findings that the technique is reliable with union, satisfaction, and complication rates comparable to those of other techniques.

[1]  M. Easley,et al.  Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery , 2012 .

[2]  I. van den Akker-Scheek,et al.  Hemiarthroplasty versus angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: design of a randomized controlled trial , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[3]  Chettiar Krissen,et al.  Tibio-talo-calcaneo fusion using a locked intramedullary compressive nail. , 2011, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[4]  L. Didomenico,et al.  Posterior approach using anterior ankle arthrodesis locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. , 2011, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[5]  B. Hutchinson,et al.  Distal Femoral Locking Plates for Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusions in the Charcot Ankle: A retrospective study , 2011 .

[6]  Changqing Zhang,et al.  [Ankle arthrodesis by lateral malleolus osteotomy and internal fixation with locking proximal humeral plate]. , 2011, Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Irrgang,et al.  Retrograde ankle arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. , 2011, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[8]  L. Schon,et al.  Periarticular locking plate vs intramedullary nail for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. , 2011, American journal of orthopedics.

[9]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Minimally Invasive Locked Plating of Distal Tibia Fractures is Safe and Effective , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  D. Lindsey,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of blade plate and intramedullary nail fixation for tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis. , 2010, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  W. Mcdonald Rigidity comparison of locking plate and intramedullary fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. , 2009, Foot & ankle international.

[12]  John T. Campbell,et al.  Blade Plate Compared with Locking Plate for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: A Cadaver Study , 2008, Foot & ankle international.

[13]  R. M. Greiwe,et al.  Locking Plate Technology – Current Concepts , 2010, The journal of knee surgery.

[14]  S. Raikin,et al.  The Modified Use of a Proximal Humeral Locking Plate for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[15]  P. Wood,et al.  Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  V. Bühren,et al.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a short-term, prospective study. , 2006, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[17]  Erik N. Kubiak,et al.  Biomechanics of Locked Plates and Screws , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[18]  L. Schon,et al.  Intramedullary rod fixation compared with blade-plate-and-screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  M. Wagner,et al.  General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. , 2003, Injury.

[20]  Michael Schütz,et al.  Revolution in plate osteosynthesis: new internal fixator systems , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[21]  A. Cracchiolo,et al.  The Use of a 95° Blade Plate and a Posterior Approach to Achieve Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis , 2002 .

[22]  A. Cracchiolo,et al.  The use of a 95 degree blade plate and a posterior approach to achieve tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[23]  P. Cooper Complications of ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  R. Adelaar,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Ankle Arthrodesis Techniques: Crossed Screws vs. Blade Plate , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  Loretta B. Chou,et al.  Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis , 2000, Foot & ankle international.

[26]  A. Cracchiolo,et al.  The Results of a Primary and Staged Pantalar Arthrodesis and Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis in Adult Patients , 2000, Foot & ankle international.

[27]  M. Pinzur Ankle Fusion With a Retrograde Locked Intramedullary Nail , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[28]  J. Nunley,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Intramedullary Nail and Crossed Lag Screw Fixation for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[29]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Bone plate fixation: an evaluation of interface contact area and force of the dynamic compression plate (DCP) and the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) applied to cadaveric bone. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[30]  Judith W. Smith,et al.  Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for Ankle Arthrodesis , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[31]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Tibiocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Nonbraceable Neuropathic Ankle Deformity , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[32]  M. Myerson,et al.  Pantalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis of the ankle and hindfoot. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  K. A. Johnson,et al.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for arthritis and deformity of the hind part of the foot. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.