The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite

Objectives This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). Material and Methods Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm3 in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm2 for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm2 for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm2 for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05). Results: For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin. Conclusions Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present.

[1]  E. Sampaio,et al.  Influence of C-factor and light-curing mode on gap formation in resin composite restorations. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[2]  A. Khraisat,et al.  Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II. , 2009, Odonto-stomatologie tropicale = Tropical dental journal.

[3]  L. Hardan,et al.  Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. , 2008, Odonto-stomatologie tropicale = Tropical dental journal.

[4]  R. Mondelli,et al.  TRANSMISSION OF COMPOSITE POLYMERIZATION CONTRACTION FORCE THROUGH A FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AND A RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT , 2007, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[5]  S. Ishikiriama,et al.  Role of additional retention on marginal adaptation and sealing of large resin composite Class II restorations. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[6]  F. Pla,et al.  Shrinkage stress in light-cured composite resins: influence of material and photoactivation mode. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Polymerization contraction of resin composite vs. energy and power density of light-cure. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[8]  Fernanda Cristina Pimentel Garcia,et al.  Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. , 2004, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[9]  R. Sakaguchi,et al.  Contraction force rate of polymer composites is linearly correlated with irradiance. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  B. Hugo,et al.  The influence of plasma arc vs. halogen standard or soft-start irradiation on polymerization shrinkage kinetics of polymer matrix composites. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  D. Bardwell,et al.  An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. , 2002, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  B. Lim,et al.  Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[14]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Effect of ramped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[15]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Novel approach to measure composite conversion kinetics during exposure with stepped or continuous light-curing. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[16]  Kanca J rd,et al.  Pulse activation : Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins , 1999 .

[17]  R. Sakaguchi A review of the curing mechanics of composites and their significance in dental applications. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[18]  J. Kanca,et al.  Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. , 1999, American journal of dentistry.

[19]  P. Koran,et al.  Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[20]  N. Meredith,et al.  In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  M. Vargas,et al.  Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. , 1997, American journal of dentistry.

[22]  W H Douglas,et al.  Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. , 1992, Journal of dentistry.

[23]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[24]  C. Davidson,et al.  Early marginal leakage and shear bond strength of adhesive restorative systems. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[26]  J. Bausch,et al.  Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.