Self-report measures of distractibility as correlates of simulated driving performance.

The present study investigated the relationship between self-reported measures pertaining to attention difficulties and simulated driving performance while distracted. Thirty-six licensed drivers participated in a simulator driving task while engaged in a cell phone conversation. The participants completed questionnaires assessing their tendency toward boredom, cognitive failures, and behaviors associated with attention deficit and hyperactivity. Scores on these measures were significantly correlated with various driving outcomes (e.g., speed, lane maintenance, reaction time). Significant relationships were also found between one aspect of boredom proneness (i.e., inability to generate interest or concentrate) and self-reports of past driving behavior (moving violations). The current study may aid in the understanding of how individual differences in driver distractibility may contribute to unsafe driving behaviors and accident involvement. Additionally, such measures may assist in the identification of individuals at risk for committing driving errors due to being easily distracted. The benefits and limitations of conducting and interpreting simulation research are discussed.

[1]  J. Laird,et al.  The Experience of Boredom: The Role of the Self-Perception of Attention , 1989 .

[2]  Steven J. Kass,et al.  Watching the Clock: Boredom and Vigilance Performance , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task , 1999 .

[4]  Paula A. Desmond,et al.  Personality and multiple dimensions of task-induced fatigue: a study of simulated driving , 1998 .

[5]  Dc Washington.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. , 1994 .

[6]  Per-Arne Rimmö,et al.  ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN VIOLATIONS AND ERRORS: SENSATION SEEKING ASSOCIATIONS , 1999 .

[7]  S. Vodanovich,et al.  Cognitive correlates of boredom proneness: the role of private self-consciousness and absorption. , 1998, The Journal of psychology.

[8]  Ryan C. Martin,et al.  Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  G. Weiss,et al.  Hyperactives as young adults: various clinical outcomes. , 1981, Adolescent psychiatry.

[10]  Stephen J. Vodanovich,et al.  Can Accidents and Industrial Mishaps Be Predicted? Further Investigation into the Relationship Between Cognitive Failure and Reports of Accidents , 2003 .

[11]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Effects of Instruction Type and Boredom Proneness in Vigilance: Implications for Boredom and Workload , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Timo Juhani Lajunen,et al.  Personality and accident liability: Are extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism related to traffic and occupational fatalities? , 2001 .

[13]  H Alm,et al.  Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones--a simulator study. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  R. Barkley,et al.  Motor vehicle driving competencies and risks in teens and young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[15]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality correlates of convicted drivers , 1993 .

[16]  J. T. Reason,et al.  Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health , 1988 .

[17]  T. Rundmo,et al.  Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers , 2002 .

[18]  Dong-Chul Seo,et al.  The Impact of In-Vehicle Cell-Phone Use on Accidents or Near-Accidents Among College Students , 2004, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[19]  Jonathan P. Maxwell,et al.  Further validation of the propensity for angry driving scale in British drivers , 2005 .

[20]  Kristen E Beede,et al.  Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Teimour Allahyari,et al.  Cognitive Failures, Driving Errors and Driving Accidents , 2008, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[22]  Graham J Hole,et al.  The Psychology of Driving , 2006 .

[23]  Suzanne P McEvoy,et al.  The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[25]  A. V. Hofe,et al.  Sensitivity to everyday failures and cognitive inhibition: Are they related? , 1998 .

[26]  D. I. Smith,et al.  Relationship between some personality characteristics and driving record , 1981 .

[27]  Frank Drews,et al.  A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[28]  R. Barkley,et al.  Driving-related risks and outcomes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adolescents and young adults: a 3- to 5-year follow-up survey. , 1993, Pediatrics.

[29]  A R Perry,et al.  Further Evidence of Associations of Type a Personality Scores and Driving-Related Attitudes and Behaviors , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[30]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Type A behaviour pattern: The effect of competition on heart rate and performance on a driving game , 1991 .

[31]  D. Broadbent,et al.  The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. , 1982, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[32]  R. Farmer,et al.  Boredom proneness--the development and correlates of a new scale. , 1986, Journal of personality assessment.

[33]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Boredom in interpersonal encounters: Antecedents and social implications. , 1986 .

[34]  Everett V. Smith,et al.  Factor structure of the DSM-IV criteria for college students using the Adult Behavior Checklist. , 1998 .

[35]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[36]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure , 1987 .

[37]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[38]  John D. Watt,et al.  Toward the development and validation of a measure of sexual boredom , 1996 .

[39]  Cynthia D. Fisherl.  Boredom at Work: A Neglected Concept , 1993 .

[40]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[41]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[42]  Steven J Kass,et al.  A Confirmatory Approach to the Factor Structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a Two-Factor Short Form , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[43]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003 .

[44]  G E Larson,et al.  CAN ACCIDENTS BE PREDICTED. AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE. (REANNOUNCEMENT WITH NEW AVAILABILITY INFORMATION); JOURNAL ARTICLE FOR PERIOD ENDING 1991 , 1991 .

[45]  Matthew Witte,et al.  Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[46]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[47]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  The psychometric properties of the Boredom Proneness Scale: An examination of its validity. , 1997 .

[48]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire , 1997 .

[49]  D. Cox,et al.  Effect of stimulant medication on driving performance of young adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a preliminary double-blind placebo controlled trial. , 2000, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.