Effect of light and nitrogen supply on internal C:N balance and control of root-to-shoot biomass allocation in grapevine

Theoretical plant growth models postulate that the relative rates of shoot and root growth are largely modulated by signals related to carbon and nitrogen status of the plant. To test this experimentally, 6-week-old vegetative cuttings of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv Merlot) were grown aeroponically in different controlled conditions of irradiance (13.8, 8.4 and 5.3 mol PAR m −2 day −1 ) and/or nitrogen nutrition (0.15, 1.20 and 7.11 mM N). Total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC) and amino acids (FAA) in leaves and roots were analysed 0, 6 and 28 days after treatment initiation. Both whole-plant biomass accumulation as well as C and N contents were highly responsive to light and N availability. At day 28, plant dry weight was significantly reduced in shaded vines (−35% of that of the control plants) and stimulated under the high irradiance environment (+30%). Deprivation of N enhanced root growth (+51%) at the expense of above-ground growth, whereas leaf dry weight was significantly greater in the high-N treatment than in the control. Vines grown under low-N and high irradiance conditions had the highest root-to-shoot ratios and those grown under low light and high N the lowest. Finally, redistribution of biomass among vegetative vine parts was significantly related to different indicators of the vine C:N status measured either at the whole-plant (N concentration) or at the organ level (TNC:FAA ratio), suggesting that root-to-shoot biomass partitioning was controlled by some aspect of plant C:N balance. Such relationships will be useful to improve allocation rules in a process-based growth model of grapevine. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. Thornley A Balanced Quantitative Model for Root: Shoot Ratios in Vegetative Plants , 1972 .

[2]  M. Paul,et al.  Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source:sink imbalance , 1997 .

[3]  R. L. Davidson Effects of Soil Nutrients and Moisture on Root/Shoot Ratios in Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L , 1969 .

[4]  A. McDonald,et al.  Plant nutrition, dry matter gain and partitioning at the whole-plant level. , 1996, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  C. Engels Effect of Root and Shoot Meristem Temperature on Shoot to Root Dry Matter Partitioning and the Internal Concentrations of Nitrogen and Carbohydrates in Maize and Wheat , 1994 .

[6]  J. Gaudillère,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen partitioning in either fruiting or non-fruiting grapevines: effects of nitrogen limitation before and after veraison , 2002 .

[7]  J. Wilson A review of evidence on the control of shoot: root ratio , 1988 .

[8]  A. Palliotti,et al.  Effect of Shading on Vine Morphology and Productivity and Leaf Gas Exchange Characteristics in Grapevines in the Field , 1995, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[9]  I. R. Johnson A Model of the Partitioning of Growth between the Shoots and Roots of Vegetative Plants , 1985 .

[10]  D. Hilbert,et al.  Optimization of Plant Root: Shoot Ratios and Internal Nitrogen Concentration , 1990 .

[11]  G. Ågren,et al.  The Influence of Plant Nutrition on Biomass Allocation. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  Growth and shoot: Root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability , 1995 .

[13]  R. Merckx,et al.  The effect of different levels of N limitation on sugars, amino acids, growth and biomass partitioning in broadbean (Vicia faba L.) , 1996 .

[14]  M. Stitt,et al.  Understanding allocation to shoot and root growth will require molecular information about which compounds act as signals for the plant nutrient status, and how meristem activity and cellular growth are regulated: Opinion , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[15]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review , 2000 .

[16]  E. Volkenburgh Leaf expansion – an integrating plant behaviour , 1999 .

[17]  Mark Stitt,et al.  Accumulation of nitrate in the shoot acts as a signal to regulate shoot‐root allocation in tobacco† , 1997 .

[18]  K. Rajasekaran,et al.  Fruiting Cuttings: Revised Method for Producing Test Plants of Grapevine Cultivars , 1981, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[19]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  A Shoot:Root Partitioning Model , 1982 .

[20]  G. Neumann,et al.  Response of shoot and root growth to supply of different nitrogen forms is not related to carbohydrate and nitrogen status of tobacco plants , 2001 .

[21]  Lisong Chen,et al.  Carbon Assimilation and Carbohydrate Metabolism of `Concord' Grape (Vitis labrusca L.) Leaves in Response to Nitrogen Supply , 2003 .

[22]  L. Williams,et al.  Partitioning of Dry Weight, Nitrogen, and Potassium in Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevines From Anthesis Until Harvest , 1991, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[23]  P. Lombard,et al.  Effect of shading and nitrogen source on growth, tissue ammonium and nitrate status, and inflorescence necrosis in Pinot noir grapevines , 1996 .

[24]  E. Smolders,et al.  The role of free sugars and amino acids in the regulation of biomass partitioning and plant growth , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[25]  R. Dewar,et al.  Sink feedback regulation of photosynthesis in vines: measurements and a model. , 2001, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  E. Beck Regulation of shoot/root ratio by cytokinins from roots inUrtica dioica: Opinion , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[27]  J. Coleman,et al.  Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  S. Cohen,et al.  Synthesis of a fluorescent derivatizing reagent, 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate, and its application for the analysis of hydrolysate amino acids via high-performance liquid chromatography. , 1993, Analytical biochemistry.

[29]  Roderick C. Dewar,et al.  Carbon Allocation in Trees: a Review of Concepts for Modelling , 1994 .

[30]  B. Shipley,et al.  The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation , 2002 .

[31]  Allocation of carbon and nitrogen as a function of the internal nitrogen status of a plant: Modelling allocation under non-steady-state situations , 1993 .

[32]  I. F. Wardlaw,et al.  Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[33]  P. Vivin,et al.  A SOURCE/SINK MODEL TO SIMULATE SEASONAL ALLOCATION OF CARBON IN GRAPEVINE , 2002 .

[34]  Ayalsew Zerihun,et al.  Biomass distribution and nitrate assimilation in response to N supply for Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon on five Vitis rootstock genotypes , 2002 .

[35]  G. Coruzzi,et al.  Nitrogen and carbon nutrient and metabolite signaling in plants. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[36]  H. Lambers,et al.  Interactive effects of nitrogen and irradiance on growth and partitioning of dry mass and nitrogen in young tomato plants. , 2002, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[37]  T. Saarinen INTERNAL C:N BALANCE AND BIOMASS PARTITIONING OF CAREX ROSTRATA GROWN AT THREE LEVELS OF NITROGEN SUPPLY , 1998 .

[38]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Comparison of Two Shoot—Root Partitioning Models with Respect to Substrate Utilization and Functional Balance , 1987 .

[39]  Andrew Paul Gutierrez,et al.  A demographic model of assimilation and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in grapevines , 1991 .