How do hydrologic modeling decisions affect the portrayal of climate change impacts?

End users face a range of subjective decisions when evaluating climate change impacts on hydrology, but the importance of these decisions is rarely assessed. In this paper, we evaluate the implications of hydrologic modelling choices on projected changes in the annual water balance, monthly simulated processes, and signature measures (i.e. metrics that quantify characteristics of the hydrologic catchment response) under a future climate scenario. To this end, we compare hydrologic changes computed with four different model structures – whose parameters have been obtained using a common calibration strategy – with hydrologic changes computed with a single model structure and parameter sets from multiple options for different calibration decisions (objective function, local optima, and calibration forcing dataset). Results show that both model structure selection and the parameter estimation strategy affect the direction and magnitude of projected changes in the annual water balance, and that the relative effects of these decisions are basin dependent. The analysis of monthly changes illustrates that parameter estimation strategies can provide similar or larger uncertainties in simulations of some hydrologic processes when compared with uncertainties coming from model choice. We found that the relative effects of modelling decisions on projected changes in catchment behaviour depend on the signature measure analysed. Furthermore, parameter sets with similar performance, but located in different regions of the parameter space, provide very different projections for future catchment behaviour. More generally, the results obtained in this study prompt the need to incorporate parametric uncertainty in multi-model frameworks to avoid an over-confident portrayal of climate change impacts. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization , 1993 .

[2]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A process‐based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model , 2008 .

[3]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  DECLINING MOUNTAIN SNOWPACK IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2005 .

[4]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[5]  Nicholas E. Wayand,et al.  Intercomparison of Meteorological Forcing Data from Empirical and Mesoscale Model Sources in the North Fork American River Basin in Northern Sierra Nevada, California* , 2013 .

[6]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[7]  R. Dudley,et al.  Changes in Spring Snowpack for Selected Basins in the United States for Different Climate-Change Scenarios , 2011 .

[8]  W. P. Miller,et al.  Water Management Decisions Using Multiple Hydrologic Models within the San Juan River Basin under Changing Climate Conditions , 2012 .

[9]  Jin Teng,et al.  Climate non-stationarity – Validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studies , 2010 .

[10]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[11]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Noah land surface model modifications to improve snowpack prediction in the Colorado Rocky Mountains , 2010 .

[12]  M. Ek,et al.  Continental‐scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS‐2): 2. Validation of model‐simulated streamflow , 2012 .

[13]  C. Deser,et al.  Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[14]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Simulation of seasonal snowfall over Colorado , 2010 .

[15]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes , 2006 .

[16]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States* , 2002 .

[17]  M. Rummukainen,et al.  Climate change impacts on runoff in Sweden assessments by global climate models, dynamical downscaling and hydrological modelling , 2001 .

[18]  Ralf Merz,et al.  Catchment classification by runoff behaviour with self-organizing maps (SOM) , 2011, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[19]  C. Deser,et al.  Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate , 2012 .

[20]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins , 2011 .

[21]  M. Clark,et al.  An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States , 2014 .

[22]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  A simple TOPMODEL-based runoff parameterization (SIMTOP) for use in global climate models , 2005 .

[23]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[24]  J. Dudhia,et al.  High resolution coupled climate-runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: A process study of current and warmer climate , 2011 .

[25]  C. Deser,et al.  Projecting North American Climate over the Next 50 Years: Uncertainty due to Internal Variability* , 2014 .

[26]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Influence of spatial resolution on simulated streamflow in a macroscale hydrologic model , 2002 .

[27]  S. Bastola,et al.  The role of hydrological modelling uncertainties in climate change impact assessments of Irish river catchments , 2011 .

[28]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling , 2011 .

[30]  R. Leconte,et al.  Overall uncertainty study of the hydrological impacts of climate change for a Canadian watershed , 2011 .

[31]  W. P. Miller,et al.  Trends in Western U.S. Snowpack and Related Upper Colorado River Basin Streamflow 1 , 2011 .

[32]  T. Huntington.  Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis , 2006 .

[33]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Hydrologic Implications of Different Large-Scale Meteorological Model Forcing Datasets in Mountainous Regions , 2014 .

[34]  D. B. Boorman,et al.  RECOGNISING THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE QUANTIFICATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE , 1997 .

[35]  R. Wilby,et al.  A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low‐flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK , 2006 .

[36]  Casey Brown,et al.  The integrated effects of climate and hydrologic uncertainty on future flood risk assessments , 2015 .

[37]  H. Fowler,et al.  Modeling the impacts of future climate change on water resources for the Gállego river basin (Spain) , 2012 .

[38]  R. Vogel,et al.  Annual hydroclimatology of the United States , 2000 .

