Weighted Interaction of Syntax and Semantics in Natural Language Analysis

The present paper discusses the extensions to the parsing strategies adopted for FIDO (a Flexible Interface for Database Operations). The parser is able to deal with ill-formed inputs (syntactically ill - formed sentences, fragments, conjunctions, etc.) because of the strict cooperation among syntax and semantics. The syntactic knowledge is represented by means of packets of condition-action rules associated with syntactic categories. The non-determinism is mainly handled by means of rules which restructure the parse tree (called "natural changes") so that the use of backtracking is strongly limited. In order to deal with difficult cases in which no clear-cut mechanism exists for excluding an interpretation, a weighting mechanism has been added to the parser so that it is possible to explore few different hypotheses in parallel and to choose the best one on the basis of complex interaction among syntax and semantics.

[1]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Parsability , 1984, ACL.

[2]  Eugene Charniak Six Topics in Search of a Parser: An Overview of AI Language Research , 1981, IJCAI.

[3]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Conceptual Analysis of Garden-Path Sentences , 1984, ACL.

[4]  Koichiro Ishihara,et al.  A proper treatment of syntax and semantics in machine translation , 1984 .

[5]  William A. Woods,et al.  Cascaded ATN Grammars , 1980, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[6]  Lenhart K. Schubert On Parsing Preferences , 1984, COLING.

[7]  Pietro Torasso,et al.  Semantic and pragmatic processing in FIDO: A flexible interface for data-base operations , 1985, Inf. Syst..

[8]  Pietro Torasso,et al.  A Deterministic Analyzer for the Interpretation of Natural Language Commands , 1981, IJCAI.

[9]  Norman K. Sondheimer,et al.  Relaxation Techniques for Parsing Grammatically III-Formed Input in Natural Language Understanding Systems , 1981, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[10]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Language as a cognitive process 1: Syntax , 1982 .

[11]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[12]  Pietro Torasso,et al.  Analysis of Conjunctions in a Rule-Based Parser , 1985, ACL.

[13]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  A Preferential, Pattern-Seeking, Semantics for Natural Language Inference , 1975, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Language as a Cognitive Process , 1983, CL.

[15]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A Theory of Approximate Reasoning , 1979 .

[16]  Koichiro Ishihara,et al.  A Proper Treatmemt Of Syntax And Semantics In Machine Translation , 1984, COLING.

[17]  Pietro Torasso,et al.  Evidence Combination in Expert Systems , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[18]  Pietro Torasso,et al.  Interpreting Syntactically Ill-Formed Sentences , 1984, ACL.

[19]  Robert William Milne,et al.  Predicting Garden Path Sentences , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  C. Raymond Perrault On the Mathematical Properties of Linguistic Theories , 1983, ACL.

[21]  Michael B. Kac Review of M. Marcus, A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language , 1982 .

[22]  Pietro Torasso,et al.  A Flexible Natural Language Parser Based on a Two-Level Representation of Syntax , 1983, EACL.

[23]  Tetsuya Ishikawa,et al.  Lexicon Features for Japanese Syntactic Analysis in Mu-Project-JE , 1984, COLING.

[24]  Xiuming Huang Dealing With Conjunctions In A Machine Translation Environment , 1984, COLING.