Access to Global and Local Properties in Visual Search for Compound Stimuli

The question of whether attention is drawn more easily to global or local aspects of a stimulus has been debated for more than 100 years We examined it anew, using the visual search task, which distinguishes sensory from attentional effects Subjects searched for a target feature (e g, triangle vs square), which was equally likely to occur in the local elements of a compound search item, in its global structure, or in both Element size and spacing were used to manipulate whether search was generally easier for local or global targets (e g, small size and dense spacing favor global detection) The novel result was that these factors had very little influence on search slopes for local targets, whereas they had large effects on search slopes for global targets This result suggests that a qualitatively different process underlies detection at the global level in traditional compound stimuli Our proposal that an attention-demanding grouping stage is involved was confirmed in a final experiment in which grouping was made selectively difficult at the local level

[1]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Maryanne Martin Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[4]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Jeff Miller Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[6]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[7]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  D Navon,et al.  How Many Trees Does it Take to Make a Forest? , 1983, Perception.

[10]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[11]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[12]  E. Adelson,et al.  Early vision and texture perception , 1988, Nature.

[13]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[14]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients , 1989, Nature.

[17]  D R Badcock,et al.  Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[18]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[19]  L. Robertson,et al.  The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Global Versus Local Processing in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[23]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[27]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  James T. Enns,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995 .