A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities

[1]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Sakti Pramanik,et al.  Reliable Semantics for Extended Logic Programs with Rule Prioritization , 1995, J. Log. Comput..

[3]  Henry Prakken,et al.  On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability and dynamic priorities , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[4]  Henry Prakken.  A semantic view on reasoning about priorities (extended abstract) , 1995 .

[5]  Gerhard Brewka.  Reasoning about Priorities in Default Logic , 1994, AAAI.

[6]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming: Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning , 1994 .

[7]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  An Argumentation Semantics for Logic Programming with Explicit Negation , 1993, ICLP.

[8]  Andrew S. Merrill,et al.  A design for reasoning with policies, precedents, and rationales , 1993, ICAIL '93.

[9]  Francesca Toni,et al.  An Assumption-Based Framework for Non-Monotonic Reasoning , 1993, LPNMR.

[10]  José Júlio Alferes,et al.  Well Founded Semantics for Logic Programs with Explicit Negation , 1992, ECAI.

[11]  Hector Geffner,et al.  Conditional Entailment: Bridging two Approaches to Default Reasoning , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Dirk Vermeir,et al.  A Fixpoint Semantics for Ordered Logic , 1990, J. Log. Comput..

[14]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Defeasible Reasoning , 2020, Synthese Library.