Ethics of quantification or quantification of ethics?

[1]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[2]  Funny Numbers , 2020, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[3]  P. Boulanger,et al.  Technoscience, policy and the new media. Nexus or vortex? , 2020 .

[4]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Escape from model-land , 2019, Economics.

[5]  S. Lo Piano,et al.  Nutrition and public health economic evaluations under the lenses of post normal science , 2019, Futures.

[6]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A short comment on statistical versus mathematical modelling , 2019, Nature Communications.

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Making sense of science for policy under conditions of complexity and uncertainty , 2019 .

[8]  R. Strand.  Striving for Reflexive Science , 2019, fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation Issue 48/July 2019 - Proceedings of the Conference "Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities for a European Research Agenda Valuation of SSH in mission-oriented research".

[9]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Scientists rise up against statistical significance , 2019, Nature.

[10]  M. Peters,et al.  Citizen science and post-normal science in a post-truth era: Democratising knowledge; socialising responsibility , 2019, Educational Philosophy and Theory.

[11]  Shoshana Zuboff.  The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power , 2019 .

[12]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Why so many published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Why science’s crisis should not become a political battling ground , 2018, Futures.

[14]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Practice and perspectives in the validation of resource management models , 2018, Nature Communications.

[15]  Philip B. Stark,et al.  Cargo‐cult statistics and scientific crisis , 2018, Significance.

[16]  E. Berman,et al.  The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now? , 2018 .

[17]  Jerry Z. Muller.  The Tyranny of Metrics , 2018 .

[18]  Zachary Chase Lipton.  The mythos of model interpretability , 2016, ACM Queue.

[19]  Yuval Harari,et al.  21 Lessons for the 21st Century , 2018 .

[20]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Different Modelling Purposes , 2019, Simulating Social Complexity.

[21]  A. Supiot.  Governance by Numbers: The Making of a Legal Model of Allegiance , 2017 .

[22]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Problematic Quantifications: a Critical Appraisal of Scenario Making for a Global ‘Sustainable’ Food Production , 2017 .

[23]  Ellen P. Goodman,et al.  Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart City , 2017 .

[24]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  What is science’s crisis really about? , 2017 .

[25]  Adam J. Ruben.  Another tenure-track scientist bites the dust , 2017 .

[26]  Michael J. Zyphur,et al.  Is Quantitative Research Ethical? Tools for Ethically Practicing, Evaluating, and Using Quantitative Research , 2017 .

[27]  R. Harris,et al.  Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope, and Wastes Billions , 2017 .

[28]  Sylke V. Schnepf,et al.  Do PISA data justify PISA-based education policy? , 2017 .

[29]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Epilogue: the future of economic development between utopias and dystopias , 2016 .

[30]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Trends in sensitivity analysis practice in the last decade. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Questioning the Ecological Footprint , 2016 .

[32]  Cathy O'Neil,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2016, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers.

[33]  Richard McElreath,et al.  The natural selection of bad science , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[34]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management , 2015 .

[35]  M. Giampietro,et al.  The fallacy of evidence based policy , 2015, 1607.07398.

[36]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth , 2015 .

[37]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science, Philosophy and Sustainability : The End of the Cartesian dream , 2015 .

[38]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research , 2015, Circulation research.

[39]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Climate Models as Economic Guides: Scientific Challenge or Quixotic Quest? , 2015 .

[40]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Footworking in Circles , 2014 .

[41]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Footprint facts and fallacies: A response to Giampietro and Saltelli (2014) “Footprints to Nowhere” , 2014 .

[42]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Footprints to nowhere , 2014 .

[43]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  Are all models wrong? , 2020, Computational and systems oncology.

[44]  William E. Rees,et al.  The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth , 2013, PLoS biology.

[45]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints , 2013, PLoS biology.

[46]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  The Ecological Footprint Remains a Misleading Metric of Global Sustainability , 2013, PLoS biology.

[47]  H. Simons,et al.  A regrettable oversight or a significant omission? Ethical considerations in quantitative research in education , 2012 .

[48]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  What do I make of your Latinorum? Sensitivity auditing of mathematical modelling. , 2012, 1211.2668.

[49]  S. Rayner.  Uncomfortable knowledge: the social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses , 2012 .

[50]  S. Shafer.  All models are wrong. , 2012, Anesthesiology.

[51]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[52]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? , 2011, 1104.3009.

[53]  Philip Mirowski.  Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science , 2011 .

[54]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications , 2011 .

[55]  Andre Vanoli,et al.  On the Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (2009) , 2010 .

[56]  J. C. van den Bergh,et al.  On the policy relevance of ecological footprints. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[57]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis didn't help. A practitioner's critique of the Stern review , 2010 .

[58]  Fabien Éloire,et al.  Le classement de Shanghai. Histoire, analyse et critique , 2010 .

[59]  Alex Pentl,et al.  Reality Mining of Mobile Communications: Toward A New Deal On Data , 2009 .

[60]  Paul Krugman,et al.  The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 , 2008 .

[61]  Linda Pilkey-Jarvis,et al.  :Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Cant Predict the Future , 2007 .

[62]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[63]  J. Feldman.  Condorcet et la mathématique sociale. Enthousiasmes et bémols , 2005 .

[64]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[65]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Models as metaphors , 2003 .

[66]  Granino A. Korn,et al.  An Introduction to Models , 2003 .

[67]  E. Reinert.  Full circle: economics from scholasticism through innovation and back into mathematical scholasticism: Reflections on a 1769 Price essay: “Why is it that economics so far has gained so few advantages from physics and mathematics?” , 2000 .

[68]  H. Simons,et al.  Situated ethics in educational research , 2000 .

[69]  Viktor Mayer-Schönberger,et al.  Reinventing Capitalism in the Age of Big Data , 2000 .

[70]  P. N. Edwards.  GLOBAL CLIMATE SCIENCE, UNCERTAINTY AND POLITICS: DATA-LADEN MODELS, MODEL-FILTERED DATA , 1999 .

[71]  M. Norton Wise,et al.  Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life@@@The Values of Precision , 1996 .

[72]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[73]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[74]  James Roy King.  Models as Metaphors , 1991 .

[75]  P. Guttorp,et al.  The Taming of Chance. , 1992 .

[76]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[77]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for Policy: Uncertainty and Quality , 1990 .

[78]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The Merger of Knowledge With Power: Essays in Critical Science , 1990 .

[79]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process , 1989 .

[80]  J. Ravetz.  Usable Knowledge, Usable Ignorance , 1987 .

[81]  L. Winner.  The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .

[82]  C. Goodhart.  Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience , 1984 .

[83]  Marilyn Frankenstein.  Critical Mathematics Education: An Application of Paulo Freire's Epistemology , 1983 .

[84]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems , 1981 .

[85]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change* , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[86]  Jean-françois Lyotard.  La condition postmoderne : Rapport sur le savoir , 1979 .

[87]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1973 .

[88]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[89]  J. Ravetz.  Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .

[90]  M. Friedman,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .