Design characteristics of a workload manager to aid drivers in safety–critical situations

The objective of this study was to evaluate a workload manager designed to supervise the presentation of in-vehicle information for two age groups of drivers during safety–critical situations. The benefits of a workload manager were compared in various dual-task conditions involving a preceding or a concurrent in-vehicle alert during critical traffic situations. Objective measures such as drivers’ brake response times and secondary task response times as well as subjective measures of driver workload were used. Although older drivers performed worse in the dual-task scenario with longer response times and poorer performance on the secondary task in comparison to the younger drivers, results indicated that both age groups benefited from the implementation of a workload manager. There was a consistent trend of improved driving and secondary task performance when the workload manager delayed non-critical information during safety–critical situations, indicating benefits for some otherwise distracted drivers. Implications for the design of a workload manager are discussed.

[1]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Task switching and multitask performance. , 2000 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[3]  David Shinar,et al.  To call or not to call--that is the question (while driving). , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Mathew P White,et al.  Risk Perceptions of Mobile Phone Use While Driving , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Paul Milgram,et al.  The Development of a Time-Related Measure to Describe Driving Strategy , 1984 .

[6]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Prevention of Rear-End Crashes in Drivers with Task-Induced Fatigue through the Use of Auditory Collision Avoidance Warnings , 2006 .

[7]  Johan Engström,et al.  Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty , 2005 .

[8]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Effects of Memory Rehearsal on Driver Performance: Experiment and Theoretical Account , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Liisa Hakamies-Blomqvist,et al.  OLDER DRIVERS' ABERRANT DRIVING BEHAVIOUR, IMPAIRED ACTIVITY, AND HEALTH AS REASONS FOR SELF-IMPOSED DRIVING LIMITATIONS , 2002 .

[10]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Development of an Adaptive Workload Management System Using the Queueing Network-Model Human Processor (QN-MHP) , 2008, IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print).

[11]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Human Factors Field Evaluation of Automotive Headway Maintenance/Collision Warning Devices , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Ingo Totzke,et al.  Secondary tasks while driving effects and countermeasures , 2005 .

[13]  Jeff Allen Greenberg,et al.  Simulator Study of Effects of Alternative Distraction Mitigation Strategies in Driver Workload Manager , 2011 .

[14]  Carol Holland,et al.  The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Toshihiro Wakita,et al.  Voice Information System that Adapts to Driver ' s Mental Workload , 2004 .

[16]  Inmaculada Fierro,et al.  Older drivers, medical condition, medical impairment and crash risk. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  H. Buchtel,et al.  Spatial attentional shifts: Further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Alan D. Baddeley.  Selective attention and performance in dangerous environments. , 1972 .

[19]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  Who Reaps the Benefits, Who Bears the Risks? Comparative Optimism, Comparative Utility, and Regulatory Preferences for Mobile Phone Technology , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas M. Spalek,et al.  Driving With the Wandering Mind , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Paul Atchley,et al.  The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: behavior may shape attitude. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Håkan Jansson,et al.  An analysis of driver’s steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system , 2003 .

[24]  Suzanne P McEvoy,et al.  The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Driving impairs talking , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Ying Wang,et al.  Does cognitive distraction improve or degrade lane keeping performance? Analysis of time-to-line crossing safety margins , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[27]  T H Rockwell,et al.  Spare Visual Capacity in Driving-Revisited: New Empirical Results for an Old Idea , 1988 .

[28]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Samantha Jamson,et al.  Temporal fluctuations in driving demand: the effect of traffic complexity on subjective measures of workload and driving performance , 2014 .

[30]  O. Carsten,et al.  Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[32]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  Impact of Cognitive Task Complexity on Drivers’ Visual Tunneling , 2009 .

[33]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[34]  W B Verwey,et al.  On-line driver workload estimation. Effects of road situation and age on secondary task measures , 2000, Ergonomics.

[35]  Ps Hu.  SUMMARY OF TRAVEL TRENDS: 2001 NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY , 2004 .

[36]  Janine G. Walker,et al.  Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. , 2005, Clinical psychology review.

[37]  David J. Wheatley,et al.  Driver Choice of Headway with Auditory Warnings , 2001 .

[38]  Susan G. Hill,et al.  Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary? In A , 1989 .

[39]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[40]  Myra Blanco,et al.  The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[41]  Erik Nelson,et al.  The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  Christoph Mayser,et al.  REDUCING DRIVERS' MENTAL WORKLOAD BY MEANS OF AN ADAPTIVE MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE , 2003 .

[43]  Samantha Jamson,et al.  Mind the gap: Drivers underestimate the impact of the behaviour of other traffic on their workload. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[44]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[45]  Matthew J. Jensen,et al.  A Customizable Human/Vehicle Interface for Enhanced Operator Performance , 2007 .

[46]  Jing Feng,et al.  Simulated Driving Environment Impacts Mind Wandering , 2015 .

[47]  Oliver M. J. Carsten,et al.  Introduction to the special section: Can workload take the strain? , 2014, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[48]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[49]  F.R.H. Zijlstra,et al.  Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools , 1993 .

[50]  John D Lee,et al.  Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: The effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance , 2004, Ergonomics.