Dynamic threshold adjustment in a proximity-based location tracking system using reference modules

In recent years, location tracking systems have become important in areas such as transportation, shopping, logistics and medicine. One of the most recent approaches are proximity-based location tracking systems, which use the received signal strength (RSSI) measured between a sender and an anchor module. The advantages of these systems are high scalability, minimal calibration effort and low costs. However, there are also disadvantages e.g. the fluctuating signal strength under certain circumstances in the environment. To detect, if an object has entered a predefined region, the RSSI must exceed a specified threshold. When the current signal fluctuates due to obstacles (other objects, people, etc.) the static threshold does not apply for the defined region any longer. In this case automatic adjustments of the threshold are made with the help of a reference module. Various factors are measured between reference, anchor as well as a sender module and subsequently used to correct the static threshold. The dynamic adjustment was tested through three experiments and showed satisfactory results concerning the hypotheses. For further research, additional factors might need to be included to make the proposed method more dynamic and responsive to the environment.

[1]  Jorge Cabral,et al.  Path loss exponent analysis in Wireless Sensor Networks: Experimental evaluation , 2013, 2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).

[2]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Using proximity and quantized RSS for sensor localization in wireless networks , 2003, WSNA '03.

[3]  Nisheeth Shrivastava,et al.  Target tracking with binary proximity sensors , 2009, TOSN.

[4]  Jeung-Yoon Choi,et al.  On target tracking with binary proximity sensors , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[5]  Larry J. Greenstein,et al.  An empirically based path loss model for wireless channels in suburban environments , 1999, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[6]  Hao Hu,et al.  Transfer learning for WiFi-based indoor localization , 2008, AAAI 2008.

[7]  Aleksandar Neskovic,et al.  Modern approaches in modeling of mobile radio systems propagation environment , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Christopher Zimmer,et al.  Improving the precision of RSSI-based low-energy localization using path loss exponent estimation , 2014, 2014 11th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication (WPNC).

[9]  Stefan Savage,et al.  On the empirical performance of self-calibrating WiFi location systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[10]  Gul A. Agha,et al.  Poster abstract: cooperative tracking with binary-detection sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[11]  Konstantinos N. Plataniotis,et al.  WLAN Positioning Systems: Principles and Applications in Location-Based Services , 2012 .

[12]  Paul J. M. Havinga,et al.  On the calibration and performance of RSS-based localization methods , 2010, 2010 Internet of Things (IOT).

[13]  R. Mardeni,et al.  Indoor empirical path loss prediction model for 2.4 GHz 802.11n network , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering.

[14]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..