Implementing human factors in clinical practice

Objectives To understand whether aviation-derived human factors training is acceptable and useful to healthcare professionals. To understand whether and how healthcare professionals have been able to implement human factors approaches to patient safety in their own area of clinical practice. Methods Qualitative, longitudinal study using semi-structured interviews and focus groups, of a multiprofessional group of UK NHS staff (from the emergency department and operating theatres) who have received aviation-derived human factors training. Results The human factors training was evaluated positively, and thought to be both acceptable and relevant to practice. However, the staff found it harder to implement what they had learned in their own clinical areas, and this was principally attributed to features of the informal organisational cultures. Conclusions In order to successfully apply human factors approaches in hospital, careful consideration needs to be given to the local context and informal culture of clinical practice.

[1]  J. Evetts Sociological Analysis of Professionalism: Past, Present and Future , 2011 .

[2]  S. Timmons Nurses resisting information technology. , 2003, Nursing inquiry.

[3]  I. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Medicine and management in a comparative perspective: the case of Denmark and England. , 2009, Sociology of health & illness.

[4]  S. Pickard The Professionalization of General Practitioners with a Special Interest: Rationalization, Restratification and Governmentality , 2009 .

[5]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  R. Glavin,et al.  Integrating human factors into the medical curriculum , 2003, Medical education.

[7]  K. Catchpole Spreading human factors expertise in healthcare: untangling the knots in people and systems , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[8]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature , 2012, BMJ quality & safety.

[9]  G. Armitage Human error theory: relevance to nurse management. , 2009, Journal of nursing management.

[10]  R. Dingwall,et al.  Narrative Review of the Uk Patient Safety Research Portfolio , 2010, Journal of health services research & policy.

[11]  John D. Voss,et al.  Changing conversations: teaching safety and quality in residency training. , 2008, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  Ken R Catchpole,et al.  A Multicenter Trial of Aviation-Style Training for Surgical Teams , 2010, Journal of patient safety.

[14]  R. Mannion,et al.  Organisational culture and quality of health care , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[15]  N. Toff,et al.  Human factors in anaesthesia: lessons from aviation. , 2010, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  Alissa L. Russ,et al.  A Human Factors Investigation of Medication Alerts: Barriers to Prescriber Decision-Making and Clinical Workflow , 2009, AMIA.

[17]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  ‘It’s an Interesting Conversation I’m Hearing’: The Doctor as Manager , 2004 .

[18]  D. Plamping Change and resistance to change in the NHS , 1998, BMJ.

[19]  S. Harrison,et al.  Identity, Contract and Enterprise in a Primary Care Setting: An English General Practice Case Study , 2008 .

[20]  Lorelei Jones,et al.  Shifting discourses of professionalism: a case study of general practitioners in the United Kingdom. , 2006, Sociology of health & illness.

[21]  E. Anderson,et al.  Learning from lives: a model for health and social care education in the wider community context , 2003, Medical education.

[22]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .