Sequence artefacts in a prospective series of formalin-fixed tumours tested for mutations in hotspot regions by massively parallel sequencing

BackgroundClinical specimens undergoing diagnostic molecular pathology testing are fixed in formalin due to the necessity for detailed morphological assessment. However, formalin fixation can cause major issues with molecular testing, as it causes DNA damage such as fragmentation and non-reproducible sequencing artefacts after PCR amplification. In the context of massively parallel sequencing (MPS), distinguishing true low frequency variants from sequencing artefacts remains challenging. The prevalence of formalin-induced DNA damage and its impact on molecular testing and clinical genomics remains poorly understood.MethodsThe Cancer 2015 study is a population-based cancer cohort used to assess the feasibility of mutational screening using MPS in cancer patients from Victoria, Australia. While blocks were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded in different anatomical pathology laboratories, they were centrally extracted for DNA utilising the same protocol, and run through the same MPS platform (Illumina TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel). The sequencing artefacts in the 1-10% and the 10-25% allele frequency ranges were assessed in 488 formalin-fixed tumours from the pilot phase of the Cancer 2015 cohort. All blocks were less than 2.5 years of age (mean 93 days).ResultsConsistent with the signature of DNA damage due to formalin fixation, many formalin-fixed samples displayed disproportionate levels of C>T/G>A changes in the 1-10% allele frequency range. Artefacts were less apparent in the 10-25% allele frequency range. Significantly, changes were inversely correlated with coverage indicating high levels of sequencing artefacts were associated with samples with low amounts of available amplifiable template due to fragmentation. The degree of fragmentation and sequencing artefacts differed between blocks sourced from different anatomical pathology laboratories. In a limited validation of potentially actionable low frequency mutations, a NRAS G12D mutation in a melanoma was shown to be a false positive.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that DNA damage following formalin fixation remains a major challenge in laboratories working with MPS. Methodologies that assess, minimise or remove formalin-induced DNA damaged templates as part of MPS protocols will aid in the interpretation of genomic results leading to better patient outcomes.

[1]  H. Lehrach,et al.  Genome-Wide Massively Parallel Sequencing of Formaldehyde Fixed-Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissues for Copy-Number- and Mutation-Analysis , 2009, PloS one.

[2]  Bauke Ylstra,et al.  EGFR mutation analysis in sputum of lung cancer patients: a multitechnique study. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[3]  D. Kell BMC Medical Genomics , 2008 .

[4]  Jesse J. Salk,et al.  Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Richard B. Schwab,et al.  Identification of high-confidence somatic mutations in whole genome sequence of formalin-fixed breast cancer specimens , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  A. Oza,et al.  A phase Ib combination study of RO4929097, a gamma-secretase inhibitor, and temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors , 2013, Investigational New Drugs.

[7]  A. von Deimling,et al.  Utilization of a MAB for BRAF(V600E) detection in papillary thyroid carcinoma. , 2012, Endocrine-related cancer.

[8]  T. Lindahl Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA , 1993, Nature.

[9]  Alexander Dobrovic,et al.  Dramatic reduction of sequence artefacts from DNA isolated from formalin-fixed cancer biopsies by treatment with uracil-DNA glycosylase , 2012, Oncotarget.

[10]  Keith L. Ligon,et al.  Profiling Critical Cancer Gene Mutations in Clinical Tumor Samples , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  K. Becker,et al.  Use of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues for diagnosis and therapy in routine clinical settings. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  L. Garraway,et al.  Clinical implications of the cancer genome. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  James Denvir,et al.  DNA damage reduces Taq DNA polymerase fidelity and PCR amplification efficiency. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[14]  A. V. Chernikov,et al.  Heat-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and 8-oxoguanine, a biomarker of damage to DNA. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Rosette Lidereau,et al.  PIK3CA mutation impact on survival in breast cancer patients and in ERα, PR and ERBB2-based subgroups , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[17]  Razelle Kurzrock,et al.  PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  F. Kelleher,et al.  Targeting NRAS in Melanoma , 2012, Cancer journal.

[19]  C. Tzen,et al.  Clinical outcome and pathological features associated with NRAS mutation in cutaneous melanoma , 2011, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[20]  John D Pfeifer,et al.  Comparison of clinical targeted next-generation sequence data from formalin-fixed and fresh-frozen tissue specimens. , 2013, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[21]  Michael Worobey,et al.  The Isolation of Nucleic Acids from Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues–Which Methods Are Useful When? , 2007, PloS one.

[22]  R. Tothill,et al.  BRAF/NRAS Wild-Type Melanomas Have a High Mutation Load Correlating with Histologic and Molecular Signatures of UV Damage , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  Jason Li,et al.  Reducing sequence artifacts in amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded DNA by enzymatic depletion of uracil-containing templates. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  H. Do,et al.  Intratumoral genetic heterogeneity in metastatic melanoma is accompanied by variation in malignant behaviors , 2013, BMC Medical Genomics.

[25]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artifacts induced by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Individualized systems medicine strategy to tailor treatments for patients with chemorefractory acute myeloid leukemia. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[27]  R. Tothill,et al.  Targeted-capture massively-parallel sequencing enables robust detection of clinically informative mutations from formalin-fixed tumours , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  C. Berking,et al.  MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  Mutations induced by ultraviolet light. , 2005, Mutation research.

[30]  Adam C. Marko,et al.  Functional DNA quantification guides accurate next-generation sequencing mutation detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[31]  Ralf Herwig,et al.  Targeted high throughput sequencing in clinical cancer Settings: formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, input amount and tumor heterogeneity , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.