Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration

O spaces that enable shared public interpersonal communications are of significant social, organizational, and economic importance. In this paper, a theoretical model and associated unobtrusive method are proposed for researching the relationship between online spaces and the behavior they host. The model focuses on the collective impact that individual information-overload coping strategies have on the dynamics of open, interactive public online group discourse. Empirical research was undertaken to assess the validity of both the method and the model, based on the analysis of over 2.65 million postings to 600 Usenet newsgroups over a 6-month period. Our findings support the assertion that individual strategies for coping with “information overload” have an observable impact on large-scale online group discourse. Evidence was found for the hypotheses that: (1) users are more likely to respond to simpler messages in overloaded mass interaction; (2) users are more likely to end active participation as the overloading of mass interaction increases; and (3) users are more likely to generate simpler responses as the overloading of mass interaction grows. The theoretical model outlined offers insight into aspects of computer-mediated communication tool usability, technology design, and provides a road map for future empirical research.

[1]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Hyperlink Analyses of the World Wide Web: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Geoffrey Z. Liu,et al.  Virtual Community Presence in Internet Relay Chatting , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Quentin Jones,et al.  Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[5]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Friends and neighbors on the Web , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[6]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team: an experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online communities: a longitudinal analysis of communication activities , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[8]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Marc A. Smith,et al.  Visualization components for persistent conversations , 2001, CHI.

[10]  Eytan Adar,et al.  Free Riding on Gnutella , 2000, First Monday.

[11]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  What do virtual "Tells" tell? Placing cybersociety research into a hierarchy of social explanation , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Lada A. Adamic The Small World Web , 1999, ECDL.

[13]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace , 1999, ECSCW.

[14]  Lynn Cherny Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World , 1999 .

[15]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Interactional coherence in CMC , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[16]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  The dynamics of mass interaction , 1998, CSCW '98.

[17]  G. Hutton Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[18]  David D. Lewis,et al.  Threading Electronic Mail - A Preliminary Study , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Talking to strangers: an evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration , 1996, CSCW '96.

[20]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Zephyr Help Instance: promoting ongoing activity in a CSCW system , 1996, CHI.

[21]  Andries van Dam,et al.  50 years after “As we may think”: the Brown/MIT Vannevar Bush symposium , 1996, INTR.

[22]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[23]  L. Sproull,et al.  Atheism, sex, and databases: the net as a social technology , 1995 .

[24]  R. LaRose,et al.  Electronic Bulletin Boards and “Public Goods” Explanations of Collaborative Mass Media , 1993 .

[25]  A. A. Felts Organizational Communication , 1992 .

[26]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[27]  Russell Spears,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .

[28]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[29]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload , 1985, CACM.

[30]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[31]  R. Kling,et al.  The social dynamics of technical innovation in the computing world , 1977 .

[32]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[33]  R. Shephard Regression to the Mean , 2003, Sports medicine.

[34]  Marc A. Smith Invisible Crowds in Cyberspace: Mapping the Social Structure of the Usenet , 1999 .

[35]  Patricia R. Webb Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community , 1996 .

[36]  Roland J. Fletcher The Limits of Settlement Growth: A Theoretical Outline , 1995 .

[37]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[38]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .

[39]  J. Forrester Urban Dynamics , 1969 .

[40]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Computer as a Communication Device , 1968 .

[41]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .