Using Toulmin Argumentation to develop an Online Dispute Resolution Environment

Our goal is to model reasoning in discretionary legal domains. To do so, we use Knowledge Discovery from Database Techniques. However there are obstacles to this approach, including difficulties in generating explanations once conclusions have been inferred, difficulties associated with the collection of sufficient data from past cases and difficulties associated with integrating two vastly different paradigms. Toulmin’s treatise on the uses of argument can be gainfully employed to construct legal decision support systems in discretionary domains. We show how we can use Toulmin’s approach to build such systems with examples taken from the domains of eligibility for legal aid, evaluation of eyewitness evidence, family law, refugee law and sentencing. We then show how Toulmin Argument Structures can be developed to construct an Online Dispute Resolution environment that allows for determining BATNAs, exchanging opinions and providing advice about tradeoffs.

[1]  A. Marty.  Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 1983 .

[2]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Argument-based explanation of logic programs , 1991, Knowl. Based Syst..

[3]  H. Laurence Ross,et al.  Settled Out of Court , 1980 .

[4]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[5]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  The Split-up Project: Induction, Context and Knowledge Discovery in Law , 2004 .

[6]  Imran A. Zualkernan,et al.  Types of Expertise: An Invariant of Problem Solving , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[8]  Karl Branting,et al.  A computational model of ratio decidendi , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[9]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[10]  ZeleznikowJohn,et al.  A hybrid rule --- neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia , 1999 .

[11]  J. Kemp,et al.  The Concept of Law. , 1962 .

[12]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[13]  J. Nash.  Two-Person Cooperative Games , 1953 .

[14]  C. C. Marshall,et al.  Representing the structure of a legal argument , 1989, ICAIL '89.

[15]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[16]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Copyright Regulation with Argumentation Agents , 2001 .

[17]  Alan R. White,et al.  Taking Rights Seriously. , 1977 .

[18]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Building Decision Support Systems in Discretionary Legal Domains , 2000 .

[19]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Family_Winner: Integrating Game Theory and Heuristics to Provide Negotiation Support , 2003 .

[20]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Supporting discretionary decision-making with information technology: a case study in the criminal sentencing jurisdiction , 2005 .

[21]  A. Lodder.  DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation , 1999 .

[22]  Judith P. Dick,et al.  Conceptual retrieval and case law , 1987, ICAIL '87.

[23]  Gerald R. Williams.  Legal negotiation and settlement , 1983 .

[24]  John Zeleznikow,et al.  Trade-Off Manipulations in the Development of Negotiation Decision Support Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Maria Jean Johnstone Hall,et al.  The Development and Rapid Evolution of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony , 2002 .

[26]  George C. Christie.  An Essay on Discretion , 1986 .

[27]  John Kingston,et al.  Prototyping a Legal Decision Support System: A Case Study , 2002 .

[28]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  A Strategy for Evaluating Web-Based Discretionary Decision Support Systems , 2002, ADBIS Research Communications.

[29]  William J. Ball,et al.  Using Virgil to Analyze Public Policy Arguments: A System Based on Toulmin's Informal Logic , 1994 .

[30]  Peter Clark,et al.  A model of argumentation and its application in a cooperative expert system , 1991 .

[31]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  WebShell: The development of web based expert systems , 2002 .

[32]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[33]  Luuk Matthijssen,et al.  Interfacing Between Lawyers and Computers: An Architecture for Knowledge-based Interfaces to Legal Databases , 1999 .