Top management support of R&D projects: a strategic leadership perspective

A study of top management support of 213 R&D projects in 21 major firms revealed significant relationships between independent informants' perceptions of top management support, project characteristics, and project performance. Testing a model based on a strategic leadership perspective, top management support was found to be directed at certain types of projects, i.e., those that were expected to make greater contributions to business goals, represented larger investments, were seeking new products and process versus incremental improvements, and had originated from business sources as opposed to R&D. In addition, even after controlling for these project characteristics, projects with top management support were less likely to be terminated. In contrast, after controlling for project characteristics, completed projects with top management support were not judged to make greater contributions to the firm's business goals suggesting top management may not be able to pick winners. Findings are discussed in terms of future research and implications for top management leadership within R&D. >

[1]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[2]  Stephen K. Markham,et al.  Champions and antagonists: Relationships with r&d project characteristics and management , 1991 .

[3]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[4]  D. Hambrick.  Putting top managers back in the strategy picture , 1989 .

[5]  Warren B. Brown,et al.  A systems model of technological innovation , 1989 .

[6]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Cybernetics and Dependence: Reframing the Control Concept , 1988 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[8]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[10]  R. MacCallum,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS , 1986 .

[11]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  MANAGING HUMAN PROBLEMS IN STRATEGIC PLANNING SYSTEMS , 1986 .

[12]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  How Management Can Influence the Generation of Ideas , 1985 .

[13]  M. Moser.  Measuring Performance in R&D Settings , 1985 .

[14]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  Top management roles in R&D projects , 1984 .

[16]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[17]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[18]  Thomas A. DeCotiis,et al.  Defining and Measuring Project Performance , 1979 .

[19]  Thomas A. DeCotiis,et al.  The dimensions and determinants of project performance , 1977 .

[20]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments , 1975 .

[21]  Neil R. Baker,et al.  R&D Project Selection Models: An Assessment , 1974, R&D Management.

[22]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .