Direct Ink Writing of Cement Structures Modified with Nanoscale Additive

Synthetic structures built with cement benefit from high compressive strength, but their brittleness limits their fracture toughness under conditions where repeated, unnegotiable strains are imparted. This could be somewhat alleviated, if complex structures with tunable geometries is created, for example, via direct ink writing (DIW)‐based 3D printing. However, the nature of the slurries used in the DIW printing of cement must be modified with proper rheology to be effectively and programmatically printed with distinct mechanical properties intended for specific applications. Here, the authors have developed a nano‐clay modified cement‐based direct ink that enables high‐resolution 3D printing of complex architected structures of tunable geometries. The developed ink has a significant shear thinning and rapid gel strength properties which facilitate extrusion from a micro‐nozzle (≈400 μm) under ambient conditions conserving the filamentary shape with holding the load of the subsequent printed layer above. A series of architected structures have revealed how nanoscale additive, fabrication process, and architecture of the structures can influence both the stiffness and toughness in the cementitious materials. Understanding these construction principles based on architectures, materials, and processing can change the brittle cement‐based structure to a tough one for structural and functional applications.

[1]  J. Schroers,et al.  3D printing metals like thermoplastics: Fused filament fabrication of metallic glasses , 2018, Materials Today.

[2]  André R. Studart,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical liquid-crystal-polymer structures , 2018, Nature.

[3]  Jan Olek,et al.  Additive Manufacturing and Performance of Architectured Cement‐Based Materials , 2018, Advanced materials.

[4]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Time gap effect on bond strength of 3D-printed concrete , 2018, Virtual and Physical Prototyping.

[5]  Jun Lou,et al.  Multiscale Geometric Design Principles Applied to 3D Printed Schwarzites , 2018, Advanced materials.

[6]  Lang Xia,et al.  4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration. , 2017, Materials today.

[7]  Zhipei Sun,et al.  Black phosphorus ink formulation for inkjet printing of optoelectronics and photonics , 2017, Nature Communications.

[8]  Kah Fai Leong,et al.  3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review , 2017 .

[9]  J. Lewis,et al.  Architected cellular ceramics with tailored stiffness via direct foam writing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Xin Wang,et al.  3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective , 2017 .

[11]  Freek Bos,et al.  Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing , 2016, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction.

[12]  Zongjin Li,et al.  A review on the mechanical properties of cement-based materials measured by nanoindentation , 2015 .

[13]  J. Lewis,et al.  Device fabrication: Three-dimensional printed electronics , 2015, Nature.

[14]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Bioinspired structural materials. , 2014, Nature Materials.

[15]  R. Ritchie,et al.  A methodology for the investigation of toughness and crack propagation in mouse bone. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[16]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D‐Printing of Lightweight Cellular Composites , 2014, Advanced materials.

[17]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  R. Markwald,et al.  Scaffold‐free inkjet printing of three‐dimensional zigzag cellular tubes , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  Nathan Tregger,et al.  Influence of clays on the rheology of cement pastes , 2010 .

[20]  Malcolm N. Cooke,et al.  Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.