An Optimized Feed-forward Artificial Neural Network Topology to Support Radiologists in Breast Lesions Classification

Introduction and objective: Computer Aided Decision (CAD) systems based on Medical Imaging could support radiologists in classifying malignant regions from benign ones, in the field of investigation for breast cancer detection. This decision may often follow a previous procedure dedicated to the earlier identification of Regions Of Interest (ROI) containing still unclassified lesions. Materials and methods: Materials comprise features extracted from magnetic resonance (MR) images representing morphological properties of lesions. The Regions Of Interest identified by a previous automatic procedure validated by radiologists of the University of Bari Aldo Moro (Italy), authors of this work, 134 from 600 slices considered of interest, because they contain still unclassified damaged areas. Several techniques were tested for ROI segmentation and classification. In particular, it can be shown that the same procedures for lesioned-area discrimination were also useful for malignancy classification of lesions, themselves. In particular, MR images were processed with different image processing techniques for ROI extraction, which were, ultimately, described by morphological features, such as circularity, aspect ratio, solidity and convexity. Finally, we discuss a procedure to design a feed-forward supervised artificial neural networks (ANN) architecture based on an evolutionary strategy. In a similar approach, different ANN topologies were tested in order to find the best in terms of mean accuracy for several iterations of training, validation and test. In particular, for each topology, the training, validation and test sets were constructed using 100 random permutations of the dataset, from which the average performances were calculated. Results: The performance of the best ANN architecture, trained using a training set of 82 samples (equally divided between malignant and benign lesions) from the 134 samples available in the whole dataset, were evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: Testing determined that the supervised ANN approach is consistent and reveals good performance; in particular, the optimal ANN topology found through an evolutionary strategy showed high generalization on the mean performance indexes regardless of training, validation and test sets applied, showing good performances in terms of both accuracy and sensitivity, permitting correct classification of the true malignant lesions.

[1]  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua,et al.  Hybrid Data Ananlysis Methods and Artificial Neural Network Design in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: IDEST Experience , 2005, International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06).

[2]  W. N. Street,et al.  Breast cytology diagnosis with digital image analysis. , 1993, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[3]  Heywang-Köbrunner Sh,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm , 1993, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  Scott Fields,et al.  Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[7]  L. Kalisher,et al.  Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[8]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[10]  Carey E. Priebe,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY , 1993 .

[11]  W. N. Street,et al.  Computer-derived nuclear features distinguish malignant from benign breast cytology. , 1995, Human pathology.

[12]  Hans H Schild,et al.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  I. Gribbestad,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1992, Acta oncologica.

[14]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  W. N. Street,et al.  Image analysis and machine learning applied to breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. , 1995, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[16]  Michele Telegrafo,et al.  MR evaluation of breast lesions obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) and correlations with histological findings. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Sibel Kul,et al.  Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Wei Huang,et al.  Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. , 2004, Radiology.

[19]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua,et al.  Evolutionary approach to inverse planning in coplanar radiotherapy , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI of breast tumors , 2000, European Radiology.

[22]  William Nick Street,et al.  Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Via Linear Programming , 1995, Oper. Res..

[23]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast , 2002, European Radiology.

[24]  S G Orel,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  Dennis G. Zill,et al.  Advanced Engineering Mathematics , 2021, Technometrics.

[26]  W. N. Street,et al.  Machine learning techniques to diagnose breast cancer from image-processed nuclear features of fine needle aspirates. , 1994, Cancer letters.

[27]  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua Three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy for automatic polyps detection by artificial neural network approach: New tests on an enlarged cohort of polyps , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[28]  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua,et al.  A Novel Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Approach to Artificial Neural Network Topology Optimisation: The Breast Cancer Classification Problem , 2006, The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings.

[29]  G. Torre,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation , 2010, La radiologia medica.

[30]  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua,et al.  Developing optimal input design strategies in cancer systems biology with applications to microfluidic device engineering , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  David B. Fogel An information criterion for optimal neural network selection , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.