Deep learning-based body weight from scout images can be an alternative to actual body weight in CT radiation dose management.

PURPOSE Accurate body weight measurement is essential to promote computed tomography (CT) dose optimization; however, body weight cannot always be measured prior to CT examination, especially in the emergency setting. The aim of this study was to investigate whether deep learning-based body weight from chest CT scout images can be an alternative to actual body weight in CT radiation dose management. METHODS Chest CT scout images and diagnostic images acquired for medical checkups were collected from 3601 patients. A deep learning model was developed to predict body weight from scout images. The correlation between actual and predicted body weight was analyzed. To validate the use of predicted body weight in radiation dose management, the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol ) and the dose-length product (DLP) were compared between the body weight subgroups based on actual and predicted body weight. Surrogate size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) acquired from actual and predicted body weight were compared to the reference standard. RESULTS The median actual and predicted body weight were 64.1 (interquartile range: 56.5-72.4) and 64.0 (56.3-72.2) kg, respectively. There was a strong correlation between actual and predicted body weight (ρ = 0.892, p < 0.001). The CTDIvol and DLP of the body weight subgroups were similar based on actual and predicted body weight (p < 0.001). Both surrogate SSDEs based on actual and predicted body weight were not significantly different from the reference standard (p = 0.447 and 0.410, respectively). CONCLUSION Predicted body weight can be an alternative to actual body weight in managing dose metrics and simplifying SSDE calculation. Our proposed method can be useful for CT radiation dose management in adult patients with unknown body weight.

[1]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Deep Learning-based calculation of patient size and attenuation surrogates from localizer Image: Toward personalized chest CT protocol optimization. , 2022, European journal of radiology.

[2]  M. Rehani,et al.  T-shirt size as a classification for body habitus in computed tomography (CT) and development of size-based dose reference levels for different indications. , 2022, European journal of radiology.

[3]  W. Sensakovic,et al.  U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Pediatric CT Examinations. , 2021, Radiology.

[4]  H. Sugimori,et al.  A deep-learning method using computed tomography scout images for estimating patient body weight , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Simplified size adjusted dose reference levels for adult CT examinations: A regional study. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[6]  T. Miyati,et al.  CT dose management of adult patients with unknown body weight using an effective diameter. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[7]  M. Sanagou,et al.  Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT , 2020, Journal of medical radiation sciences.

[8]  S. Kritsaneepaiboon,et al.  Can Patient’s Body Weight Represent Body Diameter for Pediatric Size-Specific Dose Estimate in Thoracic and Abdominal Computed Tomography? , 2019, Journal of clinical imaging science.

[9]  M. Maher,et al.  Using body mass index to estimate individualised patient radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography , 2018, European Radiology Experimental.

[10]  D. Gascho,et al.  A new method for estimating patient body weight using CT dose modulation data , 2017, European Radiology Experimental.

[11]  C J Martin,et al.  ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging , 2017, Annals of the ICRP.

[12]  R. Morin,et al.  U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. , 2017, Radiology.

[13]  G. Bibbo,et al.  Diagnostic reference levels of paediatric computed tomography examinations performed at a dedicated Australian paediatric hospital , 2016, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[14]  R. Lanzman,et al.  Does body mass index outperform body weight as a surrogate parameter in the calculation of size-specific dose estimates in adult body CT? , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  Rochester,et al.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. , 2014, AAPM report.

[16]  Allen J. Taylor,et al.  Scout view X-ray attenuation versus weight-based selection of reduced peak tube voltage in cardiac CT angiography. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[17]  J. Boone,et al.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. , 2011, Radiology.

[18]  John M Boone,et al.  Determination of height, weight, body mass index, and body surface area with a single abdominal CT image. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  Y. Tsushima,et al.  SIMPLE METHOD OF SIZE-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES CALCULATION FROM PATIENT WEIGHT ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 2018, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[20]  M. Kalra,et al.  Simplifying size-specific radiation dose estimates in pediatric CT. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.