Unsteady Flow Simulations of an Over-the-wing Propeller Configuration

The aerodynamic integration effects of an embedded over-the-wing propeller at take-off conditions are discussed based on steady and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow simulations. In contrast to the rotating blade and hub geometry, the steady computations utilized an actuator disk model with blade element theory enhancement to investigate the mutual influnce between installed propeller and wing with sufficient accuracy. A simplified high-lift geometry of this channel wing concept is compared to a conventional tractor configuration. While the general overthe-wing integration effects, such as lift-to-drag ratio improvement and deteriorated propeller efficiency, are already captured by inexpensive steady simulations, only unsteady computations with full propeller geometry reveal some important flow details. The most striking unsteady effect is the interaction of the blade tip vortex with the boundary layer of the wing which only occurs at the channel wing due to the close coupling. As a consequence the low momentum fluid detaches above the flap leading to a comparatively low lift coefficient.

[1]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Propeller^Wing Integration for Minimum Induced Loss , 1986 .

[2]  R. Radespiel,et al.  Aerodynamic performance of an over-the-wing propeller configuration at increasing Mach number , 2014 .

[3]  Rolf Radespiel,et al.  Installation Effects of a Propeller Over a Wing with Internally Blown Flap , 2012 .

[4]  Small RNAs: Delivering the future , 2007, Nature.

[5]  P. Spalart,et al.  Turbulence Modeling in Rotating and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction , 2000 .

[6]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Large scale separation flow control experiments within the German Flow Control Network , 2009 .

[7]  John S. Sullivan,et al.  Aerodynamic interaction between propellers and wings , 1989 .

[8]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[9]  Rolf Radespiel,et al.  Aerodynamic Installation Effects of an Over-the-Wing Propeller on a High-Lift Configuration , 2014 .

[10]  Carsten Lenfers,et al.  Propeller Design for a future QESTOL Aircraft in the BNF Project , 2012 .

[11]  Robert J. Englar,et al.  PNEUMATIC CHANNEL WING POWERED-LIFT ADVANCED SUPER- STOL AIRCRAFT , 2002 .

[12]  Axel Raichle,et al.  A New Actuator Disk Model for the TAU Code and Application to a Sailplaine with a Folding Engine , 2007 .

[13]  E. R. White,et al.  Exploratory low-speed wind-tunnel investigation of advanced commuter configurations including an over-the-wing propeller design , 1983 .

[14]  Peter Horst,et al.  Multidisciplinary Integrated Preliminary Design Applied to Unconventional Aircraft Configurations , 2008 .

[15]  R. Radespiel,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE PROPELLER POSITION ON THE AERODYNAMICS OF A CHANNEL WING , 2013 .