Power and Resistance: Variations on “what's going on politically in and around organizations?”

M@n@gement Copies of this article can be made free of charge and without securing permission, for purposes of teaching, research, or library reserve. Consent to other kinds of copying, such as that for creating new works, or for resale, must be obtained from both the journal editor(s) and the author(s). M@n@gement is a double-blind refereed journal where articles are published in their original language as soon as they have been accepted. Power and Resistance : Variations on " what's going on politically in and around organizations? " M@n@gement, 14(1), 1-46. Association Internationale de Management Stratégique Unplugged 2 Power and Resistance : Variations on " what's going on politically in and around organizations? " INTRODUCTION Power is one of the central concepts of both the social sciences in general and organizational and management theory in particular. It is to be found at the heart of all social relationships, and forms a leitmotiv In other words, it is an integral part of social living involving groups or individuals within organizations. Although its role is a pivotal one, the " scientific " treatment to which this concept is subjected gives rise to a paradox in that substantial organizational research overtly dedicated to the topic are still few and far between. This is in spite of the numerous empirical projects which have been carried out and the excellent synoptic works which now exist. All things considered, one could assume either that power is merely subordinate to other organization based social phenomena or that, by dint of its very significance, power merits only the courtesy of a " passing " glance, and constitutes so obvious a topic of discussion that we need barely tarry to pay it any particular attention. The secondary role to which power has been relegated by organizational research leads to a shortcoming in the way in which it is conceptualized in organizational and management studies on 'politics'. Indeed, only seldom do scholars see organizations and institutions as political groupings when conceptualizing power. They tend, rather, to make for a theoretical standpoint, and to draw on tried and tested concepts from social theory which do not allow sufficient light to be shed on the specificity (or non-specificity) of political goings-on within organizations. This is in spite of the fact that political issues are increasingly to be found at the heart of the dynamics at work in organizations: the principles of " new …

[1]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action. , 1980 .

[2]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Claude Michaud,et al.  Making Strategy and Organization Compatible , 2003 .

[4]  Jean-Claude Thoenig,et al.  Territorial Administration and Political Control: Decentralization in France , 2005 .

[5]  R. Dahl The concept of power , 2007 .

[6]  S. Harrison Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice , 2001 .

[7]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972). , 1977 .

[8]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[9]  Malcolm Waters Alternative Organizational Formations: A Neoweberian Typology of Polycratic Administrative Systems , 1993 .

[10]  Richard Scase Managing the corporate interest - control and resistance in an American-bank , 1992 .

[11]  Michael A. Berger,et al.  Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'Etat, Insurgency, and Mass Movements , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Jean-Daniel Reynaud,et al.  Les règles du jeu : l'action collective et la régulation sociale , 1989 .

[13]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Social Movements, Field Frames, and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective , 2003 .

[14]  Donald F. Roy Quota Restriction and Goldbricking in a Machine Shop , 1952, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  G. Poggi Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[16]  Jeremy Brooke Straughn,et al.  “Taking the State at Its Word”: The Arts of Consentful Contention in the German Democratic Republic1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Rick Fantasia,et al.  Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers , 1988 .

[18]  Dennis Tourish,et al.  Manufacturing Conformity : Leadership Through Coercive Persuasion in Business Organisations , 2010 .

[19]  Gerhard Göhler,et al.  ‘Power to’ and ‘Power over’ , 2009 .

[20]  Jean-Claude Thoenig,et al.  The Regulation of Complex Organized Systems. , 1976 .

[21]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Domination, resistance, compliance ... discourse , 1991 .

[22]  C. Morrill,et al.  Power Plays: How Social Movements and Collective Action Create New Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[23]  Robyn Thomas,et al.  Theorizing the Micro-politics of Resistance: New Public Management and Managerial Identities in the UK Public Services , 2005 .

[24]  Jean-Claude Thoenig,et al.  Public transportation policy making in France as an implementation problem , 1979 .

[25]  David Courpasson,et al.  When Managers Rebel , 2010 .

[26]  Martin Trow,et al.  Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union , 1957 .

[27]  Craig Calhoun,et al.  The problem of identity in collective action , 1991 .

[28]  J. March The Business Firm as a Political Coalition , 1962, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  J. Ford,et al.  Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story , 2008 .

[30]  J. Langton The Ecological Theory of Bureaucracy: The Case of Josiah Wedgwood and the British Pottery Industry , 1984 .

[31]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[32]  Antonio Gramsci Selections from the prison notebooks , 2020, The Applied Theatre Reader.