Effects of introspecting about reasons: inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts.

Previous research has shown that analyzing reasons can change people's attitudes, but the exact mechanisms of this effect have not been entirely clear. It was hypothesized that introspecting about reasons focuses people's attention on thoughts that are accessible in memory and increases the extent to which people view their accessible thoughts as applicable to their current attitudes. In Study 1, college students formed initial impressions of a target person, and then positive or negative thoughts about the target person were made memorable. After a delay, half of the participants analyzed reasons for their attitude and half recalled the target person's behaviors. As predicted, people who analyzed reasons reported attitudes toward the target person that were based more on what they could recall about her. Study 2 showed that this effect occurs regardless of whether people initially form an online impression. Implications for the effects of analyzing reasons and for attitude formation are discussed.

[1]  P. Games.  A three-factor model encompassing many possible statistical tests on independent groups. , 1978 .

[2]  J. Forgas.  Affect in Social Judgments and Decisions: A Multiprocess Model , 1992 .

[3]  A. Tesser,et al.  The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation , 1989 .

[4]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Cognitive processes in attitude change , 1994 .

[5]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Acting on one's attitudes: Procedures for linking attitude and behavior , 1982 .

[6]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[7]  E. F. Wright,et al.  Timing of Reasons Analysis and Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1991 .

[8]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction , 1993 .

[9]  M. Zanna,et al.  Effects of salience of extrinsic rewards on liking and loving. , 1980 .

[10]  A. Greenwald.  6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[11]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: the moderating role of attitude accessibility , 1993 .

[13]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[14]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do , 1989 .

[15]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[16]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[17]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986 .

[18]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[19]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Why Do I Love Thee?: Effects of Repeated Introspections about a Dating Relationship on Attitudes toward the Relationship , 1993 .

[20]  Kevin M. Brooks,et al.  Thoughts beyond words : When language overshadows insight , 1993 .

[21]  Donald V. Moser,et al.  Does memory affect judgment? Self-generated versus recall memory measures. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  J. R. Salancik.  Inference of One's Attitude from Behavior Recalled under Linguistically Manipulated Cognitive Sets. , 1974 .

[23]  J. Schooler,et al.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Relationship between the quality of counterattitudinal performance and attitude change. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  F. Strack.  The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies , 1992 .

[26]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[28]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. , 1995 .

[29]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation: data reanalysis and commentary on Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992) , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object , 1989 .

[31]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[32]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Occurrence versus moderation of the automatic attitude activation effect : reply to Fazio , 1993 .

[33]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment , 1992 .

[35]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Lay persons' sensitivity to statistical information: The case of high perceived applicability. , 1984 .

[36]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[37]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[38]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[39]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Attitudes as temporary constructions , 1992 .

[40]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Trait memory and behavior memory: the effects of alternative pathways on impression judgment response times. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[42]  J. Rempel,et al.  Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. , 1988 .

[43]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .