Aligning Coronary Anatomy and Myocardial Perfusion Territories: An Algorithm for the CORE320 Multicenter Study

Background—Appropriate clinical decisions concerning diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease rely on correct integration of data on coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion. The purpose of this article is to introduce a new left ventricular segmentation model for improved alignment of coronary arterial segments and myocardial perfusion territories, designed for the CORE320 study. Methods and Results—CORE320 is a prospective, multicenter study with a primary objective to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 320-row detector computed tomography (CT) to detect coronary artery luminal stenosis and corresponding myocardial perfusion deficits in patients with suspected coronary artery disease compared with the gold standard of conventional coronary angiography and single-photon emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging. We describe a 19-coronary segment and 13-myocardial territory alignment model, its application in both standard and CT image data sets, and the adjudication process of the initial cohort of patients recruited for the CORE320 study. Adjudication committees reviewed the images of the first 101 gold standard and 107 CT data sets. On the basis of the presented model and rules, all cases for adjudication were correctly identified. During image review, 6 (5.9%) gold standard and 9 (8.4%) CT data sets needed further realignment not triggered by the algorithm. Conclusions—We present a vascular territory distribution model developed for the CORE320 multicenter study, which accounts for variability in coronary anatomy and potential myocardial perfusion territory overlap. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00934037.

[1]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[2]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Min,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[4]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .

[5]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2010, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  Mehrbod S. Javadi,et al.  Definition of Vascular Territories on Myocardial Perfusion Images by Integration with True Coronary Anatomy: A Hybrid PET/CT Analysis , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  N. Paul,et al.  Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Adenosine Stress 64- and 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion Imaging: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Transmural Extent of Perfusion Abnormalities to Predict Atherosclerosis Causing Myocardial Ischemia , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[11]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Charles Davidson,et al.  Correspondence between the 17-segment model and coronary arterial anatomy using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[14]  N. Paul,et al.  Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64 , 2008, European Radiology.

[15]  W. Wijns European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). , 2006, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Juan Angel,et al.  Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteries. , 2005, European heart journal.

[17]  L. Gregorini,et al.  Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis : Severity of the Disease , Severity of Angina Pectoris and Compromised Left Ventricular Function , 2005 .

[18]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Nuclear imaging is more sensitive for the detection of viable myocardium than dobutamine echocardiography , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.

[20]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[21]  R. Parker,et al.  Validation of a model of left ventricular segmentation for interpretation of SPET myocardial perfusion images , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Murray,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Verani,et al.  Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin: A comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[24]  H. Arendrup,et al.  Danish multicenter randomized study of invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with inducible ischemia after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (DANAMI). DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 1997, Circulation.

[25]  N. Geller,et al.  Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. , 1997, Circulation.

[26]  M. Verani,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function during transient coronary occlusion. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  E. Botvinick,et al.  Variability of normal coronary anatomy: implications for the interpretation of thallium-SPECT myocardial perfusion images in single-vessel disease. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  E. Picano,et al.  Identification of viable myocardium by dipyridamole-induced improvement in regional left ventricular function assessed by echocardiography in myocardial infarction and comparison with thallium scintigraphy at rest. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  O. Linton [The American College of Radiology]. , 1992, Journal de radiologie.

[30]  Wallace A. McAlpine,et al.  Heart and Coronary Arteries , 1975 .

[31]  Wallace A. McAlpine,et al.  Heart and Coronary Arteries: An Anatomical Atlas for Clinical Diagnosis, Radiological Investigation, and Surgical Treatment , 1974 .

[32]  J. Hood,et al.  Anatomy of the coronary arteries. , 1973, Seminars in roentgenology.