Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning

This study investigated the effects of group member familiarity during computer-supported collaborative learning. Familiarity may have an impact on online collaboration, because it may help group members to progress more quickly through the stages of group development, and may lead to higher group cohesion. It was therefore hypothesized that increased familiarity would lead to (a) more critical and exploratory group norms, (b) more positive perceptions of online communication and collaboration, (c) more efficient and positive collaboration, and (d) better group performance. To investigate these hypotheses, 105 secondary education students collaborated in groups of three. The results of this study indicate that higher familiarity led to more critical and exploratory group norm perceptions, and more positive perceptions of online communication and collaboration. Furthermore, in familiar groups students needed to devote less time to regulating their task-related activities. The expectation that familiarity would lead to better group performance was not confirmed. These findings imply that online educators pay attention to the effects group member familiarity has on online collaborative learning.

[1]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[2]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  A Computer Program for Assessing Specific Category Rater Agreement for Qualitative Data , 1978 .

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Group Processing on Achievement in Cooperative Groups. , 1990, The Journal of social psychology.

[4]  Carlos José Pereira de Lucena,et al.  R-U-Typing-2-Me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[5]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Automatic coding of online collaboration protocols , 2006 .

[6]  N. Mercer,et al.  From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .

[7]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[8]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[10]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[11]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[12]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups , 2007 .

[13]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[14]  Ad de Jong,et al.  Psychological safety and social support in groupware adoption: A multi-level assessment in education , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[15]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[16]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Dyadic Data Analysis , 2006 .

[18]  Charles G. Halcomb,et al.  The influence of task type, group structure and extraversion on uninhibited speech in computer-mediated communication , 1990 .

[19]  A. King.  Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain , 1994 .

[20]  Gail Corbitt,et al.  The influence of familiarity among group members and extraversion on verbal interaction in proximate GSS sessions , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[21]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Nancy J. Stone,et al.  Understanding coordination in computer-mediated versus face-to-face groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Metacognitive theories , 1995 .

[24]  C. Leaper,et al.  A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[25]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2006 .

[26]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research—An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[27]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[28]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  The agreement process: an empirical investigation of human-human computer-mediated collaborative dialogs , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Gellof Kanselaar,et al.  Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education , 2004 .

[34]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[35]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Determining Sociability, Social Space, and Social Presence in (A)synchronous Collaborative Groups , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Roya Ayman,et al.  Communication Medium and Member Familiarity , 2005 .

[38]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[40]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments , 2007 .

[44]  E. Hobman,et al.  The Expression of Conflict in Computer-Mediated and Face-To-Face Groups , 2002 .

[45]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results , 1994 .

[46]  P. Kirschner,et al.  CSCL in higher education?: a framework for designing multiple collaborative environments , 2004 .

[47]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[48]  J. Silla,et al.  The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media , 2000 .

[49]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  An experimental examination of group history and group support system use on information sharing performance and user perceptions , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[50]  Paul A. Kirschner.  Design, development, and implementation of electronic learning environments for collaborative learning , 2004 .

[51]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Collaborative Learning, Reasoning, and Technology , 2005 .

[52]  T. Postmes,et al.  Quality of decision making and group norms. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Henny van der Meijden,et al.  Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[54]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[55]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[57]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[59]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..