[39]  P. Mote,et al.  Twentieth-Century Trends in Runoff, Evapotranspiration, and Soil Moisture in the Western United States* , 2007 .

[40]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Catchment classification: hydrological analysis of catchment behavior through process-based modeling along a climate gradient , 2011 .

[41]  J. Janowiak,et al.  CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2004 .

[42]  M. Clark,et al.  Seasonal Cycle Shifts in Hydroclimatology over the Western United States , 2003 .

[43]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .

[44]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  A land-surface hydrology parameterization with subgrid variability for general circulation models , 1992 .

[45]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements , 2011 .

[46]  M. Clark,et al.  Effects of Hydrologic Model Choice and Calibration on the Portrayal of Climate Change Impacts , 2015 .

[47]  Ian G. Main,et al.  Permeability evolution during progressive development of deformation bands in porous sandstones , 2003 .

[48]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[49]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  RAMI4PILPS: An intercomparison of formulations for the partitioning of solar radiation in land surface models , 2011 .

[50]  B. Santer,et al.  Attribution of declining Western U.S. Snowpack to human effects , 2008 .

[51]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Multiobjective sensitivity analysis to understand the information content in streamflow observations for distributed watershed modeling , 2009 .

[52]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  How Does the Choice of Distributed Meteorological Data Affect Hydrologic Model Calibration and Streamflow Simulations , 2014 .

[53]  Arthur A. Mirin,et al.  Detection and Attribution of Streamflow Timing Changes to Climate Change in the Western United States , 2009 .

[54]  Alison L. Kay,et al.  Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar? , 2010 .

[55]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Distributed Evaluation of Local Sensitivity Analysis (DELSA), with application to hydrologic models , 2014 .

[56]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Effects of Frozen Soil on Snowmelt Runoff and Soil Water Storage at a Continental Scale , 2006 .

[57]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[58]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[59]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin , 2006 .

[60]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation under climate change (with uncertainty) , 2000 .

[61]  Francis H. S. Chiew,et al.  Estimating the sensitivity of mean annual runoff to climate change using selected hydrological models , 2006 .

[62]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[63]  A. V. Vecchia,et al.  Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate , 2005, Nature.

[64]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modification , 1996 .

[65]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  The Sensitivity of Simulated River Discharge to Land Surface Representation and Meteorological Forcings , 2010, Journal of Hydrometeorology.

[66]  磯貝 明,et al.  研究所紹介 米国農務省林産研究所,Atalla博士のグル-プ--Forest Products Laboratory(FPL),Forest Service(FS),United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) , 1997 .

[67]  D. Tullos,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrologic modelling for estimating hydrologic response due to climate change (Santiam River, Oregon) , 2013 .

[68]  Yuqing Wang,et al.  Downscaling of Climate Change in the Hawaii Region Using CMIP5 Results: On the Choice of the Forcing Fields* , 2013 .

[69]  Dag Lohmann,et al.  A large‐scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes , 1996 .

[70]  Cédric H. David,et al.  Hydrological evaluation of the Noah‐MP land surface model for the Mississippi River Basin , 2014 .

[71]  Julie A. Vano,et al.  Hydrologic Sensitivities of Colorado River Runoff to Changes in Precipitation and Temperature , 2012 .

[72]  S. Steele‐Dunne,et al.  The impacts of climate change on hydrology in Ireland , 2008 .

[73]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[74]  Keith Beven,et al.  Climate change and fluvial flood risk in the UK: more of the same? , 2008 .

[75]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Robust adaptation to climate change , 2010 .

[76]  Rolf Weingartner,et al.  Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments , 2014 .

[77]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies , 2015 .

[78]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  Changes toward Earlier Streamflow Timing across Western North America , 2005 .

[79]  A. B. Smith,et al.  The Murrumbidgee soil moisture monitoring network data set , 2012 .

[80]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA , 2011 .

[81]  P. Reed,et al.  Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models , 2009 .

[82]  Sarah M. Kang,et al.  Uncertainty in Climate Change Projections of the Hadley Circulation: The Role of Internal Variability , 2013 .

[83]  P. Milly,et al.  On the Hydrologic Adjustment of Climate-Model Projections: The Potential Pitfall of Potential Evapotranspiration , 2011 .

[84]  Kiyomi Morino,et al.  Understanding Uncertainties in Future Colorado River Streamflow , 2014 .

[85]  X. Chen,et al.  Comparison of hydrological impacts of climate change simulated by six hydrological models in the Dongjiang Basin, South China , 2007 .

