The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry

[1]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[2]  B. Laeng,et al.  The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness , 2017, i-Perception.

[3]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Pupillary Responses to Words That Convey a Sense of Brightness or Darkness , 2017, Psychological science.

[4]  F. Dehais,et al.  The impact of luminance on tonic and phasic pupillary responses to sustained cognitive load. , 2017, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  A Model Relating Pupil Diameter to Mental Workload and Lighting Conditions , 2016, CHI.

[6]  Michael W. Weiss,et al.  Pupils dilate for vocal or familiar music. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Christoph W Korn,et al.  A solid frame for the window on cognition: Modeling event-related pupil responses. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[8]  Albert Costa,et al.  Lying in a native and foreign language , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[9]  Douglas P Munoz,et al.  A circuit for pupil orienting responses: implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Mickaël Causse,et al.  Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Daniel Howes,et al.  The Use of Task-Evoked Pupillary Response as an Objective Measure of Cognitive Load in Novices and Trained Physicians: A New Tool for the Assessment of Expertise , 2015, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[13]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  D. Brainard,et al.  Opponent melanopsin and S-cone signals in the human pupillary light response , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[17]  B. Laeng,et al.  The Eye Pupil Adjusts to Imaginary Light , 2014, Psychological science.

[18]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[19]  Paola Binda,et al.  Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Bradley,et al.  Orienting and Emotional Perception: Facilitation, Attenuation, and Interference , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[21]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures , 2011 .

[22]  Fang Chen,et al.  Pupillary Response Based Cognitive Workload Measurement under Luminance Changes , 2011, INTERACT.

[23]  Oleg V. Komogortsev,et al.  Body mass index moderates gaze orienting biases and pupil diameter to high and low calorie food images , 2011, Appetite.

[24]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Pupillary Stroop effects , 2010, Cognitive Processing.

[26]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[27]  N. Hayashi,et al.  Effect of intensity of dynamic exercise on pupil diameter in humans. , 2010, Journal of physiological anthropology.

[28]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[30]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[31]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[32]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Categories & Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information , 2022 .

[34]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  Canan Karatekin,et al.  Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Michael Wilson.  MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[37]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[38]  H. J. Wyatt.  The form of the human pupil , 1995, Vision Research.

[39]  H. Stanley Thompson,et al.  The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications, Vols. I and II , 1993 .

[40]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  The Pupillary Response in Cognitive Psychophysiology and Schizophrenia a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  B. Moore.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  J. Bradshaw.  Background light intensity and the pupillary response in a reaction time task , 1969 .

[44]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[45]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[46]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[47]  J. Wilder,et al.  Modern psychophysiology and the law of initial value. , 1958, American journal of psychotherapy.

[48]  J. Lacey,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSES: TOWARD A GENERAL SOLUTION , 1956, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Megan H. Papesh,et al.  Pupillometry and Memory: External Signals of Metacognitive Control , 2015 .

[50]  D. Lakens.  Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses , 2015 .

[51]  J. Kruschke.  Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison. , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[52]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[53]  W W Tryon,et al.  Pupillometry: a survey of sources of variation. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[54]  M. P. Janisse.  Pupillometry: Some Advances, Problems and Solutions , 1974 .

[55]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .