Effect of Surfactant SDS, Tween 80, Triton X-100 and Rhamnolipid on Biodegradation of Hydrophobic Organic Pollutants

The effects of synthetic surfactants SDS, Tween 80, Triton X-100 on bacteria Flauobacteriurn sp. Q14 capable of degrading gasoline were studied. Biosurfactant rhamnolipid was used to analyze the effect on the biodegradation of n-hexadecane and the cell surface hydrophobicity for Bacillus sp. DQ02. The results showed that all the three chemical surfactants could delay the logarithmic phase of Flauobacteriurn sp. Q14. The anionic surfactant SDS did not significantly increase the degradation rate of diesel both at day 2 and 4. The maximum degradation value was 42.2% and 44.5% at 100 mg/L in the presence of Triton X-100 and Tween 80, respectively. The removal efficiency declined with the increase of concentration of surfactants over 100 mg/L. At day 4, the maximum degradation value reached 44.7% and 46.3% at 200 mg/L. The degradation of n-hexadecane by Bacillus sp.DQ02 was increased 11.6% within 48 h in the presence of the rhamnolipid than that of in the absence of the rhamnolipid. The growth of the strain and BATH (bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon) increased with obviously in the presence of the rhamnolipid. And the BATH reached 44% in the presence of rhamnolipid. Moreover, the interfacial tension decreased almost half with the addition of rhamnolipid.

[1]  Hongqi Wang,et al.  Degradability of n-hexadecane by Bacillus cereus DQ01 isolated from oil contaminated soil from Daqing oil field, China , 2009 .

[2]  R. Atlas Microbial hydrocarbon degradation—bioremediation of oil spills , 2007 .

[3]  Ajay Singh,et al.  Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[4]  Z. Yao,et al.  Isolation and characterization of gasoline-degrading bacteria from gas station leaking-contaminated soils. , 2006, Journal of environmental sciences.

[5]  J. Oudot,et al.  Effects of nutrient concentration on the biodegradation of crude oil and associated microbial populations in the soil , 2005 .

[6]  V. Srivastava,et al.  Chemical and biological removal of cyanides from aqueous and soil-containing systems , 1994, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[7]  W. Weber,et al.  Preferential surfactant utilization by a PAH-degrading strain: effects on micellar solubilization phenomena. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Catherine N. Mulligan,et al.  Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review , 2001 .

[9]  A. Bodour,et al.  Rhamnolipid-Induced Removal of Lipopolysaccharide from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Effect on Cell Surface Properties and Interaction with Hydrophobic Substrates , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  A. Tiehm,et al.  Surfactant-Enhanced Mobilization and Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Manufactured Gas Plant Soil , 1997 .

[11]  T. Ahmed,et al.  Factors affecting the nonionic surfactant‐enhanced biodegradation of phenanthrene , 1997 .

[12]  Shigeaki Harayama,et al.  Physicochemical Properties and Biodegradability of Crude Oil , 1997 .

[13]  P. Jaffé,et al.  Bioavailability of Hydrophobic Compounds Partitioned into the Micellar Phase of Nonionic Surfactants , 1996 .

[14]  W. Rulkens,et al.  Influence of nonionic surfactants on bioavailability and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.