[86]  Pablo A. Mendoza,et al.  Implications of the Methodological Choices for Hydrologic Portrayals of Climate Change over the Contiguous United States: Statistically Downscaled Forcing Data and Hydrologic Models , 2016 .

[87]  Casey Brown,et al.  Toward a statistical framework to quantify the uncertainties of hydrologic response under climate change , 2012 .

[88]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[89]  Robert Leconte,et al.  Uncertainty of hydrological modelling in climate change impact studies in a Canadian, snow-dominated river basin , 2011 .

[90]  Desiree Tullos,et al.  Selection of hydrologic modeling approaches for climate change assessment: A comparison of model scale and structures , 2012 .

[91]  Ludovic Oudin,et al.  Hydrological model parameter instability: A source of additional uncertainty in estimating the hydrological impacts of climate change? , 2013 .

[92]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) , 2006 .

[93]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Real‐time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project , 2003 .

[94]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States , 2003 .

[95]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[96]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classi(cid:142) cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi(cid:142) cation tree approach , 2004 .

[97]  G. Thompson,et al.  Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization , 2008 .

[98]  Alison L. Kay,et al.  Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England , 2009 .

[99]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept , 2015 .

[100]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[101]  G. E. Mountassir,et al.  Hydrodynamic coupling in microbially mediated fracture mineralization: Formation of self‐organized groundwater flow channels , 2014 .

[102]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses , 2011 .

[103]  Alan Harrison,et al.  Assessing reservoir operations risk under climate change , 2009 .

[104]  Christel Prudhomme,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: future climate , 2009 .

[105]  H. Moradkhani,et al.  Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studies , 2011 .

[106]  D. Lüthi,et al.  Surrogate climate-change scenarios for regional climate models , 1996 .

[107]  M. Jensen,et al.  Scheduling Irrigations Using Climate-Crop-Soil Data , 1970 .

[108]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  When are multiobjective calibration trade‐offs in hydrologic models meaningful? , 2012 .

[109]  M. Hara,et al.  Estimation of the Impact of Global Warming on Snow Depth in Japan by the Pseudo-Global-Warming Method , 2008 .

[110]  Aixue Hu,et al.  Uncertainty in future regional sea level rise due to internal climate variability , 2013 .

[111]  W. P. Miller,et al.  Regional Analysis of Trend and Step Changes Observed in Hydroclimatic Variables around the Colorado River Basin , 2008 .

[112]  W. Mauser,et al.  The role of hydrological model complexity and uncertainty in climate change impact assessment , 2009 .

[113]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment , 2005 .

[114]  C. Ancey,et al.  An exact solution for ideal dam‐break floods on steep slopes , 2008 .

[115]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A Comparison of Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling of Winter Precipitation over Complex Terrain , 2011 .

[116]  François Anctil,et al.  Multimodel evaluation of twenty lumped hydrological models under contrasted climate conditions , 2011 .

[117]  Hiroaki Ueda,et al.  Intermodel variability of future changes in the Baiu rainband estimated by the pseudo global warming downscaling method , 2009 .

[118]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[119]  L. Hay,et al.  A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado , 1999 .

[120]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Climate Change Impacts on the Water Balance of the Colorado Headwaters: High-Resolution Regional Climate Model Simulations , 2014 .

[121]  Yury Motovilov,et al.  Large-basin hydrological response to climate model outputs: uncertainty caused by internal atmospheric variability , 2015 .

[122]  Y. Gusev,et al.  Impact of uncertainties in meteorological forcing data and land surface parameters on global estimates of terrestrial water balance components , 2011 .

[123]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Multiple-criteria calibration of a distributed watershed model using spatial regularization and response signatures , 2012 .

[124]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Hydrologic uncertainties in climate change from IPCC AR4 GCM simulations of the Chungju Basin, Korea , 2011 .

[125]  Relating climate change signals and physiographic catchment properties to clustered hydrological response types , 2012 .

[126]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Mapping model behaviour using Self-Organizing Maps , 2008 .

[127]  Bengt Carlsson,et al.  Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods – a case study on the Lule River basin , 2007 .

[128]  Julien Lerat,et al.  Crash testing hydrological models in contrasted climate conditions: An experiment on 216 Australian catchments , 2012 .

[129]  P. Reed,et al.  Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient , 2008 .

[130]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Importance of Regional Climate Model Grid Spacing for the Simulation of Heavy Precipitation in the Colorado Headwaters , 2013 .

[131]  J. MacQueen.  Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[132]  M. Clark,et al.  Use of Regional Climate Model Output for Hydrologic Simulations , 2001 .

[133]  C. Deser,et al.  Atmospheric impacts of Arctic sea-ice loss, 1979–2009: separating forced change from atmospheric internal variability , 2013, Climate Dynamics.