Mechanical and numerical behavior of groups of screw (type) piles founded in a tropical soil of the Midwestern Brazil

Abstract This paper presents and discusses the behavior of standard groups and piled rafts constructed with helical screw piles founded in the typical soil of the Federal District of Brazil (DF). The paper initially characterizes the soil deposit of a new Experimental Site in the DF via laboratory (standard characterization, triaxial) and field (standard penetration and flat dilatometer) tests. It then moves to explain a recently adjusted (hypoplasticity) constitutive model that takes on consideration the inherent soils structure to simulate the behavior of this typical geotechnical material. The model was calibrated via point load test analyses and incorporated into a finite element methodology (FEM) routine internal to the traditional Abaqus software. Real scale field load tests on standard pile groups and piled rafts executed with this pile type were carried out in the new site. FEM analyses were used to calibrate the model and to expand the knowledge on the shearing mechanisms, generated stresses, displacement fields, load sharing, group efficiency, and on the contribution of the supporting raft to the overall systems performance. Conclusions of practical and academic interest are given for this new type of foundation employed in the region.

[1]  A. Schofield,et al.  Yielding of Clays in States Wetter than Critical , 1963 .

[2]  Chandrakant S. Desai,et al.  Constitutive laws for engineering materials, with emphasis on geologic materials , 1984 .

[3]  R. Whitlow,et al.  Basic Soil Mechanics , 1983 .

[4]  R. Nova,et al.  ELASTOPLASTIC MODEL FOR CEMENTED SOILS , 2001 .

[5]  Silvano Marchetti,et al.  In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer , 1980 .

[6]  P. R. Vaughan,et al.  The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks , 1990 .

[7]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  The standard penetration test (SPT): methods and use , 1995 .

[8]  A hypoplastic constitutive model for cohesive powders , 1995 .

[9]  T Lunne,et al.  CALIBRATION OF DILATOMETER CORRELATIONS , 1989 .

[10]  N. Kalteziotis,et al.  Geotechnical properties of the Corinth Canal marls , 1991 .

[11]  Federica Cotecchia,et al.  A general framework for the mechanical behaviour of clays , 2000 .

[12]  P. V. Wolffersdorff,et al.  A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface , 1996 .

[13]  Giacomo Russo,et al.  Pile foundations: Experimental investigations, analysis and design , 2005 .

[14]  George Philip Manning,et al.  Design and construction of foundations , 1972 .

[15]  Matthew Richard Coop,et al.  On the mechanics of structured sands , 1999 .

[16]  R. Nova,et al.  An experimental and theoretical study of the behaviour of a calcarenite in triaxial compression , 1995 .

[17]  Béatrice A. Baudet,et al.  A CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR STRUCTURED CLAYS , 2004 .

[18]  J. Carter,et al.  A structured Cam Clay model , 2002 .

[19]  Wuming Yan,et al.  A model for natural soil with bonds , 2011 .

[20]  J. Burland.  On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays , 1990 .

[21]  David Mašín,et al.  Hypoplastic models for fine-grained soils , 2007 .

[22]  K. Johnson,et al.  Modelling the load-deformation response of deep foundations under oblique loading , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  M Bustamante,et al.  THE BEARING CAPACITY OF A PILE , 1980 .

[24]  Alec Westley Skempton,et al.  The bearing capacity of clays , 1951 .