Formal notations are diagrams: Evidence from a production task

Although a general sense of the magnitude, quantity, or numerosity of objects is common in both untrained people and animals, the abilities to deal exactly with large quantities and to reason precisely in complex but well-specified situations—to behave formally, that is—are skills unique to people trained in symbolic notations. These symbolic notations typically employ complex, hierarchically embedded structures, which all extant analyses assume are constructed by concatenative, rule-based processes. The primary goal of this article is to establish, using behavioral measures on naturalistic tasks, that some of the same cognitive resources involved in representing spatial relations and proximities are also involved in representing symbolic notations—in short, that formal notations are a kind of diagram. We examined self-generated productions in the domains of handwritten arithmetic expressions and typewritten statements in a formal logic. In both tasks, we found substantial evidence for spatial representational schemes even in these highly symbolic domains.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Allen Newell,et al.  GPS, a program that simulates human thought , 1995 .

[3]  E. Feigenbaum,et al.  Computers and Thought , 1963 .

[4]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Assessing Knowledge Through Gesture: Using Children's Hands to Read Their Minds , 1992 .

[5]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Metaphor in the Mind and Hands , 2005 .

[6]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  The surface form×problem size interaction in cognitive arithmetic: evidence against an encoding locus , 1999, Cognition.

[7]  Despina A. Stylianou,et al.  On the interaction of visualization and analysis: the negotiation of a visual representation in expert problem solving , 2002 .

[8]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.

[9]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Do we think about time in terms of space , 2003 .

[10]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  A temporal signal reveals chunk structure in the writing of word phrases , 2006 .

[11]  Webb Phillips,et al.  Do we think about music in terms of space? Metaphoric representation of musical pitch. , 2003 .

[12]  Rina Zazkis,et al.  STRATEGIES: A STUDY OF STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF THE GROUP D4 , 1996 .

[13]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[15]  M. Alibali,et al.  Gesture-Speech Mismatch and Mechanisms of Learning: What the Hands Reveal about a Child′s State of Mind , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[17]  T. L. H.,et al.  A History of Mathematical Notations , 1929, Nature.

[18]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[20]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial representations in number processing--evidence from a pointing task , 2003 .

[21]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. , 2005, Child development.

[22]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[23]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[24]  Kenneth E. Iverson,et al.  Notation as a tool of thought , 1980, APLQ.

[25]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories—An Embodied Modeling Approach , 2006 .

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[27]  Sonit Bafna,et al.  Space Syntax , 2003 .

[28]  Laura Perini,et al.  The Truth in Pictures* , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[29]  David Kirshner,et al.  Visual Salience of Algebraic Transformations , 2004 .

[30]  David H. Kirshner The Visual Syntax of Algebra. , 1989 .

[31]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[32]  E. Dubinsky,et al.  Coordinating Visual and Analytic Strategies: A Study of Students' Understanding of the Group D4 , 1996, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[33]  Stefan Conrad,et al.  A Logic Primer , 1998, Logics for Databases and Information Systems.

[34]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How abstract is symbolic thought? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[36]  K. Stenning Seeing Reason: Image and language in learning to think , 2002 .

[37]  Jacques Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1949 .

[38]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  You'll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic , 2004, Cogn. Sci..