Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial

BackgroundThere is a clear link between irregular breathing and errors in medical imaging and radiation treatment. The audiovisual biofeedback system is an advanced form of respiratory guidance that has previously demonstrated to facilitate regular patient breathing. The clinical benefits of audiovisual biofeedback will be investigated in an upcoming multi-institutional, randomised, and stratified clinical trial recruiting a total of 75 lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.Methods/DesignTo comprehensively perform a clinical evaluation of the audiovisual biofeedback system, a multi-institutional study will be performed. Our methodological framework will be based on the widely used Technology Acceptance Model, which gives qualitative scales for two specific variables, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which are fundamental determinants for user acceptance. A total of 75 lung cancer patients will be recruited across seven radiation oncology departments across Australia. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio, with 2/3 of the patients being recruited into the intervention arm and 1/3 in the control arm. 2:1 randomisation is appropriate as within the interventional arm there is a screening procedure where only patients whose breathing is more regular with audiovisual biofeedback will continue to use this system for their imaging and treatment procedures. Patients within the intervention arm whose free breathing is more regular than audiovisual biofeedback in the screen procedure will remain in the intervention arm of the study but their imaging and treatment procedures will be performed without audiovisual biofeedback. Patients will also be stratified by treating institution and for treatment intent (palliative vs. radical) to ensure similar balance in the arms across the sites. Patients and hospital staff operating the audiovisual biofeedback system will complete questionnaires to assess their experience with audiovisual biofeedback. The objectives of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of audiovisual biofeedback on breathing motion, the patient experience and clinical confidence in the system, clinical workflow, treatment margins, and toxicity outcomes.DiscussionThis clinical trial marks an important milestone in breathing guidance studies as it will be the first randomised, controlled trial providing the most comprehensive evaluation of the clinical impact of breathing guidance on cancer radiation therapy to date. This study is powered to determine the impact of AV biofeedback on breathing regularity and medical image quality. Objectives such as determining the indications and contra-indications for the use of AV biofeedback, evaluation of patient experience, radiation toxicity occurrence and severity, and clinician confidence will shed light on the design of future phase III clinical trials.Trial registrationThis trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), its trial ID is ACTRN12613001177741.

[1]  P. Keall,et al.  Audiovisual biofeedback improves motion prediction accuracy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[2]  Julian C. Hong,et al.  An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four‐dimensional computed tomography images , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  P J Keall,et al.  Investigation of patient, tumour and treatment variables affecting residual motion for respiratory-gated radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Wong,et al.  The use of active breathing control (ABC) to reduce margin for breathing motion. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R. Mohan,et al.  Quantifying the predictability of diaphragm motion during respiration with a noninvasive external marker. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  I. Yeo,et al.  The Effect of Breathing Biofeedback on Breathing Reproducibility and Patient's Dose in Respiration-gated Radiotherapy , 2013 .

[8]  T. Treasure,et al.  Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials? , 1998, BMJ.

[9]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a prototype audiovisual biofeedback device incorporating a patient-specific guiding waveform , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  R Mohan,et al.  Predicting respiratory motion for four-dimensional radiotherapy. , 2004, Medical physics.

[13]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Paul J. Keall,et al.  Commissioning and quality assurance for a respiratory training system based on audiovisual biofeedback , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  Walther Fledelius,et al.  Variations in magnitude and directionality of respiratory target motion throughout full treatment courses of stereotactic body radiotherapy for tumors in the liver , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[16]  Cumulative lung dose for several motion management strategies as a function of pretreatment patient parameters. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Joseph O. Deasy,et al.  Radiation DoseVolume Effects in the Lung , 2010 .

[18]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Real-time tumor tracking in the lung using an electromagnetic tracking system. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Paul Keall,et al.  The internal–external respiratory motion correlation is unaffected by audiovisual biofeedback , 2014, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[20]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Exploring breathing pattern irregularity with projection-based method. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  4D computed tomography for treatment planning , 2003 .

[22]  Peter B. Greer,et al.  Audiovisual biofeedback improves image quality and reduces scan time for respiratory-gated 3D MRI , 2014 .

[23]  L. Marks,et al.  Challenges in defining radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[25]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Audio-visual biofeedback for respiratory-gated radiotherapy: impact of audio instruction and audio-visual biofeedback on respiratory-gated radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Byungchul Cho,et al.  The impact of audio-visual biofeedback on 4D PET images: results of a phantom study. , 2012, Medical physics.

[27]  R. George,et al.  Audio-visual biofeedback does not improve the reliability of target delineation using maximum intensity projection in 4-dimensional computed tomography radiation therapy planning. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[29]  D. Low,et al.  A comparison between amplitude sorting and phase-angle sorting using external respiratory measurement for 4D CT. , 2006, Medical physics.

[30]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Retrospective analysis of artifacts in four-dimensional CT images of 50 abdominal and thoracic radiotherapy patients. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Marion K Campbell,et al.  The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[32]  Y D Mutaf,et al.  The impact of temporal inaccuracies on 4DCT image quality. , 2007, Medical physics.

[33]  Benjamin Movsas,et al.  Higher biologically effective dose of radiotherapy is associated with improved outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: an analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  E Yorke,et al.  Phase and amplitude binning for 4D-CT imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  T. Pan,et al.  4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT. , 2004, Medical physics.

[36]  M. Martel,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  Paul Keall,et al.  Audiovisual biofeedback improves diaphragm motion reproducibility in MRI. , 2012, Medical physics.