Combined application of multi-criteria optimization and life-cycle sustainability assessment for optimal distribution of alternative passenger cars in U.S.

This research aims to advance the existing sustainability assessment framework for alternative passenger cars with a combination of life-cycle sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision-making. To this end, sixteen macro-level sustainability impacts are evaluated for seven different vehicle types: internal combustion vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with all-electric ranges of 16, 32, 48, and 64 km of electric powered drive, and battery electric vehicles. Additionally, two battery charging scenarios are considered in this analysis with respect to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles; Scenario 1 is based on existing electric power infrastructure in the U.S., while Scenario 2 is an extreme scenario in which electricity to power battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles is generated entirely via solar charging stations. In this study, optimal vehicle distributions are calculated based on the environmental, social, and economic impacts of all vehicle types for each scenario. Various distributions are presented in accordance with the relative importance assigned to each indicator, with different weighting scenarios applied to account for variability in decision-makers' priorities, such as the assignment of higher weights to socio-economic indicators (e.g. maximizing employment) and lower weights to environmental indicators (e.g. minimizing greenhouse gas emissions). In a balanced weighting case (i.e. when environmental and socio-economic indicators have equal importance) under Scenario 1, hybrid electric vehicles have the largest fleet share, comprising 91% of the optimal U.S. passenger car fleet, while internal combustion vehicles dominate the optimal fleet with 99.5% of the optimal fleet share when only socio-economic indicators are given priority. On the other hand, in a balanced weighting case under Scenario 2, the optimal U.S. passenger car fleet consists entirely (100%) of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with 16 km of all-electric range. In the majority of the considered weighting scenarios, battery electric vehicles were not given any share of the optimal vehicle fleet. The proposed framework can be used as a practical decision-making platform when deciding which vehicle type to promote given each vehicle type's respective environmental, social, and economic impacts. Considering that decision makers are often highly influenced by the “silo effect”, i.e. a lack of communication among different agencies and departments (national or international), the proposed framework provides a holistic system-based approach to minimize the silo effect and can enhance the efficiency of future inter/cross/trans-disciplinary works. Furthermore, the outcomes of this study can pave the way for advancement in the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice of current sustainability research.

[1]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Influence of driving patterns on life cycle cost and emissions of hybrid and plug-in electric vehicle powertrains , 2013 .

[2]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[3]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Implications of driving patterns on well-to-wheel performance of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[5]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles , 2013 .

[7]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life cycle assessment of storage systems: the case study of a sodium/nickel chloride battery , 2014 .

[8]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[10]  F. You,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis , 2012 .

[11]  S. Joshi Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[12]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles – the case study of Greece , 2013 .

[13]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Economic-balance hybrid LCA extended with uncertainty analysis: case study of a laptop computer , 2011 .

[15]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2) , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[16]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  M. Goetschalckx Supply Chain Models , 2011 .

[18]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  An environmental-economic evaluation of hybrid electric vehicles: Toyota's Prius vs. its conventional internal combustion engine Corolla , 2002 .

[19]  D. Huisingh,et al.  Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting , 2011 .

[20]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal design and allocation of electrified vehicles and dedicated charging infrastructure for minimum life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost , 2012 .

[21]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[22]  O. Tatari,et al.  upply chain sustainability assessment of the U . S . food manufacturing ectors : A life cycle-based frontier approach , 2013 .

[23]  T. Norgate,et al.  Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes , 2007 .

[24]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products , 2011 .

[25]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  EFFECTS OF SECTOR AGGREGATION ON CO2 MULTIPLIERS IN MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSES , 2014 .

[26]  Abbas S. Milani,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making with life cycle assessment for material selection of composites , 2011 .

[27]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Towards application of life cycle sustainability analysis , 2013 .

[28]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Evaluation of buildings’ redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multipartite sustainability , 2004 .

[29]  C. Manzie,et al.  Conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles for Australian driving conditions. Part 2: Life cycle CO2-e emissions , 2013 .

