Investigation of the mechanical interaction of the trabecular core with an external shell using rapid prototype and finite element models.

The mechanical properties of vertebral bone have been widely studied with the ultimate goal of improving fracture risk prediction. However, the mechanical interaction between the cortical shell and the trabecular core is not well understood. The objective of this study was to investigate this interaction and to determine what effect it has on the ultimate strength of the whole bone. This objective was achieved by compression testing rapid prototype (RP) models of cylindrical trabecular bone cores, with and without an integral surrounding shell and incorporating increasing levels of artificially induced bone loss. Corresponding finite element (FE) models were generated and the load sharing of the shell and trabecular core was analysed under linear elastic loading conditions. The results of the physical RP model tests and corresponding FE analyses indicated that there was a reinforcing effect between the cortical shell and the trabecular core for all models tested and that the reinforcing effect became relatively more important to the ultimate strength of the whole bone as the bone volume fraction of the trabecular core decreased. It was found that two mechanisms contributed to the reinforcing effect: (i) load transfer from the highly stressed shell into the connecting outer trabeculae of the core for the shelled model. This did not occur for the un-shelled model where the load dropped off at the outer unsupported trabeculae; (ii) the stiffening effect on the shell due to the support provided by the connecting struts of the trabecular core, which serves to inhibit bending and buckling behaviour in the shell under compression loading. It was found that the stiffening on the shell was the more dominant contributor to the overall reinforcing effect between the shell and the trabecular core.

[1]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Architectural modifications and cellular response during disuse-related bone loss in calcaneus of the sheep. , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  X. Guo,et al.  Mechanical consequence of trabecular bone loss and its treatment: a three-dimensional model simulation. , 2002, Bone.

[3]  S J Ferguson,et al.  Regional variation in vertebral bone morphology and its contribution to vertebral fracture strength. , 2007, Bone.

[4]  K. Un,et al.  The effects of side-artifacts on the elastic modulus of trabecular bone. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  L. Gibson,et al.  Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure. , 1997, Bone.

[6]  S. Lohfeld,et al.  Biomodels of Bone: A Review , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  W C Hayes,et al.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  L. Gibson,et al.  Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  M Viceconti,et al.  Dependence of mechanical compressive strength on local variations in microarchitecture in cancellous bone of proximal human femur. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J S Thomsen,et al.  Age-related differences between thinning of horizontal and vertical trabeculae in human lumbar bone as assessed by a new computerized method. , 2002, Bone.

[12]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  R. Guldberg,et al.  Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  B. Snyder,et al.  The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone. , 2006, Bone.

[15]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Andresen,et al.  Contribution of the cortical shell of vertebrae to mechanical behaviour of the lumbar vertebrae with implications for predicting fracture risk. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  G. Niebur,et al.  Microdamage propagation in trabecular bone due to changes in loading mode. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures). , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[19]  J. Railhac,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of In Vivo Bone Mineral Measurements in Sheep Using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Relative roles of microdamage and microfracture in the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  R Huiskes,et al.  Indirect determination of trabecular bone effective tissue failure properties using micro-finite element simulations. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  H Weinans,et al.  Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. , 2002, Bone.

[23]  Ming Ding,et al.  Age‐related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Mechanisms of uniformity of yield strains for trabecular bone. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  Regional trabecular morphology assessed by micro-CT is correlated with failure of aged thoracic vertebrae under a posteroanterior load and may determine the site of fracture. , 2007, Bone.

[26]  W C Hayes,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  Michael A K Liebschner,et al.  Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[29]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Cortical and Trabecular Load Sharing in the Human Vertebral Body , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  G. Niebur,et al.  High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  John W. Halloran,et al.  Rapid prototyping of trabecluar bone for mechanical testing , 1997 .

[32]  S. Goldstein The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Human vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  P. McHugh,et al.  Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process , 2007 .

[35]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modelling of non-invasively assessed trabecular bone structures. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Predicting human vertebral bone strength by vertebral static histomorphometry. , 2002, Bone.

[37]  R. Phillips,et al.  Three Dimensional Stereolithography Models of Cancellous Bone Structures From μCT Data: Testing and Validation of Finite Element Results , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[38]  H Weinans,et al.  Osteoporosis Changes the Amount of Vertebral Trabecular Bone at Risk of Fracture but Not the Vertebral Load Distribution , 2001, Spine.

[39]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Establishment of an architecture-specific experimental validation approach for finite element modeling of bone by rapid prototyping and high resolution computed tomography. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[40]  Matthew R Allen,et al.  A computational assessment of the independent contribution of changes in canine trabecular bone volume fraction and microarchitecture to increased bone strength with suppression of bone turnover. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  D. Fyhrie,et al.  Finite element calculated uniaxial apparent stiffness is a consistent predictor of uniaxial apparent strength in human vertebral cancellous bone tested with different boundary conditions. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Heterogeneous linear elastic trabecular bone modelling using micro-CT attenuation data and experimentally measured heterogeneous tissue properties. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Analysis of mechanical properties of cancellous bone under conditions of simulated bone atrophy. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  R Huiskes,et al.  Trabecular architecture can remain intact for both disuse and overload enhanced resorption characteristics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  The ovariectomized sheep as a model for human bone loss. , 2004, Journal of comparative pathology.

[47]  M. Ito,et al.  Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to the mechanical properties of bone and their regulating parameters. , 2002, Bone.

[48]  D Vashishth,et al.  Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension. , 2000, Bone.

[49]  H. Weinans,et al.  A Three‐Dimensional Simulation of Age‐Related Remodeling in Trabecular Bone , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[50]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  H Follet,et al.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of trabecular calcaneus determined by finite-element models using 3D synchrotron microtomography. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength – effects of loading , 2000, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.

[53]  T. Umeno,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of trabecular bone using rapid prototyping technology , 2006 .

[54]  R. Müller,et al.  Testing two predictions for fracture load using computer models of trabecular bone. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Tony M. Keaveny,et al.  The micro-mechanics of cortical shell removal in the human vertebral body , 2007 .

[56]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Side-artifact errors in yield strength and elastic modulus for human trabecular bone and their dependence on bone volume fraction and anatomic site. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[57]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.