Influence of collisions on ion dynamics in the inner comae of four comets.

Context Collisions between cometary neutrals in the inner coma of a comet and cometary ions that have been picked up into the solar wind flow and return to the coma lead to the formation of a broad inner boundary known as a collisionopause. This boundary is produced by a combination of charge transfer and chemical reactions, both of which are important at the location of the collisionopause boundary. Four spacecraft measured ion densities and velocities in the inner region of comets, exploring the part of the coma where an ion-neutral collisionopause boundary is expected to form. Aims The aims are to determine the dominant physics behind the formation of the ion-neutral collisionopause and to evaluate where this boundary has been observed by spacecraft. Methods We evaluated observations from three spacecraft at four different comets to determine if a collisionopause boundary was observed based on the reported ion velocities. We compared the measured location of the ion-neutral collisionopause with measurements of the collision cross sections to evaluate whether chemistry or charge exchange are more important at the location where the collisionopause is observed. Results Based on measurements of the cross sections for charge transfer and for chemical reactions, the boundary observed by Rosetta appears to be the location where chemistry becomes the more probable result of a collision between H2O and H2O+ than charge exchange. Comparisons with ion observations made by Deep Space 1 at 19P/Borrelly and Giotto at 1P/Halley and 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup show that similar boundaries were observed at 19P/Borrelly and 1P/Halley. The ion composition measurements made by Giotto at Halley confirm that chemistry becomes more important inside of this boundary and that electron-ion dissociative recombination is a driver for the reported ion pileup boundary.

[1]  Arnaud Beth,et al.  Comparative study of photo-produced ionosphere in the close environment of comets , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[2]  C. Goetz,et al.  The infant bow shock: a new frontier at a weak activity comet , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[3]  R. Hajra,et al.  Plasma source and loss at comet 67P during the Rosetta mission , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[4]  M. André,et al.  Ion Velocity and Electron Temperature Inside and Around the Diamagnetic Cavity of Comet 67P , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[5]  R. Hajra,et al.  Plasma Density Structures at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2018, 1803.08829.

[6]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  The birth and growth of a solar wind cavity around a comet – Rosetta observations , 2017, 1805.06159.

[7]  C. Goetz,et al.  Effective ion speeds at ~200–250 km from comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko near perihelion , 2017 .

[8]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  Two years of solar wind and pickup ion measurements at comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko , 2017 .

[9]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  Evolution of the magnetic field at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2017 .

[10]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  Diamagnetic region(s): structure of the unmagnetized plasma around Comet 67P/CG , 2017 .

[11]  M. Wieser,et al.  Evolution of the ion environment of comet 67P during the Rosetta mission as seen by RPC-ICA , 2017 .

[12]  I. Richter,et al.  Modelling the size of the very dynamic diamagnetic cavity of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko , 2017 .

[13]  M. Wieser,et al.  Measurements of the electrostatic potential of Rosetta at comet 67P , 2017, 1708.08803.

[14]  E. Cupido,et al.  Vertical structure of the near-surface expanding ionosphere of comet 67P probed by Rosetta , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[15]  B. J. Buratti,et al.  The Rosetta mission orbiter science overview: the comet phase , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  J. Lebreton,et al.  RPC observation of the development and evolution of plasma interaction boundaries at 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2016 .

[17]  I. Richter,et al.  Charged particle signatures of the diamagnetic cavity of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko , 2016 .

[18]  J. Lebreton,et al.  Ionospheric plasma of comet 67P probed byRosettaat 3 au from the Sun , 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[19]  N. Edberg,et al.  MODEL-OBSERVATION COMPARISONS OF ELECTRON NUMBER DENSITIES IN THE COMA OF 67P/CHURYUMOV–GERASIMENKO DURING 2015 JANUARY , 2016 .

[20]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  First detection of a diamagnetic cavity at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2016 .

[21]  S. Schwartz,et al.  ON THE ELECTRON-TO-NEUTRAL NUMBER DENSITY RATIO IN THE COMA OF COMET 67P/CHURYUMOV–GERASIMENKO: GUIDING EXPRESSION AND SOURCES FOR DEVIATIONS , 2015 .

[22]  M. Verigin,et al.  Permanent and Nonstationary Plasma Phenomena in Comet Halley's Head , 2013 .

[23]  F. Bagenal,et al.  The roles of charge exchange and dissociation in spreading Saturn's neutral clouds , 2012, 1204.0979.

[24]  A. Coates Bow Shocks at Comets , 2009 .

[25]  W. Ip,et al.  Exospheres and Atmospheric Escape , 2008 .

[26]  J.-E. Wahlund,et al.  RPC-LAP: The Rosetta Langmuir Probe Instrument , 2007 .

[27]  R. Lundin,et al.  RPC-IES: The Ion and Electron Sensor of the Rosetta Plasma Consortium , 2007 .

[28]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  RPC: The Rosetta Plasma Consortium , 2007 .

[29]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  RPC-MAG The Fluxgate Magnetometer in the ROSETTA Plasma Consortium , 2007 .

[30]  N. Mason,et al.  Cross Sections for Electron Collisions with Water Molecules , 2005 .

[31]  J. Pettersson,et al.  Dissociative recombination of NH4+ and ND4+ ions: storage ring experiments and ab initio molecular dynamics. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[32]  T. Cravens,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamic processes in the inner coma of comet Halley , 1997 .

[33]  M. Pätzold,et al.  Detection of the inner plasma pileup region at comet Halley during the Vega 1 flyby by the radio sounding experiment , 1997 .

[34]  F. Neubauer,et al.  Cometary ion pressure anisotropies at comets Halley and Grigg‐Skjellerup , 1996 .

[35]  H. Balsiger,et al.  Heating of the thermal electrons in the coma of comet P/Halley , 1996 .

[36]  H. Rosenbauer,et al.  Giotto ion mass spectrometer measurements at comet P/Grigg-Skjellerup , 1994 .

[37]  E. Murad,et al.  Cross Sections and Product Kinetic Energy Analysis of H2O+ -H2O collisions at Suprathermal Energies , 1990 .

[38]  T. Cravens,et al.  Electron energetics in the inner coma of comet Halley , 1990 .

[39]  W. Ip,et al.  Cometary H2+ and solar wind He2+ dynamics across the Halley cometopause , 1988 .

[40]  Tamas I. Gombosi,et al.  CHARGE EXCHANGE AVALANCHE AT THE COMETOPAUSE , 1987 .

[41]  R. Sagdeev,et al.  Position and Structure of the comet Halley Bow Shock: Vega-1 and Vega-2 Measurements (GRL 13(8) 1986) , 1986 .

[42]  A. Nagy,et al.  Detection of a new “chemical” boundary at comet Halley , 1986 .

[43]  W. Ip,et al.  Ion composition and dynamics at comet Halley , 1986 .

[44]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  First results from the Giotto magnetometer experiment at comet Halley , 1986 .

[45]  J. Slavin,et al.  Comet-solar wind interaction - Dynamical length scales and models , 1986 .

[46]  R. Wiens,et al.  Solar wind interactions with Comet 19P/Borrelly , 2004 .

[47]  A. Coates Ionospheres and magnetospheres of comets , 1997 .

[48]  T. Cravens Collisional processes in cometary plasmas , 1991 .

[49]  T. Cravens Cometary plasma boundaries , 1989 .