Using Expected Information Gain to Design Aerothermal Model Calibration Experiments

The design of hypersonic air vehicles involves coupled, multi-physics interactions, which are predicted through computational models of various levels of fidelity and accuracy. To reduce uncertainty and improve predictive capability, these models are calibrated with experimental data. Since the number of experiments is often limited, especially those conducted for structures undergoing the combined loading of hypersonic flight, optimal data collection is of great importance for uncertainty reduction and model validation. In this research, the maximum expected information gain is used to determine which wind tunnel specimen geometry, instrumentation locations, and observables are projected to be most informative for Bayesian calibration of the uncertain parameters of an aerothermal model. Higher fidelity simulations and synthetic experimental data are used to measure and compare the actual information gain from optimal designs to the expected information gain. It was observed that geometries and instrumentation locations at the limits of the design space provided the maximum expected information gain. Additionally, tests to measure the output of the furthest downstream model in the Bayesian network were favored due their ability to calibrate the full set of uncertain parameters.

[1]  D. Lindley On a Measure of the Information Provided by an Experiment , 1956 .

[2]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[3]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Bayesian Calibration of Aerothermal Models for Hypersonic Air Vehicles , 2013 .

[4]  H. Heyer,et al.  Information and Sufficiency , 1982 .

[5]  S. Walker Invited comment on the paper "Slice Sampling" by Radford Neal , 2003 .

[6]  H. Wynn,et al.  Maximum entropy sampling and optimal Bayesian experimental design , 2000 .

[7]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[8]  Xun Huan,et al.  Simulation-based optimal Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  Development and validation of a first principles fluid-thermal multi-physics solver for hypersonic boundary layer heat transfer problems , 2011 .

[10]  Andrew R. Crowell,et al.  Hypersonic Aerothermoelastic Response Prediction of Skin Panels Using Computational Fluid Dynamic Surrogates , 2011 .

[11]  Gabriel Terejanu,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Approach to Optimally Calibrate Approximate Models , 2012 .

[12]  Michael P. H. Stumpf,et al.  Maximizing the Information Content of Experiments in Systems Biology , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Bin Liang,et al.  ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN MECHANICS COMPUTATIONAL MODELS , 2011 .

[14]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (Haldar, Mahadevan) , 1999 .

[15]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Error Quantification and Confidence Assessment of Aerothermal Model Predictions for Hypersonic Aircraft (Preprint) , 2012 .

[16]  K. J. Ryan,et al.  Estimating Expected Information Gains for Experimental Designs With Application to the Random Fatigue-Limit Model , 2003 .

[17]  Holt Ashley,et al.  Piston Theory-A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician , 1956 .

[18]  L. R. Hunt,et al.  Aerothermal tests of spherical dome protuberances on a flat plate at a Mach number of 6.5 , 1986 .

[19]  B. Smarslok,et al.  A Pre-Validation Study on Supersonic Wind Tunnel Data Collected from Legacy Aerothermal Experiments , 2014 .