Callosal Connections of Primary Visual Cortex Predict the Spatial Spreading of Binocular Rivalry Across the Visual Hemifields

In binocular rivalry, presentation of different images to the separate eyes leads to conscious perception alternating between the two possible interpretations every few seconds. During perceptual transitions, a stimulus emerging into dominance can spread in a wave-like manner across the visual field. These traveling waves of rivalry dominance have been successfully related to the cortical magnification properties and functional activity of early visual areas, including the primary visual cortex (V1). Curiously however, these traveling waves undergo a delay when passing from one hemifield to another. In the current study, we used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to investigate whether the strength of interhemispheric connections between the left and right visual cortex might be related to the delay of traveling waves across hemifields. We measured the delay in traveling wave times (ΔTWT) in 19 participants and repeated this test 6 weeks later to evaluate the reliability of our behavioral measures. We found large interindividual variability but also good test–retest reliability for individual measures of ΔTWT. Using DTI in connection with fiber tractography, we identified parts of the corpus callosum connecting functionally defined visual areas V1–V3. We found that individual differences in ΔTWT was reliably predicted by the diffusion properties of transcallosal fibers connecting left and right V1, but observed no such effect for neighboring transcallosal visual fibers connecting V2 and V3. Our results demonstrate that the anatomical characteristics of topographically specific transcallosal connections predict the individual delay of interhemispheric traveling waves, providing further evidence that V1 is an important site for neural processes underlying binocular rivalry.

[1]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Genetics of microstructure of cerebral white matter using diffusion tensor imaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Frank Tong,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Primary visual cortex and visual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  The Architecture of the Golfer's Brain , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Training induces changes in white matter architecture , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  N. Logothetis Single units and conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  E. Sullivan,et al.  Corpus callosal microstructural integrity influences interhemispheric processing: a diffusion tensor imaging study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  J Trabka,et al.  [Role of the corpus callosum]. , 1968, Acta physiologica Polonica.

[10]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Relating Introspective Accuracy to Individual Differences in Brain Structure , 2010, Science.

[11]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Functional relevance of interindividual differences in temporal lobe callosal pathways: a DTI tractography study. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  S. Clarke,et al.  Occipital cortex in man: Organization of callosal connections, related myelo‐ and cytoarchitecture, and putative boundaries of functional visual areas , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  B. P. Choudhury,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF THE CALLOSAL CONNECTIONS OF THE VISUAL CORTEX. , 1965, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[14]  B. Mulsant,et al.  The Role of the Corpus Callosum in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induced Interhemispheric Signal Propagation , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  Sheng He,et al.  Genes contribute to the switching dynamics of bistable perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[16]  R. Caminiti,et al.  Evolution amplified processing with temporally dispersed slow neuronal connectivity in primates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Cortical Projection Topography of the Human Splenium: Hemispheric Asymmetry and Individual Differences , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[19]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Bound pool fractions complement diffusion measures to describe white matter micro and macrostructure , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  P. Basser,et al.  In vivo measurement of axon diameter distribution in the corpus callosum of rat brain. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash , 1984, Vision Research.

[22]  S. F. Witelson Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Charles Wheatstone On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[24]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Stefan Skare,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Extensive Blockinpiano Blockinpracticing Blockinhas Blockinregionally Specific Blockineffects Blockinon Blockinwhite Blockinmatter Blockindevelopment , 2022 .

[26]  A. Wright,et al.  Magnetic resonance microimaging of intraaxonal water diffusion in live excised lamprey spinal cord , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Salat,et al.  Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  Predicting inter-hemispheric transfer time from the diffusion properties of the corpus callosum in healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients: A combined ERP and DTI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[29]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Temporal-callosal pathway diffusivity predicts phonological skills in children , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  René Westerhausen,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer time and structural properties of the corpus callosum , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[34]  Ione Fine,et al.  Serveur Académique Lausannois SERVAL serval.unil.ch , 2022 .

[35]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Structural neuroplasticity in the sensorimotor network of professional female ballet dancers , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[36]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A ‘sticky’ interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  B. Wandell,et al.  Functional organization of human occipital-callosal fiber tracts. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  David M. Thomasson,et al.  Reliability of fiber tracking measurements in diffusion tensor imaging for longitudinal study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[39]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness in humans , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature.

[41]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The Role of Frontal and Parietal Brain Areas in Bistable Perception , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills , 2007, NeuroImage.

[46]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Individual Differences in White-Matter Microstructure Reflect Variation in Functional Connectivity during Choice , 2007, Current Biology.

[48]  V. Schmithorst,et al.  Differences in white matter architecture between musicians and non-musicians: a diffusion tensor imaging study , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[49]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[51]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.

[52]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Sensitivity Underlying Changes in Visual Consciousness , 2010, Current Biology.

[54]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[55]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Structural and functional bases for individual differences in motor learning , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[56]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[57]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Binocular rivalry: spreading dominance through complex images. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[58]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  R. Blake A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[61]  R. Blake,et al.  V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[62]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  White matter plasticity in the corticospinal tract of musicians: A diffusion tensor imaging study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[63]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Anatomical Properties of the Arcuate Fasciculus Predict Phonological and Reading Skills in Children , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Interhemispheric Connections Shape Subjective Experience of Bistable Motion , 2011, Current Biology.

[65]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Suppression wave dynamics: Visual field anisotropies and inducer strength , 2009, Vision Research.

[67]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Differential language expertise related to white matter architecture in regions subserving sensory‐motor coupling, articulation, and interhemispheric transfer , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[68]  J. Klein,et al.  Human Motor Corpus Callosum: Topography, Somatotopy, and Link between Microstructure and Function , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  Masud Husain,et al.  Expert Cognitive Control and Individual Differences Associated with Frontal and Parietal White Matter Microstructure , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Fornix Microstructure Correlates with Recollection But Not Familiarity Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Primary Visual Cortex Activity along the Apparent-Motion Trace Reflects Illusory Perception , 2005, PLoS biology.

[72]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[73]  Denis Le Bihan,et al.  Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[74]  Steven M. Miller,et al.  Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence , 2000, Current Biology.

[75]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  S. R. Lehky An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[77]  Nicholas G Martin,et al.  Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[79]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.