Origin and orbital distribution of the trans‐Neptunian scattered disc

We revisit the scenario proposed by Duncan and Levison in the late 1990s on the origin of the trans-Neptunian scattered disc. According to this scenario, the current scattered disc population is the remnant of a much more massive population that formed at the beginning of the Solar system, presumably when Neptune grew in mass. In order to compute the expected orbital distribution of the scattered disc bodies in the framework of this model, we have integrated the evolution of several thousands of test particles over the age of the Solar system, and looked at the orbital distribution of those surviving after more than 2 x 10 9 yr from their first scattering event. In order to compare this model distribution with the observed distribution, we have modelled the observational biases by generalizing a method originally introduced recently by Trujillo and Brown. Once the biases are taken into account, the model distribution matches the observed distribution fairly well. The most significant discrepancy is that the observed perihelion distance distribution is somewhat skewed towards larger perihelion distances than our model predicts. This is possibly due to the effects of planet migration (which tends to raise perihelion distances as recently shown by Gomes), which is not taken into account in our simulations.

[1]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  The Long-Term Dynamical Behavior of Short-Period Comets , 1993 .

[2]  Chadwick A. Trujillo,et al.  Properties of the Trans-Neptunian Belt: Statistics from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Survey , 2001 .

[3]  R. Gomes,et al.  The origin of the Kuiper Belt high-inclination population , 2003 .

[4]  Resonance occupation in the Kuiper belt: Case examples of the 5:2 and Trojan resonances , 2003, astro-ph/0301458.

[5]  Renu Malhotra,et al.  The origin of Pluto's orbit: implications for the , 1994, astro-ph/9504036.

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[7]  M. Duncan,et al.  A disk of scattered icy objects and the origin of Jupiter-family comets. , 1997, Science.

[8]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  From the Kuiper Belt to Jupiter-Family Comets: The Spatial Distribution of Ecliptic Comets☆ , 1997 .

[9]  C. Trujillo,et al.  A new dynamical class of object in the outer Solar System , 1997, Nature.

[10]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  Planetary migration in a planetesimal disk: why did Neptune stop at 30 AU? , 2004 .

[11]  Renu Malhotra,et al.  The origin of Pluto's peculiar orbit , 1995, Nature.

[12]  T. Grav,et al.  Evidence for an Extended Scattered Disk , 2001 .

[13]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  The formation of the Kuiper belt by the outward transport of bodies during Neptune's migration , 2003, Nature.

[14]  M. Bailey,et al.  A new class of trans-Neptunian objects in high-eccentricity orbits , 2003 .

[15]  Alessandro Morbidelli,et al.  The Kuiper Belt and its Primordial Sculpting , 2003 .

[16]  J. Petit,et al.  Large Scattered Planetesimals and the Excitation of the Small Body Belts , 1999 .

[17]  Chadwick A. Trujillo,et al.  The Radial Distribution of the Kuiper Belt , 2001 .

[18]  Michael E. Brown The Inclination Distribution of the Kuiper Belt , 2001 .