Confidence Interval or P-Value?

SUMMARY Background: An understanding of p-values and confidence intervals is necessary for the evaluation of scientific articles. This article will inform the reader of the meaning and interpretation of these two statistical concepts. Methods: The uses of these two statistical concepts and the differences between them are discussed on the basis of a selective literature search concerning the methods employed in scientific articles. Results/Conclusions: P-values in scientific studies are used to determine whether a null hypothesis formulated before the performance of the study is to be accepted or rejected. In exploratory studies, p-values enable the recognition of any statistically noteworthy findings. Confidence intervals provide information about a range in which the true value lies with a certain degree of probability, as well as about the direction and strength of the demonstrated effect. This enables conclusions to be drawn about the statistical plausibility and clinical relevance of the study findings. It is often useful for both statistical measures to be reported in scientific articles, because they provide complementary types of information. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106(19): 335–9 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0335

[1]  N Heddle,et al.  Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  A R Feinstein,et al.  P-values and confidence intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  M. Gardner,et al.  Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. , 1986, British medical journal.

[4]  Janet L. Peacock,et al.  Interpreting statistics with confidence , 2002 .

[5]  John Simes,et al.  Improving interpretation of clinical studies by use of confidence levels, clinical significance curves, and risk-benefit contours , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[7]  N Heddle,et al.  Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[8]  N. Reid,et al.  Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[9]  David Moher,et al.  Das CONSORT Statement: Überarbeitete Empfehlungen zur Qualitätsverbesserung von Reports randomisierter Studien im Parallel-Design , 2004 .

[10]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[11]  Medicina Nei Secoli La Redazione No Abstract Available , 2005 .

[12]  Timothy T Houle,et al.  Importance of Effect Sizes for the Accumulation of Knowledge , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[13]  Mary Lou V. H. Greenfield,et al.  A Statistics Primer , 1998 .