Evaluating the Performance of Ordinary Kriging in Mapping Soil Salinity

AbstractThe performance of ordinary kriging (OK) is impacted by different factors that characterize the data sets being interpolated. The following factors were investigated as part of this study to evaluate the performance of OK in mapping soil salinity: (1) sampling density (field scale, subbasin scale, and subbasin scale merged with field scale); (2) spatial point patterns (random, aggregated, and regular); (3) spatial and no spatial autocorrelations; (4) normal and skewed distributions; and (5) homogeneity and heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the OK model against each of the aforementioned factors. To achieve this objective, 36 different data sets were selected from data collected from 1999 to 2008 in a study area in the Lower Arkansas River Valley in Colorado. These data sets were selected to represent the different factors used to evaluate the performance of OK, in which each factor is represented by three different data sets. Assessments of the OK model r...

[1]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[2]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  USE OF SWAT TO COMPUTE GROUNDWATER TABLE DEPTH AND STREAMFLOW IN THE MUSCATATUCK RIVER WATERSHED , 2005 .

[3]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[4]  T. Gates,et al.  Monitoring and Modeling Flow and Salt Transport in a Salinity-Threatened Irrigated Valley , 2002 .

[5]  John Triantafilis,et al.  Five Geostatistical Models to Predict Soil Salinity from Electromagnetic Induction Data Across Irrigated Cotton , 2001 .

[6]  Wesley W. Wallender,et al.  Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management , 2011 .

[7]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Salinisation of Land and water Resources; Human causes , 1995 .

[8]  Drainage Division,et al.  Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models , 1993 .

[9]  E. C. Pielou The Use of Point-to-Plant Distances in the Study of the Pattern of Plant Populations , 1959 .

[10]  T. Gates,et al.  Regional Assessment of Soil Water Salinity across an Intensively Irrigated River Valley , 2012 .

[11]  R. Reich,et al.  Soil Salinity Sampling Strategy Using Spatial Modeling Techniques, Remote Sensing, and Field Data , 2008 .

[12]  Timothy K. Gates,et al.  Calibration of electromagnetic induction for regional assessment of soil water salinity in an irrigated valley , 2006 .

[13]  J. Phillips Measuring complexity of environmental gradients , 2004, Vegetatio.

[14]  L. García,et al.  Using Indicator Kriging Technique for Soil Salinity and Yield Management , 2011 .

[15]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[16]  G. Robertson Geostatistics in Ecology: Interpolating With Known Variance , 1987 .

[17]  Marvin E. Jensen,et al.  Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems , 1980 .

[18]  A. Shirmohammadi,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL’S HYDROLOGY COMPONENT IN THE PIEDMONT PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGION OF MARYLAND , 2004 .

[19]  D. Wichelns An economic model of waterlogging and salinization in arid regions , 1999 .

[20]  J. S. Samra,et al.  MODELING OF VARIATION IN A SODIUM‐CONTAMINATED SOIL AND ASSOCIATED TREE GROWTH , 1993 .

[21]  J. D. Rhoades,et al.  Soil salinity assessment :methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements , 1999 .

[22]  A. Utset,et al.  A geostatistical method for soil salinity sample site spacing , 1998 .

[23]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[24]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[25]  L. Pozdnyakova,et al.  Geostatistical Analyses of Soil Salinity in a Large Field , 1999, Precision Agriculture.

[26]  J. Arnold,et al.  HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT 1 , 2005 .

[27]  Luis A. Garcia,et al.  Detecting Soil Salinity in Alfalfa Fields using Spatial Modeling and Remote Sensing , 2008 .

[28]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture , 2003 .

[29]  L. García,et al.  Using Disjunctive Kriging as a Quantitative Approach to Manage Soil Salinity and Crop Yield , 2012 .

[30]  Bilal Cemek,et al.  Assessment of spatial variability in some soil properties as related to soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra plain in northern Turkey , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[31]  T. Gates,et al.  Toward optimal water management in Colorado's Lower Arkansas River Valley : monitoring and modeling to enhance agriculture and environment , 2007 .

[32]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[33]  L. Wilding,et al.  Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys , 1985 .

[34]  Ricardo A. Olea,et al.  Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary , 1991 .

[35]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models , 2007 .

[36]  Luis A. Garcia,et al.  Comparison of Ordinary Kriging, Regression Kriging, and Cokriging Techniques to Estimate Soil Salinity Using LANDSAT Images , 2010 .