Sub-detector unit timing calibration for brain PET based on L1-norm constraint

A novel sub-detector unit timing calibration method using iterative shrinkage-thresholding (IST) has been developed for a high-resolution brain positron emission tomography (PET) system, which uses a four-layer depth of interaction detector. The timing calibration process is formulated into a linear problem in the proposed method. To obtain a low-variance and robust estimation, an L1-norm constraint is added in the linear equation. Moreover, the detector unit segmentation in the detectors is used to achieve a sub-detector unit level timing calibration. No special source or additional detector element is required for the timing calibration. It is shown that the measured data set from a normal cylindrical phantom filled with radioisotope solution is sufficient for performing a high-precision timing calibration. This method is suitable for PET systems with a large number of crystal elements. In this paper, both simulation and real scanning data were used to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the sub-detector unit level IST method. The timing resolution of a 22Na point source placed at the center of the field of view in the brain PET system was evaluated using different timing calibration methods, along with the optimal selection of detector unit segmentation, to validate the IST method. The timing resolution was improved from 3.34 ns (at full width at half maximum (FWHM)) to 2.54 ns (FWHM) through implementing the IST and the detector unit segmentation.

[1]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  K. Ote,et al.  Development of a new brain PET scanner based on single event data acquisition , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[3]  Ambuj Tewari,et al.  Stochastic methods for l1 regularized loss minimization , 2009, ICML '09.

[4]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  R. Yamada,et al.  Development of a high-resolution four-layer DOI detector using MPPCs for brain PET , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[6]  M. Casey,et al.  A central positron source to perform the timing alignment of detectors in a PET scanner , 2005 .

[7]  S.S. Junnarkar,et al.  Digital Coincidence Processing for the RatCAP Conscious Rat Brain PET Scanner , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation of an instrument to improve PET timing alignment , 2010 .

[9]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Time of flight coincidence timing calibration techniques using radioactive sources , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[10]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[11]  J. Karp,et al.  Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  Convex Optimization of Coincidence Time Resolution for a High-Resolution PET System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Antonin Chambolle,et al.  Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  M. Conti Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  J S Karp,et al.  TOF PET offset calibration from clinical data , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.