Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language

ABSTRACT One important finding with the picture–word interference paradigm is that picture-naming performance is facilitated by the presentation of a distractor (e.g., CAP) formally related to the picture name (e.g., “cat”). In two picture-naming experiments we investigated the nature of such form facilitation effect with Mandarin Chinese, separating the effects of phonology and orthography. Significant facilitation effects were observed both when distractors were only orthographically or only phonologically related to the targets. The orthographic effect was overall stronger than the phonological effect. These findings suggest that the classic form facilitation effect in picture–word interference is a mixed effect with multiple loci: it cannot be attributed merely to the nonlexical activation of the target phonological segments from the visual input of the distractor. It seems instead that orthographically only related distractors facilitate the lexical selection process of picture naming, and phonologically only related distractors facilitate the retrieval of target phonological segments.

[1]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[2]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Visual.vs. phonemic contributions to the importance of the initial letter in word identification , 1978 .

[4]  M. Coltheart Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. , 1979 .

[6]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[7]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Speech and talk , 1980 .

[8]  G. Underwood Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[9]  M. Garrett Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[11]  S. Lupker The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[12]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[14]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[15]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[16]  On the stability of finite difference method for solving three-dimensional unsteady gasdynamic equations with artificial viscosity terms , 1987 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[18]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[20]  Gerry Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[21]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[22]  G. Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[23]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[24]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[25]  D. Massaro,et al.  Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[27]  Thomas Crump,et al.  Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. , 1990 .

[28]  B. Butterworth,et al.  Deep and Surface Dyslexia in Chinese , 1992 .

[29]  Ovid J. L. Tzeng,et al.  Language processing in Chinese , 1992 .

[30]  C. Hue Recognition Processes in Character Naming , 1992 .

[31]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[32]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[35]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[36]  Li Hai Tan,et al.  Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. , 1995 .

[37]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Converging evidence for the interaction of semantic and sublexical phonological information in accessing lexical representations for spoken output , 1995 .

[38]  Giovanni B. Flores d'Arcais,et al.  Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters , 1995 .

[39]  C. Perfetti,et al.  VERY EARLY PHONOLOGICAL ACTIVATION IN CHINESE READING , 1995 .

[40]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  Wido La Heij,et al.  THE LOCUS OF ORTHOGRAPHIC-PHONOLOGICAL FACILITATION : REPLY TO ROELOFS, MEYER, AND LEVELT (1996) , 1996 .

[42]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the `tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon , 1997, Cognition.

[43]  David Nunan,et al.  Language Teaching and Research. , 1997 .

[44]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[45]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[46]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification , 1998 .

[47]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[48]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked Phonological Priming in Reading Chinese Words Depends on the Task , 1999 .

[49]  Jian Wang,et al.  Reading Chinese Script : A Cognitive Analysis , 1999 .

[50]  Will one stage and no feedback suffice in lexicalization? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[51]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sublexical Processing in Reading Chinese , 1999 .

[52]  B. Weekes,et al.  Surface dyslexia in chinese , 1999 .

[53]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  Orthographic and Phonological Processing in Reading Chinese Text: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1999 .

[54]  Jian Wang,et al.  Is There Phonologically Mediated Access to Lexical Semantics in Reading Chinese , 1999 .

[55]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese , 1999 .

[56]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Morphology, Orthography, and Phonology in Reading Chinese Compound Words , 1999 .

[57]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[59]  B. Rapp,et al.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.

[60]  G. Feng,et al.  Rowed to recovery: the use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[62]  W. Levelt,et al.  Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995) , 1996 .

[63]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[64]  A Caramazza,et al.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  Albert Costa,et al.  The Production of Noun Phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the Scope of Phonological Encoding in Speech Production☆ , 2002 .

[66]  Henry S.R. Kao,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience Studies of the Chinese Language , 2002 .

[67]  Brendan S. Weekes,et al.  Picture word interference effects on naming in Chinese , 2002 .

[68]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[69]  PHONOLOGICAL, ORTHOGRAPHIC, AND SEMANTIC ACTIVATION IN THE SPEECH PRODUCTION OF CHINESE , 2003 .

[70]  Albert Costa,et al.  Level of categorisation effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2003 .

[71]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[72]  Jie-Li Tsai,et al.  Neuronal correlates of consistency and frequency effects on Chinese character naming: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[73]  S. Law,et al.  A model-driven treatment of a Cantonese-speaking dyslexic patient with impairment to the semantic and nonsemantic pathways , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[74]  Jie-Li Tsai,et al.  Consistency, Regularity, and Frequency Effects in Naming Chinese Characters , 2005 .

[75]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.

[76]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[77]  H. Shu,et al.  The interaction between semantic and the nonsemantic systems in reading: Evidence from Chinese , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[79]  Ted Rule,et al.  Chinese Language , 2009 .

[80]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[81]  Y. Tang,et al.  On the Tip of the Tongue , 2019, Lyric in its Times.