Sheltering efficiency of wind barriers on bridges

Sheltering efficiency of wind barriers on viaducts was experimentally studied in a boundary layer wind tunnel. Effects of wind incidence angle on flow field characteristics in the wake of a wind barrier were reported. Mean velocity fields and vorticity fields were determined using the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique. Freestream velocities were measured using hot-wire and Pitot tube. Results indicate a possibility of wind-induced instability of high-sided vehicles at larger vertical incidence angles, especially in the traffic lane close to trailing edge of the bridge, as velocity fluctuations and mean freestream velocities approach the road surface when increasing the vertical incidence angle. Removing elements from the wind barrier causes very large local velocities immediately downstream from a barrier and strong vorticity in the entire area in the wake of a wind barrier. Variations in horizontal incidence angle do not seem to affect flow field characteristics significantly. Without a wind barrier, wind velocities on bridges reach 80% of the freestream velocity at height as low as 1 m full-scale along with very strong vorticity in the immediate vicinity of the road surface.

[1]  Christopher Baker.  Ground vehicles in high cross winds part III: The interaction of aerodynamic forces and the vehicle system , 1991 .

[2]  R. Cooper.  Atmospheric turbulence with respect to moving ground vehicles , 1984 .

[3]  Erich J. Plate,et al.  The aerodynamics of shelter belts , 1971 .

[4]  Iztok Ciglaric,et al.  Analysis of a Bridge Structure and its Wind Barrier under Wind Loads , 2005 .

[5]  Wim Cornelis,et al.  Wind tunnel study on wind speed reduction through successive synthetic windscreens , 2001 .

[6]  J. D. Holmes,et al.  Wind Loading of Structures , 2001 .

[7]  David R. Miller,et al.  Wind reduction by a highly permeable tree shelter-belt , 1974 .

[8]  Gordon M. Heisler,et al.  2. Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow , 1988 .

[9]  D. C. Stevenson,et al.  Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer , 1977 .

[11]  Jo Yung Wong,et al.  Theory of ground vehicles , 1978 .

[12]  Gl Larose,et al.  On the Reynolds number sensitivity of the aerodynamics of bluff bodies with sharp edges , 2006 .

[13]  Peter N. Joubert,et al.  The form drag of two-dimensional bluff-plates immersed in turbulent boundary layers , 1968, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Christopher Baker,et al.  The reduction of accident risk for high sided road vehicles in cross winds , 1992 .

[15]  Margitta Nord,et al.  Shelter effects of vegetation belts — Results of field measurements , 1991 .

[16]  Chris Baker,et al.  Ground vehicles in high cross winds part I: Steady aerodynamic forces , 1991 .

[17]  Zhibao Dong,et al.  A wind tunnel simulation of the mean velocity fields behind upright porous fences , 2007 .

[18]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Effects of the cross-wind gust strength on vehicle aerodynamics , 2011 .

[19]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  1 – Effects of Windbreaks on Turbulent Transport and Microclimate , 1988 .

[20]  Wolf-Heinrich Hucho.  Aerodynamik der stumpfen Körper , 2002 .

[21]  Günter Schewe,et al.  Reynolds-number effects in flow around more-or-less bluff bodies , 2001 .

[22]  H. Blenk,et al.  Strömungstechnische Beiträge zum Windschutz : Strömungsuntersuchungen an Windhindernissen am Modell und in der freien Natur ; Teil 2, Tafeln , 1956 .

[23]  Hrvoje Kozmar,et al.  Wind barriers on bridges: Effects of wind incidence angle on flow field characteristics , 2009 .

[24]  Hunter Rouse,et al.  Experiments on two-dimensional flow over a normal wall , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  M. J. Ryall,et al.  MANUAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING , 2000 .

[26]  Wim Cornelis,et al.  Wind tunnel study on rough and smooth surface turbulent approach flow and on inclined windscreens , 2003 .

[27]  Christopher Baker,et al.  An experimental study of the aerodynamic behaviour of high sided lorries in cross winds , 1994 .

[28]  Wolfgang Rauch,et al.  On the Reynolds number sensitivity of smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2014 .

[29]  J. Gandemer,et al.  The aerodynamic characteristics of windbreaks, resulting in empirical design rules , 1981 .

[30]  K. J. McAneney,et al.  Multiple windbreaks: An aeolean ensemble , 1991 .

[31]  M. Jensen,et al.  Shelter effect: investigations into the aerodynamics of shelter and its effects on climate and crops , 1954 .

[32]  Michael R. Raupach,et al.  A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple windbreaks, part I: Velocity fields , 1996 .

[33]  B. Ruck,et al.  Double-Arranged Mound-Mounted Shelterbelts: Influence of Porosity on Wind Reduction between the Shelters , 2005 .

[34]  D. W. Fryrear,et al.  Mean flow and shear stress distributions as influenced by vegetative windbreak structure , 1995 .

[35]  Hrvoje Kozmar,et al.  Testing aerodynamic properties of road windscreens , 2009 .

[36]  Wim Cornelis,et al.  Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control , 2005 .