Predicting First-Grade Reading Performance from Kindergarten Response to Tier 1 Instruction

Many schools are implementing multitier response-to-intervention (RTI) models to reduce reading difficulties. This study was part of our larger ongoing longitudinal RTI investigation within the Florida Learning Disabilities Center grant and was conducted in 7 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse schools. We observed reading instruction in 20 classrooms, examined response rates to kindergarten Tier 1 instruction, and predicted students' first-grade reading performance based on kindergarten growth and end-of-year reading performance (n = 203). Teachers followed an explicit core reading program. Overall, classroom instruction was rated as effective. Results indicate that controlling for students' end-of-kindergarten reading, their growth across kindergarten on a variety of language and literacy measures suppressed predictions of first-grade performance. Specifically, the steeper the students' trajectory to a satisfactory outcome, the less likely they were to demonstrate good performance in first grade. Implications for future research and RTI implementation are discussed.

[1]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Selecting At-Risk Readers in First Grade for Early Intervention: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Decision Rules and Procedures , 2006 .

[2]  A. G. Bishop,et al.  Identifying a Multivariate Screening Model to Predict Reading Difficulties at the Onset of Kindergarten: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[4]  Kristen D. Ritchey,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Oral Reading Fluency in Young Children At Risk for Reading Failure , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention , 2002 .

[6]  Jorge E. Gonzalez,et al.  Learner Characteristics that Influence the Treatment Effectiveness of Early Literacy Interventions: A Meta–Analytic Review , 2003 .

[7]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers , 2005 .

[8]  Dc Washington,et al.  Executive summary: Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. , 2008 .

[9]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[10]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[11]  Alicia Sandman,et al.  Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills , 2010 .

[12]  T. Conway,et al.  Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. , 1999 .

[13]  C. Schatschneider,et al.  Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties , 2008 .

[14]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Identifying Reading Disabilities by Responsiveness-to-Instruction: Specifying Measures and Criteria , 2004 .

[15]  J. E. Fischel,et al.  Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: the effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[16]  Carrie Thomas Beck,et al.  Reading Fluency as a Predictor of Reading Proficiency in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools , 2008 .

[17]  Kristen L. McMaster,et al.  Monitoring the Academic Progress of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Generally Effective Early Reading Intervention , 2002 .

[18]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Beginning Reading Intervention as Inoculation or Insulin , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[19]  C. Schatschneider,et al.  The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption. , 2008, Learning and individual differences.

[20]  D. Fuchs,et al.  What We Need to Know about Responsiveness to Intervention (and Shouldn't be Afraid to Ask) , 2007 .

[21]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[22]  Marcia L. Kosanovich,et al.  Reading First kindergarten classroom instruction and students' growth in phonological awareness and letter naming-decoding fluency. , 2008, Journal of school psychology.

[23]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Kindergarten Reading Interventions for At-Risk Students: Twenty Year s of Research , 2004 .

[24]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing , 1997 .

[25]  F. Vellutino,et al.  Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing Between Children With and Without Reading Disabilities , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing Change , 1987 .

[27]  Judith D. Singer,et al.  Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models , 1998 .

[28]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Individualizing student instruction precisely: effects of Child x Instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development. , 2009, Child development.

[29]  Ruth A. Kaminski,et al.  Assessing early literacy skills in a Problem-Solving model: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills. , 1998 .