Probabilistic analyses of structural dynamic response with modified Kriging-based moving extremum framework

Abstract Mechanical system is usually composed of multiple complex structures, which endure the combine action of multi-physical fields (e.g., flow field, thermal field, structural field, and so forth) during operation. Structural response, for instance, deformation, stress, strain, fatigue life, etc., have dynamic and time-varying attributes, their values play an important role in safeguarding function properly, and affects the safety of entire system. Probabilistic analyses (including reliability evaluation and sensitivity analysis) can effectively identify potential risk and improve the reliability level. The traditional way is to use Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to achieve probabilistic analyses of complex structures. However, the MC simulation needs to perform a large amount of calculations to complete the specified task analysis, the computational burden is too heavy for the reliability evaluation and sensitivity analysis of structural dynamic response. To efficiently perform probabilistic analyses of structural dynamic response, we therefore developed a surrogate model method, namely modified Kriging-based moving extremum framework (MKMEF, short for), absorbing extremum thought, moving least squares (MLS) technique, Kriging model and collaborative evolution genetic algorithm (CEGA). For this proposed MKMEF, the extremum thought is used to transform dynamic output response into extremum values within a time domain, and the MLS method is applied to obtain efficient samples to derive Kriging model. Besides, the CEGA is employed to replace gradient descent method to resolve maximum likelihood equation (MLE) and find the optimal hyperparameters of Kriging model. Furthermore, an aeroengine high-pressure turbine blisk is treated as a case study, the probabilistic analyses of radial running deformation is executed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method by considering the fluid-thermal-solid interaction. The analytical results show that the reliability degree of turbine blisk is 99.78%, when the allowable value of radial running deformation is 2.5071×10-3 m (determined by 3 sigma levels), and the highest impact on the turbine blisk radial running deformation is gas temperature, followed by inlet velocity, rational speed, material density and outlet pressure. The comparison of methods including direct simulation, response surface method-based extremum thought (ERSM) and traditional Kriging model, shows that the developed MKMEF holds high-efficiency and high-accuracy for the probabilistic analyses of turbine blisk radial running deformation. The presented efforts provide a useful insight for assessing probabilistic analyses of structural dynamic response and enrich mechanical reliability theory.

[1]  Mehdi Dehghan,et al.  A moving least square reproducing polynomial meshless method , 2013 .

[2]  Cheng-Wei Fei,et al.  Moving extremum surrogate modeling strategy for dynamic reliability estimation of turbine blisk with multi-physics fields , 2020 .

[3]  Jie Wen,et al.  Multi-objective reliability-based design optimization approach of complex structure with multi-failure modes , 2017 .

[4]  Shun-Peng Zhu,et al.  Novel probabilistic model for searching most probable point in structural reliability analysis , 2020 .

[5]  Peng Hao,et al.  Novel hybrid robust method for uncertain reliability analysis using finite conjugate map , 2020 .

[6]  Xiaolin Li,et al.  Meshless Galerkin algorithms for boundary integral equations with moving least square approximations , 2011 .

[7]  Yushan Liu,et al.  Global reliability sensitivity analysis based on state dependent parameter method and efficient sampling techniques , 2020 .

[8]  Zhongming Jiang,et al.  A New Reliability Method Combining Kriging and Probability Density Evolution Method , 2017 .

[9]  Jin Cheng,et al.  Application of the response surface methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions , 2009 .

[10]  Guian Qian,et al.  Probabilistic framework for fatigue life assessment of notched components under size effects , 2020 .

[11]  A. Ganji,et al.  Advance first order second moment (AFOSM) method for single reservoir operation reliability analysis: a case study , 2011, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[12]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  High-pressure-turbine clearance control systems: Current practices and future directions , 2004 .

[13]  Zissimos P. Mourelatos,et al.  Reliability-Based Topology Optimization Using Mean-Value Second-Order Saddlepoint Approximation , 2018 .

[14]  Huan Li,et al.  Multilevel nested reliability-based design optimization with hybrid intelligent regression for operating assembly relationship , 2020 .

[15]  Yun-Wen Feng,et al.  Improved Decomposed-Coordinated Kriging Modeling Strategy for Dynamic Probabilistic Analysis of Multicomponent Structures , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[16]  Cheng-Wei Fei,et al.  A stochastic model updating strategy-based improved response surface model and advanced Monte Carlo simulation , 2017 .

[17]  K. Breitung,et al.  Reliability sensitivity estimation with sequential importance sampling , 2018, Structural Safety.

[18]  Yanli Xu,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the frame structure of missiles , 2018 .

[19]  Francesco Cadini,et al.  Global reliability sensitivity analysis by Sobol-based dynamic adaptive kriging importance sampling , 2020 .

[20]  Yongchang Pu,et al.  Reliability analysis of structures using neural network method , 2006 .

[21]  R. A. Shenoi,et al.  Probabilistic strength analysis of rectangular FRP plates using Monte Carlo simulation , 2000 .

[22]  S. Lolas,et al.  Prediction of vehicle reliability performance using artificial neural networks , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Application of Support Vector Machine-Based Classification Extremum Method in Flexible Mechanism , 2020 .

[24]  Shun-Peng Zhu,et al.  Structural dynamic probabilistic evaluation using a surrogate model and genetic algorithm , 2020 .

[25]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Probabilistic Nonlinear Response Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams , 2014 .

[26]  B. Kang,et al.  Stochastic approach to kinematic reliability of open-loop mechanism with dimensional tolerance , 2010 .

[27]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  Second-Order Fourth-Moment Method for Structural Reliability , 2017 .

[28]  Cheng Lu,et al.  Improved Kriging with extremum response surface method for structural dynamic reliability and sensitivity analyses , 2018 .

[29]  K. Nechval,et al.  Probabilistic fatigue reliability assessment , 2007 .

[30]  Cheng Lu,et al.  Weighted Regression-Based Extremum Response Surface Method for Structural Dynamic Fuzzy Reliability Analysis , 2019, Energies.

[31]  Cheng-Wei Fei,et al.  Novel method and model for dynamic reliability optimal design of turbine blade deformation , 2014 .

[32]  Chongmin Song,et al.  Probabilistic fracture mechanics by using Monte Carlo simulation and the scaled boundary finite element method , 2011 .

[33]  Cheng-Wei Fei,et al.  Multi-extremum-modified response basis model for nonlinear response prediction of dynamic turbine blisk , 2021, Engineering with Computers.

[34]  Chengwei FEI,et al.  Dynamic parametric modeling-based model updating strategy of aeroengine casings , 2021, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.

[35]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[36]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  A modified importance sampling method for structural reliability and its global reliability sensitivity analysis , 2018 .

[37]  Lukai Song,et al.  Two-step Extremum Response Surface Method of reliability analysis on flexible mechanism , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE).

[38]  Guang-Chen Bai,et al.  Reliability-based low-cycle fatigue damage analysis for turbine blade with thermo-structural interaction , 2016 .

[39]  Xianguo Wu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of structural health risk in operational tunnels , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[40]  Pan Wang,et al.  Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced Kriging model , 2015 .