[30]  Pushpam Kumar Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[31]  Christopher Depcik,et al.  Well to wheels energy and emissions analysis of a recycled 1974 VW Super Beetle converted into a plug-in series hybrid electric vehicle , 2014 .

[32]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[34]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[35]  Stephan Moll,et al.  Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database , 2009 .

[36]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 31 , 2012 .

[37]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[38]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[40]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[41]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Towards greening the U.S. residential building stock: A system dynamics approach , 2014 .

[42]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Balancing Act : a Triple Bottom Line Analysis of the Australian Economy , 2005 .

[43]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Passenger Vehicles , 2014 .

[44]  T. Seager,et al.  Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting , 2005 .

[46]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2011 .

[48]  Diyar Akay,et al.  A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[49]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[50]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  Till M. Bachmann,et al.  Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project’s total cost and multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[52]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Unravelling the Impacts of Supply Chains—A New Triple-Bottom-Line Accounting Approach and Software Tool , 2008 .

[53]  Guohe Huang,et al.  An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management , 2003 .

[54]  Amgad Elgowainy,et al.  Well-To-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009 .

[55]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Stochastic decision modeling for sustainable pavement designs , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[56]  Barbara C. Lippiatt,et al.  BEES 4.0: Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability. Technical Manual and User Guide , 1998 .

[57]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  From LCA to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: concept, practice and future directions , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[58]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches , 2010 .

[59]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process , 2009 .

[60]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the U.S. construction industry , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[61]  Jarod C. Kelly,et al.  Time-dependent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging based on national driving patterns and demographics , 2012 .

[62]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States , 2015 .

[63]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Environmental assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using naturalistic drive cycles and vehicle travel patterns: A Michigan case study , 2013 .

[64]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system , 2012 .

[65]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  AGGREGATION VERSUS DISAGGREGATION IN INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENT , 2011 .

[66]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product , 2005 .

[67]  M. Cellura,et al.  Application of the Structural Decomposition Analysis to assess the indirect energy consumption and air emission changes related to Italian households consumption , 2012 .

[68]  M. Cellura,et al.  The energy and environmental impacts of Italian households consumptions: An input–output approach , 2011 .

[69]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Ecological footprint of nations: Comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input–output analysis , 2014 .

[70]  Nic Lutsey,et al.  EVALUATION OF STATE-LEVEL U.S. ELECTRIC VEHICLE INCENTIVES , 2014 .

[71]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of U.S. residential and commercial buildings: An input–output hybrid life cycle assessment approach , 2014 .

[72]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[73]  Peter D. Blair,et al.  Input-Output Analysis , 2021 .

[74]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[75]  J. Leggett,et al.  President Obama’s Climate Action Plan , 2013 .

[76]  T. Markel,et al.  Plug-In HEV Vehicle Design Options and Expectations , 2006 .

[77]  O. Tatari,et al.  Ranking the sustainability performance of pavements: An intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method , 2014 .

[78]  David Howell,et al.  The EV Everywhere Grand Challenge , 2013, 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27).

[79]  Richard Wood,et al.  The sustainability practitioner's guide to input-output analysis , 2010 .

[80]  Giorgio Rizzoni,et al.  A two-step optimisation method for the preliminary design of a hybrid electric vehicle , 2008 .

[81]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Systems Analysis for Sustainable Engineering: Theory and Applications , 2010 .

[82]  Jennifer Cooper,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[83]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles , 2009 .

[84]  Anne-Marie Jolly-Desodt,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making for environmental impacts optimisation , 2011, Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model..

[85]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators , 2007 .

[86]  Cheng-Wu Chen,et al.  Combining risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate environmental aspects in environmental management system , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[87]  André Åhl Persson,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment : of Solelia Greentech’s Photovoltaic BasedCharging Station for Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[88]  Evangelos,et al.  [Applied Optimization] Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study Volume 44 || A Computational Evaluation of the Original and the Revised AHP , 2000 .