Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance

There is consensus in the marketing literature that market knowledge and cross-functional collaboration are two fundamental resources for successful product innovation. However, few studies examine the dimensions or characteristics of market knowledge and how and why these resources influence product innovation performance. Drawing on contingency theory and the knowledge-based view of the firm, the authors argue that knowledge integration mechanisms may account for the effects of market knowledge dimensions (i.e., breadth, depth, tacitness, and specificity) and cross-functional collaboration on product innovation performance. They find that market knowledge specificity and cross-functional collaboration affect product innovation performance through knowledge integration mechanisms. In contrast, whereas the effect of market knowledge depth is partially mediated, market knowledge breadth has a direct, unmediated effect on product innovation performance. A test of an alternative moderating perspective shows that the effects of market knowledge depth and cross-functional collaboration on product innovation are negatively moderated by knowledge integration mechanisms. By showing the differential effects of market knowledge dimensions on product innovation performance, the authors provide a more refined understanding of the interplay among market knowledge, its integration, and the firm's performance in product innovation. The authors also conclude that by overlooking the role of knowledge integration mechanisms, previous research may have provided an overly optimistic view of the value of cross-functional collaboration in product innovation.

[1]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[2]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[3]  Mona V. Makhija,et al.  The Role Of Organizational Controls In Managing Knowledge , 2006 .

[4]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Cross-Functional 'Coopetition': The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition within Firms , 2006 .

[5]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  The Contingent Value of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program Performance , 2005 .

[6]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[7]  John E. Spillan,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Performance: A Study of Small‐Sized Service Retailers Using MARKOR Scale , 2005 .

[8]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .

[9]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[10]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[11]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[12]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Marketing Strategy Comprehensiveness , 2004 .

[14]  S. Slater,et al.  CONDUCTING SURVEY RESEARCH IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 2004 .

[15]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Incongruity on New Product Development in Five Countries: A Marketing View , 2003 .

[16]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Safeguarding Investments in Asymmetric Interorganizational Relationships: Theory and Evidence , 2003 .

[17]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[18]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business , 2002 .

[19]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[20]  S. Zahra,et al.  Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization , 2002 .

[21]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[22]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .

[23]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[24]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[25]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Reducing marketing’s conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms , 2000 .

[26]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[28]  Willow A. Sheremata.  Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[29]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance , 1999 .

[30]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[31]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Another look at how Toyota integrates product development , 1998 .

[32]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[33]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[34]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[35]  R. Grover,et al.  From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[36]  Sanjiv Kumar,et al.  The design of coordination and control mechanisms for managing joint venture–parent relationships , 1998 .

[37]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[38]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  Marketing's integration with other departments , 1998 .

[39]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Comparative Versus Noncomparative Advertis-ing: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[40]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing Communication between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identification , 1997 .

[41]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Impact of Just‐in‐Time Task Scope Versus Just‐in‐Time Workflow Integration on Organizational Design , 1997 .

[42]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[43]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[44]  Roger L. Brown.  Assessing specific mediational effects in complex theoretical models , 1997 .

[45]  Jeffrey B. Schmidt,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives , 1997 .

[46]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[47]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[48]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[49]  Kenneth B. Kahn.  Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance , 1996 .

[50]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[51]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach , 1995 .

[52]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance , 1995 .

[53]  R. Ping.  A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables , 1995 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[55]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[56]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[57]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[58]  G. Day,et al.  Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[59]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[60]  James M. Sinkula.  Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[61]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences , 1993 .

[62]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[63]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[64]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[65]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[66]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[67]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[68]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[69]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation , 1989 .

[70]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  The Contingency Approach: Its Foundations and Relevance to Theory Building and Research in Marketing , 1988 .

[71]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[72]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence , 1987 .

[73]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[74]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[76]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[77]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[78]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[79]  D. Sörbom.  A GENERAL METHOD FOR STUDYING DIFFERENCES IN FACTOR MEANS AND FACTOR STRUCTURE BETWEEN GROUPS , 1974 .

[80]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[81]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .